Nature Reviews Immunology最新文献

The extent of central T cell tolerance is determined by the diversity of self-antigens that developing thymocytes ‘see’ on thymic antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Here, focusing on insights from the past decade, we review the functional adaptations of medullary thymic epithelial cells, thymic dendritic cells and thymic B cells for the purpose of tolerance induction. Their distinct cellular characteristics range from unconventional phenomena, such as promiscuous gene expression or mimicry of peripheral cell types, to strategic positioning in distinct microenvironments and divergent propensities to preferentially access endogenous or exogenous antigen pools. We also discuss how ‘tonic’ inflammatory signals in the thymic microenvironment may extend the intrathymically visible ‘self’ to include autoantigens that are otherwise associated with highly immunogenic peripheral environments.

Macrophages destroy bacteria and other microorganisms through phagocytosis-coupled antimicrobial responses, such as the generation of reactive oxygen species and the delivery of hydrolytic enzymes from lysosomes to the phagosome. However, many intracellular bacteria subvert these responses, escaping to other cellular compartments to survive and/or replicate. Such bacterial subversion strategies are countered by a range of additional direct antibacterial responses that are switched on by pattern-recognition receptors and/or host-derived cytokines and other factors, often through inducible gene expression and/or metabolic reprogramming. Our understanding of these inducible antibacterial defence strategies in macrophages is rapidly evolving. In this Review, we provide an overview of the broad repertoire of antibacterial responses that can be engaged in macrophages, including LC3-associated phagocytosis, metabolic reprogramming and antimicrobial metabolites, lipid droplets, guanylate-binding proteins, antimicrobial peptides, metal ion toxicity, nutrient depletion, autophagy and nitric oxide production. We also highlight key inducers, signalling pathways and transcription factors involved in driving these different antibacterial responses. Finally, we discuss how a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms of antibacterial responses in macrophages might be exploited for developing host-directed therapies to combat antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are crucial gatekeepers of the balance between immunity and tolerance. They exist in two functional states, immature or mature, that refer to an information-sensing versus an information-transmitting state, respectively. Historically, the term DC maturation was used to describe the acquisition of immunostimulatory capacity by DCs following their triggering by pathogens or tissue damage signals. As such, immature DCs were proposed to mediate tolerance, whereas mature DCs were associated with the induction of protective T cell immunity. Later studies have challenged this view and unequivocally demonstrated that two distinct modes of DC maturation exist, homeostatic and immunogenic DC maturation, each with a distinct functional outcome. Therefore, the mere expression of maturation markers cannot be used to predict immunogenicity. How DCs become activated in homeostatic conditions and maintain tolerance remains an area of intense debate. Several recent studies have shed light on the signals driving the homeostatic maturation programme, especially in the conventional type 1 DC (cDC1) compartment. Here, we highlight our growing understanding of homeostatic DC maturation and the relevance of this process for immune tolerance.

Antibodies are exceptionally versatile molecules with remarkable flexibility in their binding properties. Their natural targets range from small-molecule toxins, across viruses of different sizes, to bacteria and large multicellular parasites. The molecular determinants bound by antibodies include proteins, peptides, carbohydrates, nucleic acids, lipids and even synthetic molecules that have never existed in nature. Membrane-anchored antibodies also serve as receptors on the surface of the B cells that produce them. Despite recent structural insights, there is still no unifying molecular mechanism to explain how antibody targets (antigens) trigger the activation of these B-cell receptors (BCRs). After cognate antigen encounter, somatic hypermutation and class-switch recombination allow BCR affinity maturation and immunoglobulin class-specific responses, respectively. This raises the fundamental question of how one receptor activation mechanism can accommodate a plethora of variant receptors and ligands, and how it can ensure that individual B cells remain responsive to antigen after somatic hypermutation and class switching. There is still no definite answer. Here we give a brief historical account of the different models proposed to explain BCR triggering and discuss their merit in the context of the current knowledge of the structure of BCRs, their dynamic membrane distribution, and recent biochemical and cell biological insights.

Inflammation drives pathology in many human diseases for which there are no disease-modifying drugs. Inflammasomes are signalling platforms that can induce pathological inflammation and tissue damage, having potential as an exciting new class of drug targets. Small-molecule inhibitors of the NLRP3 inflammasome that are now in clinical trials have demonstrated proof of concept that inflammasomes are druggable, and so drug development programmes are now focusing on other key inflammasome molecules. In this Review, we describe the potential of inflammasome components as candidate drug targets and the novel inflammasome inhibitors that are being developed. We discuss how the signalling biology of inflammasomes offers mechanistic insights for therapeutic targeting. We also discuss the major scientific and technical challenges associated with drugging these molecules during preclinical development and clinical trials.

Oral tolerance is the process by which feeding of soluble proteins induces antigen-specific systemic immune unresponsiveness. Oral tolerance is thought to have a central role in suppressing immune responses to ‘harmless’ food antigens, and its failure can lead to development of pathologies such as food allergies or coeliac disease. However, on the basis of long-standing experimental observations, the relevance of oral tolerance in human health has achieved new prominence recently following the discovery that oral administration of peanut proteins prevents the development of peanut allergy in at-risk human infants. In this Review, we summarize the new mechanistic insights into three key processes necessary for the induction of tolerance to oral antigens: antigen uptake and transport across the small intestinal epithelial barrier to the underlying immune cells; the processing, transport and presentation of fed antigen by different populations of antigen-presenting cells; and the development of immunosuppressive T cell populations that mediate antigen-specific tolerance. In addition, we consider how related but distinct processes maintain tolerance to bacterial antigens in the large intestine. Finally, we outline the molecular mechanisms and functional consequences of failure of oral tolerance and how these may be modulated to enhance clinical outcomes and prevent disease.