渔业兼捕渔获物缓解措施对脆弱海洋动物和目标渔获物的影响

IF 25.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Nature Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1038/s41893-024-01422-7
Cheng Huang, Jake Rice, Andries Richter, Kaiwen Zhou, Yi Wang, Chentao Wei, Emilio Pagani-Núñez, Philipp N. Maleko, Xiong Zhang, Tien Ming Lee, Yang Liu
{"title":"渔业兼捕渔获物缓解措施对脆弱海洋动物和目标渔获物的影响","authors":"Cheng Huang, Jake Rice, Andries Richter, Kaiwen Zhou, Yi Wang, Chentao Wei, Emilio Pagani-Núñez, Philipp N. Maleko, Xiong Zhang, Tien Ming Lee, Yang Liu","doi":"10.1038/s41893-024-01422-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reducing fisheries bycatches of vulnerable species is critical to marine biodiversity conservation and sustainable fisheries development. Although various preventive technical measures have been implemented, their overall effects are poorly understood. Here, we used a meta-analysis approach to quantify the effects of 42 technical measures on the target catch and the bycatch of seabirds, elasmobranchs, marine mammals and sea turtles. We showed that these measures generally reduced the bycatch while having no statistically significant effect on the target catch. Sensory-based measures generally outperformed physical-based ones in reducing the bycatch. Mitigation measures that worked well for several fishing gears or taxa, although useful, were very rare. Most of the adoptions by regional fisheries management organizations (59%) were supported by our findings, although many others are yet to be robustly evaluated. Our study encourages the innovation and adoption of technical measures and provides crucial insights for policy-making and further research in sustainable bycatch management. Various preventive measures are used to avoid non-target species or bycatch in fishing operations, but the success of such measures is not well understood. This study evaluates the effects of technical mitigation measures on both vulnerable marine fauna bycatch and target catch.","PeriodicalId":19056,"journal":{"name":"Nature Sustainability","volume":"7 11","pages":"1535-1545"},"PeriodicalIF":25.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of fishery bycatch-mitigation measures on vulnerable marine fauna and target catch\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Huang, Jake Rice, Andries Richter, Kaiwen Zhou, Yi Wang, Chentao Wei, Emilio Pagani-Núñez, Philipp N. Maleko, Xiong Zhang, Tien Ming Lee, Yang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41893-024-01422-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reducing fisheries bycatches of vulnerable species is critical to marine biodiversity conservation and sustainable fisheries development. Although various preventive technical measures have been implemented, their overall effects are poorly understood. Here, we used a meta-analysis approach to quantify the effects of 42 technical measures on the target catch and the bycatch of seabirds, elasmobranchs, marine mammals and sea turtles. We showed that these measures generally reduced the bycatch while having no statistically significant effect on the target catch. Sensory-based measures generally outperformed physical-based ones in reducing the bycatch. Mitigation measures that worked well for several fishing gears or taxa, although useful, were very rare. Most of the adoptions by regional fisheries management organizations (59%) were supported by our findings, although many others are yet to be robustly evaluated. Our study encourages the innovation and adoption of technical measures and provides crucial insights for policy-making and further research in sustainable bycatch management. Various preventive measures are used to avoid non-target species or bycatch in fishing operations, but the success of such measures is not well understood. This study evaluates the effects of technical mitigation measures on both vulnerable marine fauna bycatch and target catch.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"7 11\",\"pages\":\"1535-1545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01422-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01422-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

减少渔业兼捕脆弱物种对海洋生物多样性保护和渔业可持续发展至关重要。尽管已经实施了各种预防性技术措施,但人们对其总体效果知之甚少。在此,我们采用荟萃分析方法,量化了 42 项技术措施对目标渔获量和海鸟、伶鲽类、海洋哺乳动物和海龟误捕的影响。我们发现,这些措施普遍减少了副渔获物,但对目标渔获量没有显著的统计影响。在减少混获方面,感官措施通常优于物理措施。对多个渔具或分类群有效的减缓措施尽管有用,但非常罕见。区域渔业管理组织采用的大多数措施(59%)都得到了我们研究结果的支持,但许多其他措施还有待有力评估。我们的研究鼓励技术措施的创新和采用,并为可持续混获管理的政策制定和进一步研究提供了重要见解。为避免捕捞作业中的非目标鱼种或混获,人们采取了各种预防措施,但对这些措施的成功与否还不甚了解。本研究评估了技术缓解措施对脆弱海洋动物副渔获物和目标渔获物的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of fishery bycatch-mitigation measures on vulnerable marine fauna and target catch
Reducing fisheries bycatches of vulnerable species is critical to marine biodiversity conservation and sustainable fisheries development. Although various preventive technical measures have been implemented, their overall effects are poorly understood. Here, we used a meta-analysis approach to quantify the effects of 42 technical measures on the target catch and the bycatch of seabirds, elasmobranchs, marine mammals and sea turtles. We showed that these measures generally reduced the bycatch while having no statistically significant effect on the target catch. Sensory-based measures generally outperformed physical-based ones in reducing the bycatch. Mitigation measures that worked well for several fishing gears or taxa, although useful, were very rare. Most of the adoptions by regional fisheries management organizations (59%) were supported by our findings, although many others are yet to be robustly evaluated. Our study encourages the innovation and adoption of technical measures and provides crucial insights for policy-making and further research in sustainable bycatch management. Various preventive measures are used to avoid non-target species or bycatch in fishing operations, but the success of such measures is not well understood. This study evaluates the effects of technical mitigation measures on both vulnerable marine fauna bycatch and target catch.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Sustainability
Nature Sustainability Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Nature Sustainability aims to facilitate cross-disciplinary dialogues and bring together research fields that contribute to understanding how we organize our lives in a finite world and the impacts of our actions. Nature Sustainability will not only publish fundamental research but also significant investigations into policies and solutions for ensuring human well-being now and in the future.Its ultimate goal is to address the greatest challenges of our time.
期刊最新文献
Data-driven strategies to improve nitrogen use efficiency of rice farming in South Asia Global South researchers need to focus on losses and damages Turning straw into reduced graphene oxide One-step conversion of biomass to reduced graphene oxide at room temperature Rethinking responses to the world’s water crises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1