Hafiz A Adawi, Saurabh Jain, Ahmed O Shami, Hamood M Mahdali, Ali M Kaabi, Osama B Balki, Marco Cicciù, Giuseppe Minervini
{"title":"评估老化对旧复合树脂修复体与修复复合树脂之间剪切粘接强度的影响:体外研究。","authors":"Hafiz A Adawi, Saurabh Jain, Ahmed O Shami, Hamood M Mahdali, Ali M Kaabi, Osama B Balki, Marco Cicciù, Giuseppe Minervini","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6329.24.04889-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of aging on the repair bond strength between old composite resin and repaired composite resin and to evaluate which type of repair composite material provides better bond strength in different time durations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty nano-hybrid composite specimens were randomly divided into four groups (N.=20) and exposed to accelerated aging from 0 to 2 years. Each group was further divided into two subgroups, A and B, repaired with packable and flowable composite respectively, after micro-abrasion treatment. Shear bond strength was assessed and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was observed that with an increase in aging time, the bond strength of both the composite materials used for repair decreased. The flowable composite's mean bond strength (22.09±0.65, 18.74±2.36, and 17.74±2.38 MPa) was more than the packable composite (21.97±0.84, 17.97±3.85, and 15.97±2.45 MPa) used for repair on aged specimens. In contrast, the bond strength of the packable was more than the flowable composite in control group specimens that were not aged (23.25±0.89 vs. 22.40±1.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As restored composites age, their bond strength decreases. Flowable composite displays better repair shear strength than packable composite as aging progresses. Micro abrasion followed by flowable composite bonding can repair aged composite restorations effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":18709,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dental and oral science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the effect of aging on the shear bond strength between old composite resin restoration and the repair composite resin: an in-vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Hafiz A Adawi, Saurabh Jain, Ahmed O Shami, Hamood M Mahdali, Ali M Kaabi, Osama B Balki, Marco Cicciù, Giuseppe Minervini\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-6329.24.04889-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of aging on the repair bond strength between old composite resin and repaired composite resin and to evaluate which type of repair composite material provides better bond strength in different time durations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty nano-hybrid composite specimens were randomly divided into four groups (N.=20) and exposed to accelerated aging from 0 to 2 years. Each group was further divided into two subgroups, A and B, repaired with packable and flowable composite respectively, after micro-abrasion treatment. Shear bond strength was assessed and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was observed that with an increase in aging time, the bond strength of both the composite materials used for repair decreased. The flowable composite's mean bond strength (22.09±0.65, 18.74±2.36, and 17.74±2.38 MPa) was more than the packable composite (21.97±0.84, 17.97±3.85, and 15.97±2.45 MPa) used for repair on aged specimens. In contrast, the bond strength of the packable was more than the flowable composite in control group specimens that were not aged (23.25±0.89 vs. 22.40±1.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As restored composites age, their bond strength decreases. Flowable composite displays better repair shear strength than packable composite as aging progresses. Micro abrasion followed by flowable composite bonding can repair aged composite restorations effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva dental and oral science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva dental and oral science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.24.04889-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dental and oral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.24.04889-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究旨在评估老化对旧复合树脂和修复复合树脂之间修复粘接强度的影响,并评估哪种类型的修复复合材料在不同的时间跨度内能提供更好的粘接强度:方法:将 80 个纳米杂化复合材料试样随机分为四组(N=20),暴露于 0 至 2 年的加速老化过程中。每组又分为 A 和 B 两组,在微磨蚀处理后分别用可包装和可流动的复合材料进行修复。对剪切粘接强度进行了评估和统计分析:结果发现,随着老化时间的延长,两种修复用复合材料的粘接强度都有所下降。可流动复合材料的平均粘接强度(22.09±0.65、18.74±2.36 和 17.74±2.38 MPa)高于用于修复老化试样的可包装复合材料(21.97±0.84、17.97±3.85 和 15.97±2.45 MPa)。相比之下,在未老化的对照组试样中,可包装复合材料的粘接强度高于可流动复合材料(23.25±0.89 vs. 22.40±1.26):结论:随着修复复合材料的老化,其粘接强度会降低。随着时间的推移,可流动复合材料的修复剪切强度优于可包装复合材料。微磨后再用可流动复合材料粘接,可以有效修复老化的复合材料修复体。
Evaluation of the effect of aging on the shear bond strength between old composite resin restoration and the repair composite resin: an in-vitro study.
Background: The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of aging on the repair bond strength between old composite resin and repaired composite resin and to evaluate which type of repair composite material provides better bond strength in different time durations.
Methods: Eighty nano-hybrid composite specimens were randomly divided into four groups (N.=20) and exposed to accelerated aging from 0 to 2 years. Each group was further divided into two subgroups, A and B, repaired with packable and flowable composite respectively, after micro-abrasion treatment. Shear bond strength was assessed and statistically analyzed.
Results: It was observed that with an increase in aging time, the bond strength of both the composite materials used for repair decreased. The flowable composite's mean bond strength (22.09±0.65, 18.74±2.36, and 17.74±2.38 MPa) was more than the packable composite (21.97±0.84, 17.97±3.85, and 15.97±2.45 MPa) used for repair on aged specimens. In contrast, the bond strength of the packable was more than the flowable composite in control group specimens that were not aged (23.25±0.89 vs. 22.40±1.26).
Conclusions: As restored composites age, their bond strength decreases. Flowable composite displays better repair shear strength than packable composite as aging progresses. Micro abrasion followed by flowable composite bonding can repair aged composite restorations effectively.