{"title":"为肿瘤工程三维模型量身定制新陈代谢活性检测方法。","authors":"Julien Clegg , Rodrigo Curvello , Anastasiia Gabrielyan , Daniel Croagh , Sandra Hauser , Daniela Loessner","doi":"10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Monitoring cell behaviour in hydrogel-based 3D models is critical for assessing their growth and response to cytotoxic treatment. Resazurin-based PrestoBlue and AlamarBlue reagents are frequently used metabolic activity assays when determining cell responses. However, both assays are largely applied to cell monolayer cultures but yet to have a defined protocol for use in hydrogel-based 3D models. The assays' performance depends on the cell type, culture condition and measurement sensitivity. To better understand how both assays perform, we grew pancreatic cancer cells in gelatin methacryloyl and collagen hydrogels and evaluated their metabolic activity using different concentrations and incubation times of the PrestoBlue and AlamarBlue reagents. We tested reagent concentrations of 4 % and 10 % and incubation times of 45 min, 2 h and 4 h. In addition, we co-cultured cancer cells together with cancer-associated fibroblasts and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels and subjected them to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel to evaluate how both assays perform when characterising cell responses upon drug treatment. CyQuant assays were conducted on the same samples and compared to data from the metabolic activity assays. In cancer monocultures, higher reagent concentration and incubation time increased fluorescent intensity. We found a reagent concentration of 10 % and an incubation time of 2 h suitable for all cell lines and both hydrogels. In multicellular 3D cultures, PrestoBlue and AlamarBlue assays detected similar cell responses upon drug treatment but overestimated cell growth. We recommend to assess cell viability and growth in conjunction with CyQuant assays that directly measure cell functions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51111,"journal":{"name":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 214116"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tailoring metabolic activity assays for tumour-engineered 3D models\",\"authors\":\"Julien Clegg , Rodrigo Curvello , Anastasiia Gabrielyan , Daniel Croagh , Sandra Hauser , Daniela Loessner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Monitoring cell behaviour in hydrogel-based 3D models is critical for assessing their growth and response to cytotoxic treatment. Resazurin-based PrestoBlue and AlamarBlue reagents are frequently used metabolic activity assays when determining cell responses. However, both assays are largely applied to cell monolayer cultures but yet to have a defined protocol for use in hydrogel-based 3D models. The assays' performance depends on the cell type, culture condition and measurement sensitivity. To better understand how both assays perform, we grew pancreatic cancer cells in gelatin methacryloyl and collagen hydrogels and evaluated their metabolic activity using different concentrations and incubation times of the PrestoBlue and AlamarBlue reagents. We tested reagent concentrations of 4 % and 10 % and incubation times of 45 min, 2 h and 4 h. In addition, we co-cultured cancer cells together with cancer-associated fibroblasts and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels and subjected them to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel to evaluate how both assays perform when characterising cell responses upon drug treatment. CyQuant assays were conducted on the same samples and compared to data from the metabolic activity assays. In cancer monocultures, higher reagent concentration and incubation time increased fluorescent intensity. We found a reagent concentration of 10 % and an incubation time of 2 h suitable for all cell lines and both hydrogels. In multicellular 3D cultures, PrestoBlue and AlamarBlue assays detected similar cell responses upon drug treatment but overestimated cell growth. We recommend to assess cell viability and growth in conjunction with CyQuant assays that directly measure cell functions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications\",\"volume\":\"167 \",\"pages\":\"Article 214116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772950824003595\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772950824003595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tailoring metabolic activity assays for tumour-engineered 3D models
Monitoring cell behaviour in hydrogel-based 3D models is critical for assessing their growth and response to cytotoxic treatment. Resazurin-based PrestoBlue and AlamarBlue reagents are frequently used metabolic activity assays when determining cell responses. However, both assays are largely applied to cell monolayer cultures but yet to have a defined protocol for use in hydrogel-based 3D models. The assays' performance depends on the cell type, culture condition and measurement sensitivity. To better understand how both assays perform, we grew pancreatic cancer cells in gelatin methacryloyl and collagen hydrogels and evaluated their metabolic activity using different concentrations and incubation times of the PrestoBlue and AlamarBlue reagents. We tested reagent concentrations of 4 % and 10 % and incubation times of 45 min, 2 h and 4 h. In addition, we co-cultured cancer cells together with cancer-associated fibroblasts and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels and subjected them to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel to evaluate how both assays perform when characterising cell responses upon drug treatment. CyQuant assays were conducted on the same samples and compared to data from the metabolic activity assays. In cancer monocultures, higher reagent concentration and incubation time increased fluorescent intensity. We found a reagent concentration of 10 % and an incubation time of 2 h suitable for all cell lines and both hydrogels. In multicellular 3D cultures, PrestoBlue and AlamarBlue assays detected similar cell responses upon drug treatment but overestimated cell growth. We recommend to assess cell viability and growth in conjunction with CyQuant assays that directly measure cell functions.
期刊介绍:
Biomaterials Advances, previously known as Materials Science and Engineering: C-Materials for Biological Applications (P-ISSN: 0928-4931, E-ISSN: 1873-0191). Includes topics at the interface of the biomedical sciences and materials engineering. These topics include:
• Bioinspired and biomimetic materials for medical applications
• Materials of biological origin for medical applications
• Materials for "active" medical applications
• Self-assembling and self-healing materials for medical applications
• "Smart" (i.e., stimulus-response) materials for medical applications
• Ceramic, metallic, polymeric, and composite materials for medical applications
• Materials for in vivo sensing
• Materials for in vivo imaging
• Materials for delivery of pharmacologic agents and vaccines
• Novel approaches for characterizing and modeling materials for medical applications
Manuscripts on biological topics without a materials science component, or manuscripts on materials science without biological applications, will not be considered for publication in Materials Science and Engineering C. New submissions are first assessed for language, scope and originality (plagiarism check) and can be desk rejected before review if they need English language improvements, are out of scope or present excessive duplication with published sources.
Biomaterials Advances sits within Elsevier''s biomaterials science portfolio alongside Biomaterials, Materials Today Bio and Biomaterials and Biosystems. As part of the broader Materials Today family, Biomaterials Advances offers authors rigorous peer review, rapid decisions, and high visibility. We look forward to receiving your submissions!