在双能计算机断层扫描中利用深度学习增强痛风诊断:晶体和伪影区分的回顾性分析

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keae523
Yunjung Choi, Riel Castro-Zunti, Daewoo Lee, Jae Sung Yun, Younhee Choi, Seok-bum Ko, Eun Jung Choi, Gong Yong Jin, Wan-Hee Yoo, Eun Hae Park
{"title":"在双能计算机断层扫描中利用深度学习增强痛风诊断:晶体和伪影区分的回顾性分析","authors":"Yunjung Choi, Riel Castro-Zunti, Daewoo Lee, Jae Sung Yun, Younhee Choi, Seok-bum Ko, Eun Jung Choi, Gong Yong Jin, Wan-Hee Yoo, Eun Hae Park","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keae523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To evaluate whether the application of deep learning (DL) could achieve high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between green colour coding, indicative of tophi, and clumpy artifacts observed in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) scans. Methods A comprehensive analysis of 18 704 regions of interest (ROIs) extracted from green foci in DECT scans obtained from 47 patients with gout and 27 gout-free controls was performed. The ROIs were categorized into three size groups: small, medium, and large. Convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis on a per-lesion basis and support vector machine (SVM) analysis on a per-patient basis were performed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the models were compared. Results For small ROIs, the sensitivity and specificity of the CNN model were 81.5% and 96.1%, respectively; for medium ROIs, 82.7% and 96.1%, respectively; for large ROIs, 91.8% and 86.9%, respectively. Additionally, the DL algorithm exhibited accuracies of 88.5%, 88.6%, and 91.0% for small, medium, and large ROIs, respectively. In the per-patient analysis, the SVM approach demonstrated a sensitivity of 87.2%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 91.8% in distinguishing between patients with gout and gout-free controls. Conclusion Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of the DL algorithm in differentiating between green colour coding indicative of crystal deposition and clumpy artifacts in DECT scans. With high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, the utilization of DL in DECT for diagnosing gout enables precise lesion classification, facilitating early-stage diagnosis and promoting timely intervention approaches.","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Gout Diagnosis with Deep Learning in Dual-energy Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Analysis of Crystal and Artifact Differentiation\",\"authors\":\"Yunjung Choi, Riel Castro-Zunti, Daewoo Lee, Jae Sung Yun, Younhee Choi, Seok-bum Ko, Eun Jung Choi, Gong Yong Jin, Wan-Hee Yoo, Eun Hae Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rheumatology/keae523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives To evaluate whether the application of deep learning (DL) could achieve high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between green colour coding, indicative of tophi, and clumpy artifacts observed in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) scans. Methods A comprehensive analysis of 18 704 regions of interest (ROIs) extracted from green foci in DECT scans obtained from 47 patients with gout and 27 gout-free controls was performed. The ROIs were categorized into three size groups: small, medium, and large. Convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis on a per-lesion basis and support vector machine (SVM) analysis on a per-patient basis were performed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the models were compared. Results For small ROIs, the sensitivity and specificity of the CNN model were 81.5% and 96.1%, respectively; for medium ROIs, 82.7% and 96.1%, respectively; for large ROIs, 91.8% and 86.9%, respectively. Additionally, the DL algorithm exhibited accuracies of 88.5%, 88.6%, and 91.0% for small, medium, and large ROIs, respectively. In the per-patient analysis, the SVM approach demonstrated a sensitivity of 87.2%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 91.8% in distinguishing between patients with gout and gout-free controls. Conclusion Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of the DL algorithm in differentiating between green colour coding indicative of crystal deposition and clumpy artifacts in DECT scans. With high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, the utilization of DL in DECT for diagnosing gout enables precise lesion classification, facilitating early-stage diagnosis and promoting timely intervention approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae523\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae523","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评估深度学习(DL)的应用是否能在区分双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)中观察到的指示性软骨病的绿色编码和团块状伪影方面达到较高的诊断准确性。方法 对从 47 名痛风患者和 27 名无痛风的对照组 DECT 扫描绿色病灶中提取的 18 704 个感兴趣区(ROI)进行了综合分析。ROI 被分为三个大小组:小型、中型和大型。对每个病灶进行卷积神经网络(CNN)分析,对每个患者进行支持向量机(SVM)分析。比较了模型的接收者操作特征曲线下面积、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果 对于小的 ROI,CNN 模型的灵敏度和特异性分别为 81.5% 和 96.1%;对于中等 ROI,灵敏度和特异性分别为 82.7% 和 96.1%;对于大的 ROI,灵敏度和特异性分别为 91.8% 和 86.9%。此外,DL 算法对小型、中型和大型 ROI 的准确率分别为 88.5%、88.6% 和 91.0%。在对每个患者的分析中,SVM 方法在区分痛风患者和无痛风的对照组方面的灵敏度为 87.2%,特异性为 100%,准确率为 91.8%。结论 我们的研究证明了 DL 算法在区分指示晶体沉积的绿色编码和 DECT 扫描中的结块伪影方面的有效性。在 DECT 中使用 DL 诊断痛风具有较高的灵敏度、特异性和准确性,可对病变进行精确分类,有助于早期诊断和及时干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing Gout Diagnosis with Deep Learning in Dual-energy Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Analysis of Crystal and Artifact Differentiation
Objectives To evaluate whether the application of deep learning (DL) could achieve high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between green colour coding, indicative of tophi, and clumpy artifacts observed in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) scans. Methods A comprehensive analysis of 18 704 regions of interest (ROIs) extracted from green foci in DECT scans obtained from 47 patients with gout and 27 gout-free controls was performed. The ROIs were categorized into three size groups: small, medium, and large. Convolutional neural network (CNN) analysis on a per-lesion basis and support vector machine (SVM) analysis on a per-patient basis were performed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the models were compared. Results For small ROIs, the sensitivity and specificity of the CNN model were 81.5% and 96.1%, respectively; for medium ROIs, 82.7% and 96.1%, respectively; for large ROIs, 91.8% and 86.9%, respectively. Additionally, the DL algorithm exhibited accuracies of 88.5%, 88.6%, and 91.0% for small, medium, and large ROIs, respectively. In the per-patient analysis, the SVM approach demonstrated a sensitivity of 87.2%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 91.8% in distinguishing between patients with gout and gout-free controls. Conclusion Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of the DL algorithm in differentiating between green colour coding indicative of crystal deposition and clumpy artifacts in DECT scans. With high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, the utilization of DL in DECT for diagnosing gout enables precise lesion classification, facilitating early-stage diagnosis and promoting timely intervention approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
期刊最新文献
A case with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis treated with tofacitinib and rapamycin. 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-NaF PET/CT in psoriatic arthritis: a comparative study. A mobile app to support self-management and remotely monitor disease impact in rheumatoid arthritis: the randomised controlled AEGORA trial. Do SMS/e-mail reminders increase influenza vaccination of rheumatoid arthritis patients under anti-TNF: a nested randomized controlled trial in the ART e-cohort. Enhancing Gout Diagnosis with Deep Learning in Dual-energy Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Analysis of Crystal and Artifact Differentiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1