Jinyeong Bak, Manh Long Doan, Seongbae Park, Jae Jun Jeong, Byongjo Yun
{"title":"利用 CFD 代码建立大直径管道中绝热气水流的局部两组气泡大小模型","authors":"Jinyeong Bak, Manh Long Doan, Seongbae Park, Jae Jun Jeong, Byongjo Yun","doi":"10.1016/j.csite.2024.105483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate prediction of bubble behavior in large diameter pipes is crucial for evaluating the performance of safety systems, steam generators, and heat exchangers in nuclear systems. Bubble behavior in large diameter pipes under two-phase flow significantly differs from that in small pipes. With the increasing use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes, predicting interfacial area concentration (IAC) is critical for understanding multi-dimensional bubble behavior. This study developed a two-group local bubble size model for bubbly, slug, and churn flows under adiabatic conditions. The model includes correlations for void fraction and bubble sizes of two groups, which were implemented into CFD codes and validated against experimental data from large diameter pipes with low-pressure air–water flow. Results show the model's prediction accuracy surpasses existing correlations. The developed correlations are applicable across a range of flow conditions covering pipe diameters in the range 0.05–0.152 <ce:italic>m</ce:italic>, pressures from atmospheric to 300 kPa, superficial liquid velocities from 0.25 m/s to 2.85 m/s, and superficial gas velocities from 0.04 m/s to 5.48 m/s. The model is expected to enhance the prediction capabilities of CFD codes for the adiabatic two-group two-phase flows in the large diameter pipes.","PeriodicalId":9658,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","volume":"132 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local two-group bubble size model for adiabatic air–water flow in a large diameter pipe using CFD code\",\"authors\":\"Jinyeong Bak, Manh Long Doan, Seongbae Park, Jae Jun Jeong, Byongjo Yun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csite.2024.105483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurate prediction of bubble behavior in large diameter pipes is crucial for evaluating the performance of safety systems, steam generators, and heat exchangers in nuclear systems. Bubble behavior in large diameter pipes under two-phase flow significantly differs from that in small pipes. With the increasing use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes, predicting interfacial area concentration (IAC) is critical for understanding multi-dimensional bubble behavior. This study developed a two-group local bubble size model for bubbly, slug, and churn flows under adiabatic conditions. The model includes correlations for void fraction and bubble sizes of two groups, which were implemented into CFD codes and validated against experimental data from large diameter pipes with low-pressure air–water flow. Results show the model's prediction accuracy surpasses existing correlations. The developed correlations are applicable across a range of flow conditions covering pipe diameters in the range 0.05–0.152 <ce:italic>m</ce:italic>, pressures from atmospheric to 300 kPa, superficial liquid velocities from 0.25 m/s to 2.85 m/s, and superficial gas velocities from 0.04 m/s to 5.48 m/s. The model is expected to enhance the prediction capabilities of CFD codes for the adiabatic two-group two-phase flows in the large diameter pipes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"volume\":\"132 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.105483\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"THERMODYNAMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.105483","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Local two-group bubble size model for adiabatic air–water flow in a large diameter pipe using CFD code
Accurate prediction of bubble behavior in large diameter pipes is crucial for evaluating the performance of safety systems, steam generators, and heat exchangers in nuclear systems. Bubble behavior in large diameter pipes under two-phase flow significantly differs from that in small pipes. With the increasing use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes, predicting interfacial area concentration (IAC) is critical for understanding multi-dimensional bubble behavior. This study developed a two-group local bubble size model for bubbly, slug, and churn flows under adiabatic conditions. The model includes correlations for void fraction and bubble sizes of two groups, which were implemented into CFD codes and validated against experimental data from large diameter pipes with low-pressure air–water flow. Results show the model's prediction accuracy surpasses existing correlations. The developed correlations are applicable across a range of flow conditions covering pipe diameters in the range 0.05–0.152 m, pressures from atmospheric to 300 kPa, superficial liquid velocities from 0.25 m/s to 2.85 m/s, and superficial gas velocities from 0.04 m/s to 5.48 m/s. The model is expected to enhance the prediction capabilities of CFD codes for the adiabatic two-group two-phase flows in the large diameter pipes.
期刊介绍:
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering provides a forum for the rapid publication of short, structured Case Studies in Thermal Engineering and related Short Communications. It provides an essential compendium of case studies for researchers and practitioners in the field of thermal engineering and others who are interested in aspects of thermal engineering cases that could affect other engineering processes. The journal not only publishes new and novel case studies, but also provides a forum for the publication of high quality descriptions of classic thermal engineering problems. The scope of the journal includes case studies of thermal engineering problems in components, devices and systems using existing experimental and numerical techniques in the areas of mechanical, aerospace, chemical, medical, thermal management for electronics, heat exchangers, regeneration, solar thermal energy, thermal storage, building energy conservation, and power generation. Case studies of thermal problems in other areas will also be considered.