{"title":"通过对实验室规模地震的数值模拟和无监督机器学习揭示地震成核的启示。","authors":"Sheng Hua Ye, Semechah K Y Lui, R Paul Young","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-80136-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding earthquake nucleation is vital for predicting and mitigating seismic events, saving lives, and enhancing construction practices in earthquake-prone areas. Cascade triggering and preslip triggering are prevalent theories, posing challenges in differentiation based on field observations. Our study employs a novel unsupervised machine learning pipeline, integrating macroscopic- and grain-scale data from stick-slip experiments in a discrete element method (DEM) framework. Running 27 simulations, we cluster foreshocks and mainshocks separately and assess their correlation. The study supports the cascade triggering model on the macro-scale, as we did not observe any scaling between nucleation parameters and the mainshock size. On the other hand, further grain-scale analysis identifies that, separate from Coulomb stress transfer, there is an additional mechanism related to shear stress accumulation on the fault, which is likely the preslip triggering. Overall, while foreshocks may not directly influence the trend at which contact force evolves, they could prime the fault for dynamic rupture by increasing the proportion of contacts accumulating shear stresses. Our findings infer the possible coexistence of the two theorized mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"28812"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights on earthquake nucleation revealed by numerical simulation and unsupervised machine learning of laboratory-scale earthquake.\",\"authors\":\"Sheng Hua Ye, Semechah K Y Lui, R Paul Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-024-80136-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding earthquake nucleation is vital for predicting and mitigating seismic events, saving lives, and enhancing construction practices in earthquake-prone areas. Cascade triggering and preslip triggering are prevalent theories, posing challenges in differentiation based on field observations. Our study employs a novel unsupervised machine learning pipeline, integrating macroscopic- and grain-scale data from stick-slip experiments in a discrete element method (DEM) framework. Running 27 simulations, we cluster foreshocks and mainshocks separately and assess their correlation. The study supports the cascade triggering model on the macro-scale, as we did not observe any scaling between nucleation parameters and the mainshock size. On the other hand, further grain-scale analysis identifies that, separate from Coulomb stress transfer, there is an additional mechanism related to shear stress accumulation on the fault, which is likely the preslip triggering. Overall, while foreshocks may not directly influence the trend at which contact force evolves, they could prime the fault for dynamic rupture by increasing the proportion of contacts accumulating shear stresses. Our findings infer the possible coexistence of the two theorized mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"28812\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579008/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80136-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80136-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Insights on earthquake nucleation revealed by numerical simulation and unsupervised machine learning of laboratory-scale earthquake.
Understanding earthquake nucleation is vital for predicting and mitigating seismic events, saving lives, and enhancing construction practices in earthquake-prone areas. Cascade triggering and preslip triggering are prevalent theories, posing challenges in differentiation based on field observations. Our study employs a novel unsupervised machine learning pipeline, integrating macroscopic- and grain-scale data from stick-slip experiments in a discrete element method (DEM) framework. Running 27 simulations, we cluster foreshocks and mainshocks separately and assess their correlation. The study supports the cascade triggering model on the macro-scale, as we did not observe any scaling between nucleation parameters and the mainshock size. On the other hand, further grain-scale analysis identifies that, separate from Coulomb stress transfer, there is an additional mechanism related to shear stress accumulation on the fault, which is likely the preslip triggering. Overall, while foreshocks may not directly influence the trend at which contact force evolves, they could prime the fault for dynamic rupture by increasing the proportion of contacts accumulating shear stresses. Our findings infer the possible coexistence of the two theorized mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.