在混合拼车和非拼车市场中模拟途中拼车服务的影响

IF 5.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part B-Methodological Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.trb.2024.103106
Jun Wang, Manzi Li, Xiaolei Wang, Hai Yang
{"title":"在混合拼车和非拼车市场中模拟途中拼车服务的影响","authors":"Jun Wang, Manzi Li, Xiaolei Wang, Hai Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.trb.2024.103106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"En-route ride-pooling services, e.g. Didi Pinche, UberPool, have been considered a promising way to alleviate traffic congestion during rush hours. Yet in reality, its market share is still small compared to non-pooling service. For a ride-hailing platform that provides both en-route pooling and non-pooling services, this paper endeavors to answer under what circumstance would it have incentive to encourage ride-pooling, and whether drivers, riders, the platform and the society can simultaneously benefit from the introduction of en-route ride-pooling service. We propose an aggregate model to characterize the equilibrium of a ride-hailing market where a platform operates a fleet of vehicles to provide en-route pooling and non-pooling services. The model captures the complex interactions among riders’ mode choices between pooling and non-pooling, the waiting times of pooling and non-pooling users, the pairing probability and the expected detour time of pooling users, the matching rates of cruising and halfly occupied vehicles with different types of riders, and the numbers of cruising, halfly occupied and fully occupied vehicles at each instant. Based on the model, we theoretically reveal the impacts of the total ride-hailing demand, vehicle fleet size, and the platform’s pricing and vehicle dispatching strategies on the market equilibrium performance through partial derivative-based sensitivity analysis, and establish conditions under which the introduction of en-route ride-pooling service improves platform profit, driver income, rider utility and social welfare.","PeriodicalId":54418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling the impacts of en-route ride-pooling service in a mixed pooling and non-pooling market\",\"authors\":\"Jun Wang, Manzi Li, Xiaolei Wang, Hai Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trb.2024.103106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"En-route ride-pooling services, e.g. Didi Pinche, UberPool, have been considered a promising way to alleviate traffic congestion during rush hours. Yet in reality, its market share is still small compared to non-pooling service. For a ride-hailing platform that provides both en-route pooling and non-pooling services, this paper endeavors to answer under what circumstance would it have incentive to encourage ride-pooling, and whether drivers, riders, the platform and the society can simultaneously benefit from the introduction of en-route ride-pooling service. We propose an aggregate model to characterize the equilibrium of a ride-hailing market where a platform operates a fleet of vehicles to provide en-route pooling and non-pooling services. The model captures the complex interactions among riders’ mode choices between pooling and non-pooling, the waiting times of pooling and non-pooling users, the pairing probability and the expected detour time of pooling users, the matching rates of cruising and halfly occupied vehicles with different types of riders, and the numbers of cruising, halfly occupied and fully occupied vehicles at each instant. Based on the model, we theoretically reveal the impacts of the total ride-hailing demand, vehicle fleet size, and the platform’s pricing and vehicle dispatching strategies on the market equilibrium performance through partial derivative-based sensitivity analysis, and establish conditions under which the introduction of en-route ride-pooling service improves platform profit, driver income, rider utility and social welfare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2024.103106\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2024.103106","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

途中拼车服务(如滴滴拼车、UberPool)一直被认为是缓解高峰时段交通拥堵的有效途径。但实际上,与非拼车服务相比,其市场份额仍然很小。对于一个同时提供途中拼车和非拼车服务的打车平台来说,本文试图回答在什么情况下它有动力鼓励拼车,以及司机、乘客、平台和社会是否能同时从引入途中拼车服务中获益。我们提出了一个综合模型来描述一个平台运营车队提供途中拼车和非拼车服务的打车市场的均衡状态。该模型捕捉了乘客在拼车和非拼车之间的模式选择、拼车用户和非拼车用户的等待时间、拼车用户的配对概率和预期绕行时间、巡航车辆和半占车辆与不同类型乘客的匹配率,以及每一瞬间巡航车辆、半占车辆和全占车辆的数量之间复杂的相互作用。基于该模型,我们通过基于偏导数的敏感性分析,从理论上揭示了乘车总需求、车队规模、平台定价和车辆调度策略对市场均衡表现的影响,并确定了引入途中拼车服务提高平台利润、司机收入、乘客效用和社会福利的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modelling the impacts of en-route ride-pooling service in a mixed pooling and non-pooling market
En-route ride-pooling services, e.g. Didi Pinche, UberPool, have been considered a promising way to alleviate traffic congestion during rush hours. Yet in reality, its market share is still small compared to non-pooling service. For a ride-hailing platform that provides both en-route pooling and non-pooling services, this paper endeavors to answer under what circumstance would it have incentive to encourage ride-pooling, and whether drivers, riders, the platform and the society can simultaneously benefit from the introduction of en-route ride-pooling service. We propose an aggregate model to characterize the equilibrium of a ride-hailing market where a platform operates a fleet of vehicles to provide en-route pooling and non-pooling services. The model captures the complex interactions among riders’ mode choices between pooling and non-pooling, the waiting times of pooling and non-pooling users, the pairing probability and the expected detour time of pooling users, the matching rates of cruising and halfly occupied vehicles with different types of riders, and the numbers of cruising, halfly occupied and fully occupied vehicles at each instant. Based on the model, we theoretically reveal the impacts of the total ride-hailing demand, vehicle fleet size, and the platform’s pricing and vehicle dispatching strategies on the market equilibrium performance through partial derivative-based sensitivity analysis, and establish conditions under which the introduction of en-route ride-pooling service improves platform profit, driver income, rider utility and social welfare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Part B-Methodological
Transportation Research Part B-Methodological 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
8.80%
发文量
143
审稿时长
14.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part B publishes papers on all methodological aspects of the subject, particularly those that require mathematical analysis. The general theme of the journal is the development and solution of problems that are adequately motivated to deal with important aspects of the design and/or analysis of transportation systems. Areas covered include: traffic flow; design and analysis of transportation networks; control and scheduling; optimization; queuing theory; logistics; supply chains; development and application of statistical, econometric and mathematical models to address transportation problems; cost models; pricing and/or investment; traveler or shipper behavior; cost-benefit methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Modelling the impacts of en-route ride-pooling service in a mixed pooling and non-pooling market Amachine learning technique embedded reference-dependent choice model for explanatory power improvement: Shifting of reference point as a key factor in vehicle purchase decision-making Making the most of your private parking slot: Strategy-proof double auctions-enabled staggered sharing schemes Editorial Board Safety, liability, and insurance markets in the age of automated driving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1