桡骨远端骨折后复杂区域疼痛综合征:当前做法调查。

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0314307
Alice Wei Ting Wang, Kelly A Lefaivre, Jeffrey Potter, Aresh Sepehri, Pierre Guy, Henry Broekhuyse, Darren M Roffey, David J Stockton
{"title":"桡骨远端骨折后复杂区域疼痛综合征:当前做法调查。","authors":"Alice Wei Ting Wang, Kelly A Lefaivre, Jeffrey Potter, Aresh Sepehri, Pierre Guy, Henry Broekhuyse, Darren M Roffey, David J Stockton","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0314307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a common complication following distal radius fractures that is difficult to diagnose and can lead to permanent disability. While various proposed prophylaxis and treatment modalities exist, high-quality evidence guiding practice is limited. This survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) and Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA) members was conducted with the primary aim of assessing practice patterns in distal radius fractures complicated with CRPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey was distributed to practicing orthopaedic surgeons in the COA and OTA. Questions assessed practice setting, preference in management of distal radius fractures and CRPS, comfort level in managing CRPS, and identification of gaps in management. Responses were anonymized and collected over 8 months. Response data was analyzed using descriptive statistics; thematic analysis was used on free text response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>134 survey responses were completed. 84% of respondents felt the incidence of CRPS in distal radius fractures was 1-10%, while 15% felt it was closer to 11-20%. 24% of respondents utilized the \"Budapest Criteria\" to diagnose CRPS. 40% offered prophylaxis in patients felt to be at high risk of developing CRPS. 66% of surgeons felt neutral, uncomfortable, or very uncomfortable managing CRPS in distal radius fractures. When asked to consider adopting a prophylactic therapy, 38% of surgeons indicated that a therapy that reduced the absolute risk of CRPS by 6-10% would change their practice. Gaps in current practice included lack of evidence-based treatment and prevention strategies and diagnostic uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified that amongst orthopaedic surgeons in the COA and OTA, diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis strategies for CRPS in distal radius fractures are heterogeneous. Surgeons are not confident in their treatment of CRPS. Future studies using rigorous research methods are warranted to improve management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 11","pages":"e0314307"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex regional pain syndrome after distal radius fracture: A survey of current practices.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Wei Ting Wang, Kelly A Lefaivre, Jeffrey Potter, Aresh Sepehri, Pierre Guy, Henry Broekhuyse, Darren M Roffey, David J Stockton\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0314307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a common complication following distal radius fractures that is difficult to diagnose and can lead to permanent disability. While various proposed prophylaxis and treatment modalities exist, high-quality evidence guiding practice is limited. This survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) and Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA) members was conducted with the primary aim of assessing practice patterns in distal radius fractures complicated with CRPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey was distributed to practicing orthopaedic surgeons in the COA and OTA. Questions assessed practice setting, preference in management of distal radius fractures and CRPS, comfort level in managing CRPS, and identification of gaps in management. Responses were anonymized and collected over 8 months. Response data was analyzed using descriptive statistics; thematic analysis was used on free text response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>134 survey responses were completed. 84% of respondents felt the incidence of CRPS in distal radius fractures was 1-10%, while 15% felt it was closer to 11-20%. 24% of respondents utilized the \\\"Budapest Criteria\\\" to diagnose CRPS. 40% offered prophylaxis in patients felt to be at high risk of developing CRPS. 66% of surgeons felt neutral, uncomfortable, or very uncomfortable managing CRPS in distal radius fractures. When asked to consider adopting a prophylactic therapy, 38% of surgeons indicated that a therapy that reduced the absolute risk of CRPS by 6-10% would change their practice. Gaps in current practice included lack of evidence-based treatment and prevention strategies and diagnostic uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified that amongst orthopaedic surgeons in the COA and OTA, diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis strategies for CRPS in distal radius fractures are heterogeneous. Surgeons are not confident in their treatment of CRPS. Future studies using rigorous research methods are warranted to improve management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"19 11\",\"pages\":\"e0314307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581307/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314307\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)是桡骨远端骨折后常见的并发症,难以诊断,可导致终身残疾。虽然存在各种预防和治疗方法,但指导实践的高质量证据却很有限。本调查针对创伤骨科协会(OTA)和加拿大骨科协会(COA)成员进行,主要目的是评估桡骨远端骨折并发 CRPS 的实践模式:向 COA 和 OTA 的执业矫形外科医生分发了一份电子调查表。调查问题包括执业环境、对桡骨远端骨折和 CRPS 的管理偏好、管理 CRPS 的舒适度以及管理中的不足之处。回答均为匿名,收集时间为 8 个月。采用描述性统计对回复数据进行分析;对自由文本回复进行主题分析:共完成 134 份调查回复。84%的受访者认为桡骨远端骨折 CRPS 的发病率为 1-10%,15%的受访者认为发病率接近 11-20%。24%的受访者使用 "布达佩斯标准 "诊断 CRPS。40%的受访者认为患者患CRPS的风险很高,因此为其提供了预防措施。66%的外科医生在处理桡骨远端骨折的CRPS时感到中立、不舒服或非常不舒服。当被问及是否考虑采用预防性疗法时,38% 的外科医生表示,如果能将 CRPS 的绝对风险降低 6-10% 就会改变他们的做法。当前实践中存在的不足包括缺乏循证治疗和预防策略以及诊断的不确定性:本研究发现,COA 和 OTA 的骨科医生对桡骨远端骨折 CRPS 的诊断、治疗和预防策略存在差异。外科医生对 CRPS 的治疗缺乏信心。今后有必要使用严格的研究方法进行研究,以改善管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Complex regional pain syndrome after distal radius fracture: A survey of current practices.

Introduction: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a common complication following distal radius fractures that is difficult to diagnose and can lead to permanent disability. While various proposed prophylaxis and treatment modalities exist, high-quality evidence guiding practice is limited. This survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) and Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA) members was conducted with the primary aim of assessing practice patterns in distal radius fractures complicated with CRPS.

Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to practicing orthopaedic surgeons in the COA and OTA. Questions assessed practice setting, preference in management of distal radius fractures and CRPS, comfort level in managing CRPS, and identification of gaps in management. Responses were anonymized and collected over 8 months. Response data was analyzed using descriptive statistics; thematic analysis was used on free text response.

Results: 134 survey responses were completed. 84% of respondents felt the incidence of CRPS in distal radius fractures was 1-10%, while 15% felt it was closer to 11-20%. 24% of respondents utilized the "Budapest Criteria" to diagnose CRPS. 40% offered prophylaxis in patients felt to be at high risk of developing CRPS. 66% of surgeons felt neutral, uncomfortable, or very uncomfortable managing CRPS in distal radius fractures. When asked to consider adopting a prophylactic therapy, 38% of surgeons indicated that a therapy that reduced the absolute risk of CRPS by 6-10% would change their practice. Gaps in current practice included lack of evidence-based treatment and prevention strategies and diagnostic uncertainty.

Conclusion: This study identified that amongst orthopaedic surgeons in the COA and OTA, diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis strategies for CRPS in distal radius fractures are heterogeneous. Surgeons are not confident in their treatment of CRPS. Future studies using rigorous research methods are warranted to improve management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
Chemical fractions of potassium in arid region calcareous soils: The impact of microclimates and physiographic variability. Is transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation effective and safe for primary insomnia? A PRISMA-compliant protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Comparison of haemoglobin concentration measurements using HemoCue-301 and Sysmex XN-Series 1500: A survey among anaemic Gambian infants aged 6-12 months. Clinical predictors of physiologic change after treatment with immunosuppression in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Juvenile detachment, an early sign of departure from parental care, in the leech Orientobdelloides siamensis (Oka, 1917).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1