急性前循环非盲窦性脑梗塞缺血区放射组学结果预测比较

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain communications Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcae393
Xiang Zhou, Jinxi Meng, Kangwei Zhang, Hui Zheng, Qian Xi, Yifeng Peng, Xiaowen Xu, Jianjun Gu, Qing Xia, Lai Wei, Peijun Wang
{"title":"急性前循环非盲窦性脑梗塞缺血区放射组学结果预测比较","authors":"Xiang Zhou, Jinxi Meng, Kangwei Zhang, Hui Zheng, Qian Xi, Yifeng Peng, Xiaowen Xu, Jianjun Gu, Qing Xia, Lai Wei, Peijun Wang","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcae393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The outcome prediction of acute anterior circulation non-lacunar infarction (AACNLI) is important for the precise clinical treatment of this disease. However, the accuracy of prognosis prediction is still limited. This study aims to develop and compare machine learning models based on MRI radiomics of multiple ischaemic-related areas for prognostic prediction in AACNLI. This retrospective multicentre study consecutively included 372 AACNLI patients receiving MRI examinations and conventional therapy between October 2020 and February 2023. These were grouped into training set, internal test set and external test set. MRI radiomics features were extracted from the mask diffusion-weighted imaging, mask apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and mask ADC620 by AACNLI segmentations. Grid search parameter tuning was performed on 12 feature selection and 9 machine learning algorithms, and algorithm combinations with the smallest rank-sum of area under the curve (AUC) was selected for model construction. The performances of all models were evaluated in the internal and external test sets. The AUC of radiomics model was larger than that of non-radiomics model with the same machine learning algorithm in the three mask types. The radiomics model using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-random forest algorithm combination gained the smallest AUC rank-sum among all the algorithm combinations. The AUC of the model with ADC620 was 0.98 in the internal test set and 0.91 in the external test set, and the weighted average AUC in the three sets was 0.96, the largest among three mask types. The Shapley additive explanations values of the maximum of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score within 7 days from onset (7-d NIHSS<sub>max</sub>), stroke-associated pneumonia and admission Glasgow coma scale score ranked top three among the features in AACNLI outcome prediction. In conclusion, the random forest model with mask ADC620 can accurately predict the AACNLI outcome and reveal the risk factors leading to the poor prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"6 6","pages":"fcae393"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome prediction comparison of ischaemic areas' radiomics in acute anterior circulation non-lacunar infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Xiang Zhou, Jinxi Meng, Kangwei Zhang, Hui Zheng, Qian Xi, Yifeng Peng, Xiaowen Xu, Jianjun Gu, Qing Xia, Lai Wei, Peijun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/braincomms/fcae393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The outcome prediction of acute anterior circulation non-lacunar infarction (AACNLI) is important for the precise clinical treatment of this disease. However, the accuracy of prognosis prediction is still limited. This study aims to develop and compare machine learning models based on MRI radiomics of multiple ischaemic-related areas for prognostic prediction in AACNLI. This retrospective multicentre study consecutively included 372 AACNLI patients receiving MRI examinations and conventional therapy between October 2020 and February 2023. These were grouped into training set, internal test set and external test set. MRI radiomics features were extracted from the mask diffusion-weighted imaging, mask apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and mask ADC620 by AACNLI segmentations. Grid search parameter tuning was performed on 12 feature selection and 9 machine learning algorithms, and algorithm combinations with the smallest rank-sum of area under the curve (AUC) was selected for model construction. The performances of all models were evaluated in the internal and external test sets. The AUC of radiomics model was larger than that of non-radiomics model with the same machine learning algorithm in the three mask types. The radiomics model using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-random forest algorithm combination gained the smallest AUC rank-sum among all the algorithm combinations. The AUC of the model with ADC620 was 0.98 in the internal test set and 0.91 in the external test set, and the weighted average AUC in the three sets was 0.96, the largest among three mask types. The Shapley additive explanations values of the maximum of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score within 7 days from onset (7-d NIHSS<sub>max</sub>), stroke-associated pneumonia and admission Glasgow coma scale score ranked top three among the features in AACNLI outcome prediction. In conclusion, the random forest model with mask ADC620 can accurately predict the AACNLI outcome and reveal the risk factors leading to the poor prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain communications\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"fcae393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580218/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性前循环非月腔梗死(AACNLI)的预后预测对于该病的精确临床治疗非常重要。然而,预后预测的准确性仍然有限。本研究旨在开发和比较基于多个缺血相关区域核磁共振成像放射组学的机器学习模型,以预测 AACNLI 的预后。这项回顾性多中心研究连续纳入了2020年10月至2023年2月期间接受磁共振成像检查和常规治疗的372例AACNLI患者。这些患者被分为训练集、内部测试集和外部测试集。通过AACNLI分割从掩膜扩散加权成像、掩膜表观扩散系数(ADC)和掩膜ADC620中提取磁共振成像放射组学特征。对 12 种特征选择算法和 9 种机器学习算法进行了网格搜索参数调整,选择曲线下面积(AUC)秩和最小的算法组合构建模型。在内部和外部测试集中对所有模型的性能进行了评估。在三种掩膜类型中,采用相同机器学习算法的放射组学模型的 AUC 均大于非放射组学模型。在所有算法组合中,使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子-随机森林算法组合的放射组学模型获得的 AUC 秩和最小。使用 ADC620 的模型在内部测试集中的 AUC 为 0.98,在外部测试集中的 AUC 为 0.91,三个测试集中的加权平均 AUC 为 0.96,是三种掩膜类型中最大的。发病 7 天内美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分最大值(7-d NIHSSmax)、卒中相关肺炎和入院格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的 Shapley 加性解释值在 AACNLI 结局预测特征中排名前三。总之,掩膜 ADC620 的随机森林模型可以准确预测 AACNLI 的预后,并揭示导致预后不良的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcome prediction comparison of ischaemic areas' radiomics in acute anterior circulation non-lacunar infarction.

The outcome prediction of acute anterior circulation non-lacunar infarction (AACNLI) is important for the precise clinical treatment of this disease. However, the accuracy of prognosis prediction is still limited. This study aims to develop and compare machine learning models based on MRI radiomics of multiple ischaemic-related areas for prognostic prediction in AACNLI. This retrospective multicentre study consecutively included 372 AACNLI patients receiving MRI examinations and conventional therapy between October 2020 and February 2023. These were grouped into training set, internal test set and external test set. MRI radiomics features were extracted from the mask diffusion-weighted imaging, mask apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and mask ADC620 by AACNLI segmentations. Grid search parameter tuning was performed on 12 feature selection and 9 machine learning algorithms, and algorithm combinations with the smallest rank-sum of area under the curve (AUC) was selected for model construction. The performances of all models were evaluated in the internal and external test sets. The AUC of radiomics model was larger than that of non-radiomics model with the same machine learning algorithm in the three mask types. The radiomics model using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-random forest algorithm combination gained the smallest AUC rank-sum among all the algorithm combinations. The AUC of the model with ADC620 was 0.98 in the internal test set and 0.91 in the external test set, and the weighted average AUC in the three sets was 0.96, the largest among three mask types. The Shapley additive explanations values of the maximum of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score within 7 days from onset (7-d NIHSSmax), stroke-associated pneumonia and admission Glasgow coma scale score ranked top three among the features in AACNLI outcome prediction. In conclusion, the random forest model with mask ADC620 can accurately predict the AACNLI outcome and reveal the risk factors leading to the poor prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Loss of tissue-type plasminogen activator causes multiple developmental anomalies. Mapping sentence comprehension and syntactic complexity: evidence from 131 stroke survivors. Outcome prediction comparison of ischaemic areas' radiomics in acute anterior circulation non-lacunar infarction. Overcoming genetic neuromuscular diagnostic pitfalls in a middle-income country. Concussion leads to opposing sensorimotor effects of habituation deficit and fatigue in zebrafish larvae.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1