跨学科多模式疼痛治疗计划后治疗成功率的预测模型。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152592
Michel GCAM Mertens , Sander MJ van Kuijk , Laura WME Beckers , Fredrick Zmudzki , Bjorn Winkens , Rob JEM Smeets
{"title":"跨学科多模式疼痛治疗计划后治疗成功率的预测模型。","authors":"Michel GCAM Mertens ,&nbsp;Sander MJ van Kuijk ,&nbsp;Laura WME Beckers ,&nbsp;Fredrick Zmudzki ,&nbsp;Bjorn Winkens ,&nbsp;Rob JEM Smeets","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) poses a widespread health and socioeconomic problem, being the most prevalent chronic pain condition. Interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment (IMPT) is considered the gold standard, offering cost-effective long-term care. Unfortunately, only a subset of patients experiences clinically relevant improvements in pain, fatigue, and disability post-IMPT. Establishing a prediction model encompassing various outcome measures could enhance rehabilitation and personalized healthcare. Thus, the aim was to develop and validate a prediction model for IMPT success in patients with CMP. A prospective cohort study within routine care was performed, including patients with CMP undergoing a 10-week IMPT. Success across four outcome measures was determined: patients' recovery perspective, quality of life (physical and mental), and disability. Sixty-five demographic and candidate predictors (mainly patient reported outcome measures) were examined. Finally, 2309 patients participated, with IMPT success rates ranging from 30% to 57%. Four models incorporating 33 predictors were developed, with treatment control being the sole consistent predictor across all models. Additionally, predictors effects varied in direction in the models. All models demonstrated strong calibration, fair to good discrimination, and were internally validated (optimism-corrected AUC range 0.69–0.80). Our findings show that treatment success can be predicted using standardized patient-reported measures, exhibiting strong discriminatory power. However, predictors vary depending on the outcome, underscoring the importance of selecting the appropriate measure upfront. Clinically, these results suggest potential for patient-centered care and may contribute to the development of a scientifically sound decision tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 152592"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction models for treatment success after an interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment program\",\"authors\":\"Michel GCAM Mertens ,&nbsp;Sander MJ van Kuijk ,&nbsp;Laura WME Beckers ,&nbsp;Fredrick Zmudzki ,&nbsp;Bjorn Winkens ,&nbsp;Rob JEM Smeets\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) poses a widespread health and socioeconomic problem, being the most prevalent chronic pain condition. Interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment (IMPT) is considered the gold standard, offering cost-effective long-term care. Unfortunately, only a subset of patients experiences clinically relevant improvements in pain, fatigue, and disability post-IMPT. Establishing a prediction model encompassing various outcome measures could enhance rehabilitation and personalized healthcare. Thus, the aim was to develop and validate a prediction model for IMPT success in patients with CMP. A prospective cohort study within routine care was performed, including patients with CMP undergoing a 10-week IMPT. Success across four outcome measures was determined: patients' recovery perspective, quality of life (physical and mental), and disability. Sixty-five demographic and candidate predictors (mainly patient reported outcome measures) were examined. Finally, 2309 patients participated, with IMPT success rates ranging from 30% to 57%. Four models incorporating 33 predictors were developed, with treatment control being the sole consistent predictor across all models. Additionally, predictors effects varied in direction in the models. All models demonstrated strong calibration, fair to good discrimination, and were internally validated (optimism-corrected AUC range 0.69–0.80). Our findings show that treatment success can be predicted using standardized patient-reported measures, exhibiting strong discriminatory power. However, predictors vary depending on the outcome, underscoring the importance of selecting the appropriate measure upfront. Clinically, these results suggest potential for patient-centered care and may contribute to the development of a scientifically sound decision tool.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017224002324\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017224002324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛(CMP)是一个普遍的健康和社会经济问题,也是最常见的慢性疼痛症状。跨学科多模式疼痛治疗(IMPT)被认为是黄金标准,可提供具有成本效益的长期护理。遗憾的是,只有一部分患者在 IMPT 治疗后疼痛、疲劳和残疾状况得到了临床相关的改善。建立一个包含各种结果测量的预测模型可以提高康复和个性化医疗服务的水平。因此,我们的目标是开发并验证一个预测模型,用于预测 CMP 患者的 IMPT 成功率。研究人员在常规护理范围内开展了一项前瞻性队列研究,其中包括接受为期 10 周 IMPT 的 CMP 患者。研究确定了四项结果指标的成功率:患者的康复前景、生活质量(身体和精神)以及残疾情况。对 65 个人口统计学和候选预测因素(主要是患者报告的疗效指标)进行了研究。最后,2309 名患者参与了研究,IMPT 成功率从 30% 到 57% 不等。研究建立了包含 33 个预测因子的四个模型,其中治疗控制是所有模型中唯一一致的预测因子。此外,预测因子的影响在模型中的方向也各不相同。所有模型都显示出很强的校准性、公平到良好的区分度,并通过了内部验证(乐观校正 AUC 范围为 0.69-0.80)。我们的研究结果表明,使用标准化的患者报告指标可以预测治疗成功,并表现出很强的判别能力。然而,预测因素因结果而异,这就强调了前期选择适当测量方法的重要性。在临床上,这些结果表明以患者为中心的护理具有潜力,并可能有助于开发科学合理的决策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction models for treatment success after an interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment program
Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) poses a widespread health and socioeconomic problem, being the most prevalent chronic pain condition. Interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment (IMPT) is considered the gold standard, offering cost-effective long-term care. Unfortunately, only a subset of patients experiences clinically relevant improvements in pain, fatigue, and disability post-IMPT. Establishing a prediction model encompassing various outcome measures could enhance rehabilitation and personalized healthcare. Thus, the aim was to develop and validate a prediction model for IMPT success in patients with CMP. A prospective cohort study within routine care was performed, including patients with CMP undergoing a 10-week IMPT. Success across four outcome measures was determined: patients' recovery perspective, quality of life (physical and mental), and disability. Sixty-five demographic and candidate predictors (mainly patient reported outcome measures) were examined. Finally, 2309 patients participated, with IMPT success rates ranging from 30% to 57%. Four models incorporating 33 predictors were developed, with treatment control being the sole consistent predictor across all models. Additionally, predictors effects varied in direction in the models. All models demonstrated strong calibration, fair to good discrimination, and were internally validated (optimism-corrected AUC range 0.69–0.80). Our findings show that treatment success can be predicted using standardized patient-reported measures, exhibiting strong discriminatory power. However, predictors vary depending on the outcome, underscoring the importance of selecting the appropriate measure upfront. Clinically, these results suggest potential for patient-centered care and may contribute to the development of a scientifically sound decision tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
期刊最新文献
The overlooked epidemic: Fibromyalgia in the shadows of long COVID. Smoking-related bias of standardized mortality ratios in rheumatoid arthritis: A modeling study The pathogenesis, diagnostic utility and clinical relevance of cutaneous telangiectasia in systemic sclerosis Prediction models for treatment success after an interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment program Immune checkpoint inhibitors and rheumatoid arthritis: All roads lead to PD-1?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1