衡量利益相关者在全州初级保健心血管健康改善合作组织中的参与度。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Population Health Management Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1089/pop.2024.0175
Kimberly A Smith, Adam T Perzynski, Cori C Grant, Demetria Hubbard, Larry R Hearld, James E Bailey, Satya Surbhi, Umar Kabir, Andrea L Cherrington
{"title":"衡量利益相关者在全州初级保健心血管健康改善合作组织中的参与度。","authors":"Kimberly A Smith, Adam T Perzynski, Cori C Grant, Demetria Hubbard, Larry R Hearld, James E Bailey, Satya Surbhi, Umar Kabir, Andrea L Cherrington","doi":"10.1089/pop.2024.0175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a major national health challenge with significant disparities linked to socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, sex, and geography, prompting federal efforts to build statewide primary care quality improvement (QI) cooperatives to improve heart health. To be effective, cooperatives require high levels of member engagement and leaders need ways to assess engagement. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a novel Cooperative Member Survey to assess cooperative member engagement and assess the value of the cooperative to members across three statewide heart health QI cooperatives. The 14-item survey included fixed-response and open-ended questions and was developed through multiple iterative rounds across the three cooperatives to gain consensus on the wording of final items using a Delphi process. The survey then was administered to the key stakeholders in the three cooperatives. Findings from both the quantitative and qualitative items were analyzed and reported based on frequencies and emerging themes. The survey was then analyzed to determine factor structure and validity. Analysis revealed a two-factor structure which the research team identified as: (1) Cooperative Engagement, consisting of 11 items that measured how well the cooperative functioned overall, and (2) Cooperative Value, consisting of two items that assessed the perceived value of mutual learning and respect within the cooperative. This two-factor structure indicated that the Cooperative Member Survey successfully captured both the practical aspects of how the cooperative operates and the members' perceived benefits of their involvement. Successful QI cooperatives not only require efficient operations but also a sense of shared value among members. These findings suggest that cooperatives designed to improve public health outcomes may benefit from focusing not only on practical aspects of engagement but also on cultivating mutual respect and collective learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Stakeholder Engagement in Statewide Primary Care Cardiovascular Health Improvement Cooperatives.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly A Smith, Adam T Perzynski, Cori C Grant, Demetria Hubbard, Larry R Hearld, James E Bailey, Satya Surbhi, Umar Kabir, Andrea L Cherrington\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/pop.2024.0175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a major national health challenge with significant disparities linked to socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, sex, and geography, prompting federal efforts to build statewide primary care quality improvement (QI) cooperatives to improve heart health. To be effective, cooperatives require high levels of member engagement and leaders need ways to assess engagement. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a novel Cooperative Member Survey to assess cooperative member engagement and assess the value of the cooperative to members across three statewide heart health QI cooperatives. The 14-item survey included fixed-response and open-ended questions and was developed through multiple iterative rounds across the three cooperatives to gain consensus on the wording of final items using a Delphi process. The survey then was administered to the key stakeholders in the three cooperatives. Findings from both the quantitative and qualitative items were analyzed and reported based on frequencies and emerging themes. The survey was then analyzed to determine factor structure and validity. Analysis revealed a two-factor structure which the research team identified as: (1) Cooperative Engagement, consisting of 11 items that measured how well the cooperative functioned overall, and (2) Cooperative Value, consisting of two items that assessed the perceived value of mutual learning and respect within the cooperative. This two-factor structure indicated that the Cooperative Member Survey successfully captured both the practical aspects of how the cooperative operates and the members' perceived benefits of their involvement. Successful QI cooperatives not only require efficient operations but also a sense of shared value among members. These findings suggest that cooperatives designed to improve public health outcomes may benefit from focusing not only on practical aspects of engagement but also on cultivating mutual respect and collective learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Health Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2024.0175\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2024.0175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心血管疾病(CVD)仍然是全国健康面临的一大挑战,与社会经济地位、种族、民族、性别和地理位置等因素相关的显著差异,促使联邦政府努力在全州范围内建立初级医疗质量改进(QI)合作社,以改善心脏健康状况。合作社要想取得成效,需要成员的高度参与,而领导者则需要评估参与度的方法。本研究的目的是开发并验证一种新颖的合作社成员调查,以评估合作社成员的参与度,并评估三个全州范围内心脏健康 QI 合作社的合作社对成员的价值。该调查问卷共有 14 个项目,包括固定回答式问题和开放式问题,在三个合作社中经过多轮迭代开发,以通过德尔菲流程就最终项目的措辞达成共识。然后,对三个合作社的主要利益相关者进行了调查。根据频率和新出现的主题,对定量和定性项目的结果进行了分析和报告。然后对调查进行分析,以确定因子结构和有效性。分析表明,研究小组确定了双因素结构,即(1) 合作参与,由 11 个项目组成,衡量合作社的整体运作情况;(2) 合作价值,由两个项目组成,评估合作社内部相互学习和尊重的感知价值。这种双因素结构表明,合作社成员调查成功地捕捉到了合作社运作方式的实际方面以及成员对参与合作社所带来的益处的感知。成功的质量创新合作社不仅需要高效的运营,还需要成员之间的价值共享意识。这些研究结果表明,旨在改善公共卫生成果的合作社不仅要注重参与的实际方面,还要注重培养相互尊重和集体学习,这样才能从中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring Stakeholder Engagement in Statewide Primary Care Cardiovascular Health Improvement Cooperatives.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a major national health challenge with significant disparities linked to socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, sex, and geography, prompting federal efforts to build statewide primary care quality improvement (QI) cooperatives to improve heart health. To be effective, cooperatives require high levels of member engagement and leaders need ways to assess engagement. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a novel Cooperative Member Survey to assess cooperative member engagement and assess the value of the cooperative to members across three statewide heart health QI cooperatives. The 14-item survey included fixed-response and open-ended questions and was developed through multiple iterative rounds across the three cooperatives to gain consensus on the wording of final items using a Delphi process. The survey then was administered to the key stakeholders in the three cooperatives. Findings from both the quantitative and qualitative items were analyzed and reported based on frequencies and emerging themes. The survey was then analyzed to determine factor structure and validity. Analysis revealed a two-factor structure which the research team identified as: (1) Cooperative Engagement, consisting of 11 items that measured how well the cooperative functioned overall, and (2) Cooperative Value, consisting of two items that assessed the perceived value of mutual learning and respect within the cooperative. This two-factor structure indicated that the Cooperative Member Survey successfully captured both the practical aspects of how the cooperative operates and the members' perceived benefits of their involvement. Successful QI cooperatives not only require efficient operations but also a sense of shared value among members. These findings suggest that cooperatives designed to improve public health outcomes may benefit from focusing not only on practical aspects of engagement but also on cultivating mutual respect and collective learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Population Health Management
Population Health Management 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Management provides comprehensive, authoritative strategies for improving the systems and policies that affect health care quality, access, and outcomes, ultimately improving the health of an entire population. The Journal delivers essential research on a broad range of topics including the impact of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors on health care systems and practices. Population Health Management coverage includes: Clinical case reports and studies on managing major public health conditions Compliance programs Health economics Outcomes assessment Provider incentives Health care reform Resource management Return on investment (ROI) Health care quality Care coordination.
期刊最新文献
Telehealth as a Tool for Increasing Health Determinant Risk Assessment: An Analysis of the 2024 Physician Fee Schedule's New Health Equity Codes. Hospital Safety-Net Burden is Associated with Perioperative Outcomes in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multistate Retrospective Analysis, 2015-2020. Transitional Care for Older Adults: Demonstration of the Role of a Partnership Payvider. Estimating Cost Savings of Care Coordination for Older Adults: Evidence from the Iowa Return to Community Program. Developing a Strategy to Increase Lung Cancer Screening in Areas of Need.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1