Haiying Liu, Yue Zhang, Xin Li, Danhua Wang, Dongxue Huang, Xiaowei Zhou, Yuehao Shen
{"title":"[Summary of best evidence and evidence-based practice of exercise intervention in elderly patients with sarcopenia in intensive care unit].","authors":"Haiying Liu, Yue Zhang, Xin Li, Danhua Wang, Dongxue Huang, Xiaowei Zhou, Yuehao Shen","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240527-00463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize the best evidence for exercise intervention in elderly patients with sarcopenia in intensive care unit (ICU) through literature search, and provide a reference for clinical implementation of early exercise intervention in this population through evidence-based practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>(1) Summary of best evidence: relevant literature on exercise intervention for elderly patients with sarcopenia in ICU, including guideline, evidence summary, expert consensus, systematic review, and original study [quasi-experiment and randomized controlled trial (RCT)] from UpToDate Clinical Advisor, Ovid database, National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Cochrane Library, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed/Medline, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP, and Yimai Tong Guideline Network were systematically searched. The search period covered from the establishment of these databases up to August 24, 2023. The quality of the literature was evaluated by two researchers with methodological expertise in evidence-based medicine, and the evidences were extracted and summarized. (2) Evidence-based practice: the elderly patients with high risk of sarcopenia who had been hospitalized in the ICU for more than 7 days from January to April 2024 were enrolled as the research subjects, and they were divided into a control group and an intervention group using convenience sampling method. The control group received routine intensive care nursing. The intervention group implemented exercise intervention based on the actual situation of the patients, the baseline review was conducted before evidence application, and the effectiveness of evidence application at 7 days and 14 days was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) A total of 19 pieces of literature were included, including 4 guidelines, 1 summary of evidence, 4 expert consensuses, 4 systematic reviews, and 6 original studies (1 quasi-experiment, 5 RCT). After literature quality evaluation, all 19 articles were enrolled. Finally, 31 pieces of best evidence were extracted from eight aspects, including assessment and diagnosis, multidisciplinary cooperation, indication, preparation before intervention, intervention program, safety monitoring, post-intervention evaluation, and special task. (2) Finally, a total of 30 patients were enrolled in the intervention group, of which 17 completed 14 days of rehabilitation exercise, and 13 completed 7 days of rehabilitation exercise. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled in the control group, of which 17 completed 14 days of monitoring, and 10 completed 7 days of monitoring. Clinical evidence application results showed that the patients in the intervention group did not experience adverse events such as increased heart rate, extubation, or physical discomfort. The skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) in both groups was gradually decreased with the prolongation of intervention duration, but the 7-day SMI in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (kg/m<sup>2</sup>: 8.61±2.66 vs. 6.65±1.50, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By summarizing the best evidence and evidence-based practice of exercise intervention for elderly patients with sarcopenia in ICU, this study confirmed the feasibility due to safe and effective of implementing early exercise intervention for elderly sarcopenia patients in ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":24079,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","volume":"36 10","pages":"1095-1011"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240527-00463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过文献检索,总结对重症监护室(ICU)老年肌肉疏松症患者进行运动干预的最佳证据,为临床通过循证实践对该人群实施早期运动干预提供参考。方法:(1)总结最佳证据:从 UpToDate Clinical Advisor、Ovid 数据库中检索有关 ICU 中患有肌肉疏松症的老年患者运动干预的相关文献,包括指南、证据摘要、专家共识、系统综述和原始研究 [准实验和随机对照试验 (RCT)]、系统地检索了美国国家指南交换中心(NGC)、美国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、PubMed/Medline、SinoMed、CNKI、万方数据库、VIP 和一麦通指南网。检索期从这些数据库建立之日起至 2023 年 8 月 24 日。由两名具有循证医学方法学专业知识的研究人员对文献质量进行评估,并对证据进行提取和总结。(2)循证实践:以 2024 年 1 月至 4 月期间在重症监护室住院 7 天以上的肌少症高危老年患者为研究对象,采用方便抽样法将其分为对照组和干预组。对照组接受常规重症监护护理。结果:(1)共纳入文献19篇,其中指南4篇,证据摘要1篇,专家共识4篇,系统综述4篇,原创研究6篇(准实验1篇,RCT 5篇)。经过文献质量评估后,19 篇文章全部入选。最后,从评估与诊断、多学科合作、适应症、干预前准备、干预方案、安全监测、干预后评价、特殊任务等八个方面提取了 31 条最佳证据。(2)最后,共有 30 名患者被纳入干预组,其中 17 人完成了 14 天的康复锻炼,13 人完成了 7 天的康复锻炼。对照组共有 27 名患者,其中 17 人完成了 14 天的监测,10 人完成了 7 天的监测。临床证据应用结果显示,干预组患者未出现心率加快、拔管或身体不适等不良事件。随着干预时间的延长,两组患者的骨骼肌质量指数(SMI)均逐渐下降,但干预组的7天SMI明显高于对照组(kg/m2:8.61±2.66 vs. 6.65±1.50,P<0.01):本研究通过总结对 ICU 老年肌肉疏松症患者进行运动干预的最佳证据和循证实践,证实了对 ICU 老年肌肉疏松症患者实施早期运动干预的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Summary of best evidence and evidence-based practice of exercise intervention in elderly patients with sarcopenia in intensive care unit].

Objective: To summarize the best evidence for exercise intervention in elderly patients with sarcopenia in intensive care unit (ICU) through literature search, and provide a reference for clinical implementation of early exercise intervention in this population through evidence-based practice.

Methods: (1) Summary of best evidence: relevant literature on exercise intervention for elderly patients with sarcopenia in ICU, including guideline, evidence summary, expert consensus, systematic review, and original study [quasi-experiment and randomized controlled trial (RCT)] from UpToDate Clinical Advisor, Ovid database, National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Cochrane Library, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed/Medline, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP, and Yimai Tong Guideline Network were systematically searched. The search period covered from the establishment of these databases up to August 24, 2023. The quality of the literature was evaluated by two researchers with methodological expertise in evidence-based medicine, and the evidences were extracted and summarized. (2) Evidence-based practice: the elderly patients with high risk of sarcopenia who had been hospitalized in the ICU for more than 7 days from January to April 2024 were enrolled as the research subjects, and they were divided into a control group and an intervention group using convenience sampling method. The control group received routine intensive care nursing. The intervention group implemented exercise intervention based on the actual situation of the patients, the baseline review was conducted before evidence application, and the effectiveness of evidence application at 7 days and 14 days was evaluated.

Results: (1) A total of 19 pieces of literature were included, including 4 guidelines, 1 summary of evidence, 4 expert consensuses, 4 systematic reviews, and 6 original studies (1 quasi-experiment, 5 RCT). After literature quality evaluation, all 19 articles were enrolled. Finally, 31 pieces of best evidence were extracted from eight aspects, including assessment and diagnosis, multidisciplinary cooperation, indication, preparation before intervention, intervention program, safety monitoring, post-intervention evaluation, and special task. (2) Finally, a total of 30 patients were enrolled in the intervention group, of which 17 completed 14 days of rehabilitation exercise, and 13 completed 7 days of rehabilitation exercise. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled in the control group, of which 17 completed 14 days of monitoring, and 10 completed 7 days of monitoring. Clinical evidence application results showed that the patients in the intervention group did not experience adverse events such as increased heart rate, extubation, or physical discomfort. The skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) in both groups was gradually decreased with the prolongation of intervention duration, but the 7-day SMI in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (kg/m2: 8.61±2.66 vs. 6.65±1.50, P < 0.01).

Conclusions: By summarizing the best evidence and evidence-based practice of exercise intervention for elderly patients with sarcopenia in ICU, this study confirmed the feasibility due to safe and effective of implementing early exercise intervention for elderly sarcopenia patients in ICU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
[Analysis of risk factors for onset of acquired Serratia marcescens infection in neonatal intensive care unit]. [Bedside ultrasound monitoring of optic nerve sheath diameter is a predictive factor for 28-day coma, delirium and death in etiologically diverse critically ill patients]. [Prone position-cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults: a scoping review]. [Predictive value of neutrophil free fatty acid receptor 3 for secondary infection in patients with severe acute pancreatitis]. [Construction and application of physical restraint reduction scheme for adult patients after cardiac surgery based on eCASH concept].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1