Nidhi Sharma , Manu Goyal , Adarsh Kumar Srivastav , Asir John Samuel
{"title":"对评估儿童协调性的成果措施进行系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Nidhi Sharma , Manu Goyal , Adarsh Kumar Srivastav , Asir John Samuel","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Coordination can be tested through different outcomes, which provide a platform for clinical and research purposes. The psychometric properties of the outcomes aid clinicians/researchers in appropriately selecting the measure.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the coordination outcomes measures for children aged 4–17.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>A literature search was made using PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, Ovid-SP, and PEDro from inception to August 2021. Experimental studies involving children, written in English with coordination as one of the variables, were included. An adapted version of the COSMIN checklist was used for psychometric properties. Quality assessment of included articles was evaluated through the risk of bias, Level of Evidence, Grades, and PEDro.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>1082 articles were screened, of which 12 trials were included. Gross motor coordination has been observed as a part of the coordination tests. Meta-analysis of Korperkoordinationtests fur Kinder (KTK) showed high heterogeneity (<em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 93%) among intervention effects. 93% of outcome measures are reliable, but only 46% have criterion validity, while responsiveness is found in 73%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The KTK showed excellent methodological quality, while other outcome measures had limitations in their psychometric properties. Therefore, there is a need to refine and develop coordination scales with excellent psychometric properties that could be useful for children aged 4–17 years.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 171-186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcome measures to assess coordination among children\",\"authors\":\"Nidhi Sharma , Manu Goyal , Adarsh Kumar Srivastav , Asir John Samuel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Coordination can be tested through different outcomes, which provide a platform for clinical and research purposes. The psychometric properties of the outcomes aid clinicians/researchers in appropriately selecting the measure.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the coordination outcomes measures for children aged 4–17.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>A literature search was made using PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, Ovid-SP, and PEDro from inception to August 2021. Experimental studies involving children, written in English with coordination as one of the variables, were included. An adapted version of the COSMIN checklist was used for psychometric properties. Quality assessment of included articles was evaluated through the risk of bias, Level of Evidence, Grades, and PEDro.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>1082 articles were screened, of which 12 trials were included. Gross motor coordination has been observed as a part of the coordination tests. Meta-analysis of Korperkoordinationtests fur Kinder (KTK) showed high heterogeneity (<em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 93%) among intervention effects. 93% of outcome measures are reliable, but only 46% have criterion validity, while responsiveness is found in 73%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The KTK showed excellent methodological quality, while other outcome measures had limitations in their psychometric properties. Therefore, there is a need to refine and develop coordination scales with excellent psychometric properties that could be useful for children aged 4–17 years.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 171-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcome measures to assess coordination among children
Background
Coordination can be tested through different outcomes, which provide a platform for clinical and research purposes. The psychometric properties of the outcomes aid clinicians/researchers in appropriately selecting the measure.
Objective
To investigate the coordination outcomes measures for children aged 4–17.
Methodology
A literature search was made using PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, Ovid-SP, and PEDro from inception to August 2021. Experimental studies involving children, written in English with coordination as one of the variables, were included. An adapted version of the COSMIN checklist was used for psychometric properties. Quality assessment of included articles was evaluated through the risk of bias, Level of Evidence, Grades, and PEDro.
Result
1082 articles were screened, of which 12 trials were included. Gross motor coordination has been observed as a part of the coordination tests. Meta-analysis of Korperkoordinationtests fur Kinder (KTK) showed high heterogeneity (I2 = 93%) among intervention effects. 93% of outcome measures are reliable, but only 46% have criterion validity, while responsiveness is found in 73%.
Conclusion
The KTK showed excellent methodological quality, while other outcome measures had limitations in their psychometric properties. Therefore, there is a need to refine and develop coordination scales with excellent psychometric properties that could be useful for children aged 4–17 years.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
