提高燃料电池汽车的效率:探索采用间歇喷雾冷却的堆栈式散热器的动态冷却策略

IF 15 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Etransportation Pub Date : 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1016/j.etran.2024.100384
Rajendran Prabakaran, M. Mohamed Souby, Jie Liu, Sung Chul Kim
{"title":"提高燃料电池汽车的效率:探索采用间歇喷雾冷却的堆栈式散热器的动态冷却策略","authors":"Rajendran Prabakaran,&nbsp;M. Mohamed Souby,&nbsp;Jie Liu,&nbsp;Sung Chul Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.etran.2024.100384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advancements in stack cooling via air-cooled radiators for fuel cell (FC) electric vehicles have attracted significant attention. In this study, continuous spray cooling (CTSC) and intermittent spray cooling (IMSC) approaches for FC vehicles were developed at a lab-scale level. Additionally, the thermo-evaporation performance of various IMSC strategies, involving different spray intervals (0–120 s), continuous spray periods (10–60 s), and duty cycles (25–100 %), was investigated. Steady-state analysis revealed that, compared to conventional stack radiators, the CTSC approach using Nozzle#2 achieved superior thermal efficiency (η<sub>th</sub>) with an improvement of 36.6–83.8 %, and enhanced spray evaporation efficiency (η<sub>ev</sub>) by 18.2–23.9 %. In contrast, Nozzle#1 yielded only a 16.2–52.5 % increase in η<sub>th</sub> and an 11.4–18.6 % improvement in η<sub>ev</sub>. Compared to CTSC, IMSC extended the low-temperature operating range of the radiator even during the spray-off periods, leading to improved spray evaporation performance. However, excessive coolant exit temperature and heat rejection rate fluctuations were observed at higher spray periods with longer intervals (IMSC-60-60I and IMSC-40-40I) and lower duty cycles (&lt;50 %). On the other hand, the IMSC strategy with shorter intervals and spray periods, i.e., IMSC-30-20I, was identified as optimal, offering a 55.7 % improvement in η<sub>ev</sub> compared to CTSC, despite a 2.8 % reduction in η<sub>th</sub>. Overall, the optimal IMSC configuration exhibited a 69.4 % higher heat rejection capacity compared to conventional air-cooled stack radiators. Furthermore, variations in η<sub>th</sub> were validated using existing correlations, and new empirical correlations for both η<sub>th</sub> and air-side heat transfer coefficient were developed, with prediction accuracies of approximately 86 % and 85 %, respectively. Additionally, the radiator's heat transfer area could be reduced by up to 76.2 %, despite a 7.5 % increase in vehicle curb weight. In summary, this study highlights the potential of using IMSC strategies for stack radiators in FC vehicles. The findings provide valuable insights for designing and implementing IMSC-enhanced radiators in real-world applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36355,"journal":{"name":"Etransportation","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100384"},"PeriodicalIF":15.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving fuel cell vehicle efficiency: Exploring dynamic cooling strategies for stack radiators with intermittent spray cooling\",\"authors\":\"Rajendran Prabakaran,&nbsp;M. Mohamed Souby,&nbsp;Jie Liu,&nbsp;Sung Chul Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.etran.2024.100384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Advancements in stack cooling via air-cooled radiators for fuel cell (FC) electric vehicles have attracted significant attention. In this study, continuous spray cooling (CTSC) and intermittent spray cooling (IMSC) approaches for FC vehicles were developed at a lab-scale level. Additionally, the thermo-evaporation performance of various IMSC strategies, involving different spray intervals (0–120 s), continuous spray periods (10–60 s), and duty cycles (25–100 %), was investigated. Steady-state analysis revealed that, compared to conventional stack radiators, the CTSC approach using Nozzle#2 achieved superior thermal efficiency (η<sub>th</sub>) with an improvement of 36.6–83.8 %, and enhanced spray evaporation efficiency (η<sub>ev</sub>) by 18.2–23.9 %. In contrast, Nozzle#1 yielded only a 16.2–52.5 % increase in η<sub>th</sub> and an 11.4–18.6 % improvement in η<sub>ev</sub>. Compared to CTSC, IMSC extended the low-temperature operating range of the radiator even during the spray-off periods, leading to improved spray evaporation performance. However, excessive coolant exit temperature and heat rejection rate fluctuations were observed at higher spray periods with longer intervals (IMSC-60-60I and IMSC-40-40I) and lower duty cycles (&lt;50 %). On the other hand, the IMSC strategy with shorter intervals and spray periods, i.e., IMSC-30-20I, was identified as optimal, offering a 55.7 % improvement in η<sub>ev</sub> compared to CTSC, despite a 2.8 % reduction in η<sub>th</sub>. Overall, the optimal IMSC configuration exhibited a 69.4 % higher heat rejection capacity compared to conventional air-cooled stack radiators. Furthermore, variations in η<sub>th</sub> were validated using existing correlations, and new empirical correlations for both η<sub>th</sub> and air-side heat transfer coefficient were developed, with prediction accuracies of approximately 86 % and 85 %, respectively. Additionally, the radiator's heat transfer area could be reduced by up to 76.2 %, despite a 7.5 % increase in vehicle curb weight. In summary, this study highlights the potential of using IMSC strategies for stack radiators in FC vehicles. The findings provide valuable insights for designing and implementing IMSC-enhanced radiators in real-world applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Etransportation\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Etransportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590116824000742\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etransportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590116824000742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

燃料电池(FC)电动汽车通过风冷散热器进行堆栈冷却的技术进步引起了广泛关注。在这项研究中,在实验室规模的水平上开发了用于燃料电池汽车的连续喷雾冷却(CTSC)和间歇喷雾冷却(IMSC)方法。此外,还研究了各种 IMSC 策略的热蒸发性能,包括不同的喷淋间隔(0-120 秒)、连续喷淋时间(10-60 秒)和占空比(25%-100%)。稳态分析表明,与传统的堆栈式散热器相比,使用喷嘴 #2 的 CTSC 方法实现了更高的热效率(ηth),提高了 36.6-83.8 %,喷雾蒸发效率(ηev)提高了 18.2-23.9 %。相比之下,喷嘴 #1 的 ηth 仅提高了 16.2-52.5%,ηev 提高了 11.4-18.6%。与 CTSC 相比,IMSC 甚至在喷雾关闭期间也能延长散热器的低温工作范围,从而改善了喷雾蒸发性能。然而,在较长的喷淋周期(IMSC-60-60I 和 IMSC-40-40I)和较低的占空比(<50 %)下,冷却剂出口温度和排热速率波动过大。另一方面,间隔和喷淋时间较短的 IMSC 策略(即 IMSC-30-20I)被确定为最佳策略,与 CTSC 相比,ηev 提高了 55.7%,尽管 ηth 降低了 2.8%。总体而言,最佳 IMSC 配置的排热能力比传统的风冷叠片散热器高出 69.4%。此外,ηth 的变化已通过现有的相关系数进行了验证,并针对 ηth 和空气侧传热系数开发了新的经验相关系数,预测精度分别达到约 86% 和 85%。此外,尽管车辆整备质量增加了 7.5%,但散热器的传热面积最多可减少 76.2%。总之,本研究强调了将 IMSC 策略用于 FC 汽车叠层散热器的潜力。研究结果为在实际应用中设计和实施 IMSC 增强型散热器提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving fuel cell vehicle efficiency: Exploring dynamic cooling strategies for stack radiators with intermittent spray cooling
Advancements in stack cooling via air-cooled radiators for fuel cell (FC) electric vehicles have attracted significant attention. In this study, continuous spray cooling (CTSC) and intermittent spray cooling (IMSC) approaches for FC vehicles were developed at a lab-scale level. Additionally, the thermo-evaporation performance of various IMSC strategies, involving different spray intervals (0–120 s), continuous spray periods (10–60 s), and duty cycles (25–100 %), was investigated. Steady-state analysis revealed that, compared to conventional stack radiators, the CTSC approach using Nozzle#2 achieved superior thermal efficiency (ηth) with an improvement of 36.6–83.8 %, and enhanced spray evaporation efficiency (ηev) by 18.2–23.9 %. In contrast, Nozzle#1 yielded only a 16.2–52.5 % increase in ηth and an 11.4–18.6 % improvement in ηev. Compared to CTSC, IMSC extended the low-temperature operating range of the radiator even during the spray-off periods, leading to improved spray evaporation performance. However, excessive coolant exit temperature and heat rejection rate fluctuations were observed at higher spray periods with longer intervals (IMSC-60-60I and IMSC-40-40I) and lower duty cycles (<50 %). On the other hand, the IMSC strategy with shorter intervals and spray periods, i.e., IMSC-30-20I, was identified as optimal, offering a 55.7 % improvement in ηev compared to CTSC, despite a 2.8 % reduction in ηth. Overall, the optimal IMSC configuration exhibited a 69.4 % higher heat rejection capacity compared to conventional air-cooled stack radiators. Furthermore, variations in ηth were validated using existing correlations, and new empirical correlations for both ηth and air-side heat transfer coefficient were developed, with prediction accuracies of approximately 86 % and 85 %, respectively. Additionally, the radiator's heat transfer area could be reduced by up to 76.2 %, despite a 7.5 % increase in vehicle curb weight. In summary, this study highlights the potential of using IMSC strategies for stack radiators in FC vehicles. The findings provide valuable insights for designing and implementing IMSC-enhanced radiators in real-world applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Etransportation
Etransportation Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
12.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: eTransportation is a scholarly journal that aims to advance knowledge in the field of electric transportation. It focuses on all modes of transportation that utilize electricity as their primary source of energy, including electric vehicles, trains, ships, and aircraft. The journal covers all stages of research, development, and testing of new technologies, systems, and devices related to electrical transportation. The journal welcomes the use of simulation and analysis tools at the system, transport, or device level. Its primary emphasis is on the study of the electrical and electronic aspects of transportation systems. However, it also considers research on mechanical parts or subsystems of vehicles if there is a clear interaction with electrical or electronic equipment. Please note that this journal excludes other aspects such as sociological, political, regulatory, or environmental factors from its scope.
期刊最新文献
Improving fuel cell vehicle efficiency: Exploring dynamic cooling strategies for stack radiators with intermittent spray cooling Resource-efficient artificial intelligence for battery capacity estimation using convolutional FlashAttention fusion networks Recent advances and perspectives in enhancing thermal state of lithium-ion batteries with phase change materials: Internal and external heat transfer enhancement factors Simulation of single-layer internal short circuit in anode-free batteries Comprehensive energy footprint of electrified fleets: School bus fleet case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1