Rajendran Prabakaran, M. Mohamed Souby, Jie Liu, Sung Chul Kim
{"title":"提高燃料电池汽车的效率:探索采用间歇喷雾冷却的堆栈式散热器的动态冷却策略","authors":"Rajendran Prabakaran, M. Mohamed Souby, Jie Liu, Sung Chul Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.etran.2024.100384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advancements in stack cooling via air-cooled radiators for fuel cell (FC) electric vehicles have attracted significant attention. In this study, continuous spray cooling (CTSC) and intermittent spray cooling (IMSC) approaches for FC vehicles were developed at a lab-scale level. Additionally, the thermo-evaporation performance of various IMSC strategies, involving different spray intervals (0–120 s), continuous spray periods (10–60 s), and duty cycles (25–100 %), was investigated. Steady-state analysis revealed that, compared to conventional stack radiators, the CTSC approach using Nozzle#2 achieved superior thermal efficiency (η<sub>th</sub>) with an improvement of 36.6–83.8 %, and enhanced spray evaporation efficiency (η<sub>ev</sub>) by 18.2–23.9 %. In contrast, Nozzle#1 yielded only a 16.2–52.5 % increase in η<sub>th</sub> and an 11.4–18.6 % improvement in η<sub>ev</sub>. Compared to CTSC, IMSC extended the low-temperature operating range of the radiator even during the spray-off periods, leading to improved spray evaporation performance. However, excessive coolant exit temperature and heat rejection rate fluctuations were observed at higher spray periods with longer intervals (IMSC-60-60I and IMSC-40-40I) and lower duty cycles (<50 %). On the other hand, the IMSC strategy with shorter intervals and spray periods, i.e., IMSC-30-20I, was identified as optimal, offering a 55.7 % improvement in η<sub>ev</sub> compared to CTSC, despite a 2.8 % reduction in η<sub>th</sub>. Overall, the optimal IMSC configuration exhibited a 69.4 % higher heat rejection capacity compared to conventional air-cooled stack radiators. Furthermore, variations in η<sub>th</sub> were validated using existing correlations, and new empirical correlations for both η<sub>th</sub> and air-side heat transfer coefficient were developed, with prediction accuracies of approximately 86 % and 85 %, respectively. Additionally, the radiator's heat transfer area could be reduced by up to 76.2 %, despite a 7.5 % increase in vehicle curb weight. In summary, this study highlights the potential of using IMSC strategies for stack radiators in FC vehicles. The findings provide valuable insights for designing and implementing IMSC-enhanced radiators in real-world applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36355,"journal":{"name":"Etransportation","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100384"},"PeriodicalIF":15.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving fuel cell vehicle efficiency: Exploring dynamic cooling strategies for stack radiators with intermittent spray cooling\",\"authors\":\"Rajendran Prabakaran, M. Mohamed Souby, Jie Liu, Sung Chul Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.etran.2024.100384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Advancements in stack cooling via air-cooled radiators for fuel cell (FC) electric vehicles have attracted significant attention. In this study, continuous spray cooling (CTSC) and intermittent spray cooling (IMSC) approaches for FC vehicles were developed at a lab-scale level. Additionally, the thermo-evaporation performance of various IMSC strategies, involving different spray intervals (0–120 s), continuous spray periods (10–60 s), and duty cycles (25–100 %), was investigated. Steady-state analysis revealed that, compared to conventional stack radiators, the CTSC approach using Nozzle#2 achieved superior thermal efficiency (η<sub>th</sub>) with an improvement of 36.6–83.8 %, and enhanced spray evaporation efficiency (η<sub>ev</sub>) by 18.2–23.9 %. In contrast, Nozzle#1 yielded only a 16.2–52.5 % increase in η<sub>th</sub> and an 11.4–18.6 % improvement in η<sub>ev</sub>. Compared to CTSC, IMSC extended the low-temperature operating range of the radiator even during the spray-off periods, leading to improved spray evaporation performance. However, excessive coolant exit temperature and heat rejection rate fluctuations were observed at higher spray periods with longer intervals (IMSC-60-60I and IMSC-40-40I) and lower duty cycles (<50 %). On the other hand, the IMSC strategy with shorter intervals and spray periods, i.e., IMSC-30-20I, was identified as optimal, offering a 55.7 % improvement in η<sub>ev</sub> compared to CTSC, despite a 2.8 % reduction in η<sub>th</sub>. Overall, the optimal IMSC configuration exhibited a 69.4 % higher heat rejection capacity compared to conventional air-cooled stack radiators. Furthermore, variations in η<sub>th</sub> were validated using existing correlations, and new empirical correlations for both η<sub>th</sub> and air-side heat transfer coefficient were developed, with prediction accuracies of approximately 86 % and 85 %, respectively. Additionally, the radiator's heat transfer area could be reduced by up to 76.2 %, despite a 7.5 % increase in vehicle curb weight. In summary, this study highlights the potential of using IMSC strategies for stack radiators in FC vehicles. The findings provide valuable insights for designing and implementing IMSC-enhanced radiators in real-world applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Etransportation\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Etransportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590116824000742\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etransportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590116824000742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving fuel cell vehicle efficiency: Exploring dynamic cooling strategies for stack radiators with intermittent spray cooling
Advancements in stack cooling via air-cooled radiators for fuel cell (FC) electric vehicles have attracted significant attention. In this study, continuous spray cooling (CTSC) and intermittent spray cooling (IMSC) approaches for FC vehicles were developed at a lab-scale level. Additionally, the thermo-evaporation performance of various IMSC strategies, involving different spray intervals (0–120 s), continuous spray periods (10–60 s), and duty cycles (25–100 %), was investigated. Steady-state analysis revealed that, compared to conventional stack radiators, the CTSC approach using Nozzle#2 achieved superior thermal efficiency (ηth) with an improvement of 36.6–83.8 %, and enhanced spray evaporation efficiency (ηev) by 18.2–23.9 %. In contrast, Nozzle#1 yielded only a 16.2–52.5 % increase in ηth and an 11.4–18.6 % improvement in ηev. Compared to CTSC, IMSC extended the low-temperature operating range of the radiator even during the spray-off periods, leading to improved spray evaporation performance. However, excessive coolant exit temperature and heat rejection rate fluctuations were observed at higher spray periods with longer intervals (IMSC-60-60I and IMSC-40-40I) and lower duty cycles (<50 %). On the other hand, the IMSC strategy with shorter intervals and spray periods, i.e., IMSC-30-20I, was identified as optimal, offering a 55.7 % improvement in ηev compared to CTSC, despite a 2.8 % reduction in ηth. Overall, the optimal IMSC configuration exhibited a 69.4 % higher heat rejection capacity compared to conventional air-cooled stack radiators. Furthermore, variations in ηth were validated using existing correlations, and new empirical correlations for both ηth and air-side heat transfer coefficient were developed, with prediction accuracies of approximately 86 % and 85 %, respectively. Additionally, the radiator's heat transfer area could be reduced by up to 76.2 %, despite a 7.5 % increase in vehicle curb weight. In summary, this study highlights the potential of using IMSC strategies for stack radiators in FC vehicles. The findings provide valuable insights for designing and implementing IMSC-enhanced radiators in real-world applications.
期刊介绍:
eTransportation is a scholarly journal that aims to advance knowledge in the field of electric transportation. It focuses on all modes of transportation that utilize electricity as their primary source of energy, including electric vehicles, trains, ships, and aircraft. The journal covers all stages of research, development, and testing of new technologies, systems, and devices related to electrical transportation.
The journal welcomes the use of simulation and analysis tools at the system, transport, or device level. Its primary emphasis is on the study of the electrical and electronic aspects of transportation systems. However, it also considers research on mechanical parts or subsystems of vehicles if there is a clear interaction with electrical or electronic equipment.
Please note that this journal excludes other aspects such as sociological, political, regulatory, or environmental factors from its scope.