Negar Rahimi, Alireza Kamankesh, Ioannis G Amiridis, Sajjad Daneshgar, Chrysostomos Sahinis, Vassilia Hatzitaki, Roger M Enoka
{"title":"利用基于机器学习的分类算法区分不同的站姿。","authors":"Negar Rahimi, Alireza Kamankesh, Ioannis G Amiridis, Sajjad Daneshgar, Chrysostomos Sahinis, Vassilia Hatzitaki, Roger M Enoka","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06959-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of our study was to evaluate the accuracy with which classification algorithms could distinguish among standing postures based on center-of-pressure (CoP) trajectories. We performed a secondary analysis of published data from three studies: Study A) assessment of balance control on firm or foam surfaces with eyes-open or closed, Study B) quantification of postural sway in forward-backward and side-to-side directions during four standing-balance tasks that differed in difficulty, and Study C) an evaluation of the impact of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on balance control in older adults. Three classification algorithms (decision tree, random forest, and k-nearest neighbor) were used to classify standing postures based on the extracted features from CoP trajectories in both the time and time-frequency domains. Such classifications enable the identification of differences and similarities in control strategy. Our results, especially those involving time-frequency features, demonstrated that distinct CoP trajectories could be identified from the extracted features in all conditions and postures in each study. Although the overall classification accuracy was similar using time-frequency features (~ 86%) for the three studies, there were substantial differences in accuracy across conditions and postures in Studies A and B but not in Study C. Nonetheless, the models were far superior to the published results with conventional metrics in distinguishing between the conditions and postures. Moreover, a Shapley Additive exPlanation analysis was able to identify the most important features that contributed to the classification performance of the models.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinguishing among standing postures with machine learning-based classification algorithms.\",\"authors\":\"Negar Rahimi, Alireza Kamankesh, Ioannis G Amiridis, Sajjad Daneshgar, Chrysostomos Sahinis, Vassilia Hatzitaki, Roger M Enoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00221-024-06959-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of our study was to evaluate the accuracy with which classification algorithms could distinguish among standing postures based on center-of-pressure (CoP) trajectories. We performed a secondary analysis of published data from three studies: Study A) assessment of balance control on firm or foam surfaces with eyes-open or closed, Study B) quantification of postural sway in forward-backward and side-to-side directions during four standing-balance tasks that differed in difficulty, and Study C) an evaluation of the impact of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on balance control in older adults. Three classification algorithms (decision tree, random forest, and k-nearest neighbor) were used to classify standing postures based on the extracted features from CoP trajectories in both the time and time-frequency domains. Such classifications enable the identification of differences and similarities in control strategy. Our results, especially those involving time-frequency features, demonstrated that distinct CoP trajectories could be identified from the extracted features in all conditions and postures in each study. Although the overall classification accuracy was similar using time-frequency features (~ 86%) for the three studies, there were substantial differences in accuracy across conditions and postures in Studies A and B but not in Study C. Nonetheless, the models were far superior to the published results with conventional metrics in distinguishing between the conditions and postures. Moreover, a Shapley Additive exPlanation analysis was able to identify the most important features that contributed to the classification performance of the models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"243 1\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06959-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06959-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们的研究旨在评估分类算法根据压力中心(CoP)轨迹区分站立姿势的准确性。我们对已发表的三项研究数据进行了二次分析:研究 A)评估睁眼或闭眼时在坚硬或泡沫表面上的平衡控制能力;研究 B)量化四种难度不同的站立平衡任务中前后和左右方向的姿势摇摆;研究 C)评估两种经皮神经电刺激模式对老年人平衡控制能力的影响。根据从 CoP 轨迹中提取的时域和时频域特征,使用三种分类算法(决策树、随机森林和 k 最近邻)对站立姿势进行分类。这种分类能够识别控制策略的异同。我们的研究结果,尤其是涉及时频特征的研究结果表明,在每项研究的所有条件和姿势中,都能从提取的特征中识别出不同的CoP轨迹。尽管在三项研究中,使用时间频率特性的总体分类准确率相似(约为 86%),但在研究 A 和研究 B 中,不同条件和姿势下的准确率存在很大差异,而在研究 C 中则没有。此外,Shapley Additive exPlanation 分析能够确定对模型分类性能有贡献的最重要特征。
Distinguishing among standing postures with machine learning-based classification algorithms.
The purpose of our study was to evaluate the accuracy with which classification algorithms could distinguish among standing postures based on center-of-pressure (CoP) trajectories. We performed a secondary analysis of published data from three studies: Study A) assessment of balance control on firm or foam surfaces with eyes-open or closed, Study B) quantification of postural sway in forward-backward and side-to-side directions during four standing-balance tasks that differed in difficulty, and Study C) an evaluation of the impact of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on balance control in older adults. Three classification algorithms (decision tree, random forest, and k-nearest neighbor) were used to classify standing postures based on the extracted features from CoP trajectories in both the time and time-frequency domains. Such classifications enable the identification of differences and similarities in control strategy. Our results, especially those involving time-frequency features, demonstrated that distinct CoP trajectories could be identified from the extracted features in all conditions and postures in each study. Although the overall classification accuracy was similar using time-frequency features (~ 86%) for the three studies, there were substantial differences in accuracy across conditions and postures in Studies A and B but not in Study C. Nonetheless, the models were far superior to the published results with conventional metrics in distinguishing between the conditions and postures. Moreover, a Shapley Additive exPlanation analysis was able to identify the most important features that contributed to the classification performance of the models.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.