Comparative analysis of Voxel-based morphometry using T1 and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to explore the relationship between brain structure and cognitive abilities.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1007/s00221-025-07000-3
Maziar Jalalvandi, Seyed Amir Hossein Batouli
{"title":"Comparative analysis of Voxel-based morphometry using T1 and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to explore the relationship between brain structure and cognitive abilities.","authors":"Maziar Jalalvandi, Seyed Amir Hossein Batouli","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07000-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) of T1-weighted (T1-w) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is primarily used to study the association of brain structure with cognitive functions. However, in theory, T2-weighted (T2-w) MRI could also be used in VBM studies because of its sensitivity to pathology and tissue changes. We aimed to compare the T1-w and T2-w images to study brain structures in association with cognitive abilities. VBM analysis was applied to T1-w and T2-w MRI data of 120 healthy participants aged 20 to 40. The MRI data was collected using a 3T machine, and it was analyzed with CAT12 to extract maps of Gray matter(GM). We used six cognitive tasks to assess cognitive abilities, including the balloon analog risk task (BART), block design, forward and backward digit span (FDST and BDST), and trail-making tasks A and B. Compared to T2-w, T1-w data showed more brain voxels in the BART, block design, FDST, TMT-A, and TMT-B tasks. However, T2-w imaging identified a greater number of voxels in the BDST. T1-w images identified more correlated brain regions with cognitive scores in the FDST, TMT-A, and B tasks than T2-w. In BART and Block design tasks, both methods revealed the same number of correlated regions, and T2-w just showed more regions than T1-w in the BDST. Findings revealed distinct patterns of sensitivity between T1-w and T2-w imaging in detecting brain regions associated with cognition. The two approaches demonstrated different strengths in identifying areas correlated with cognitive abilities. This study provides valuable guidance for selecting appropriate methods for identifying the optimal approach for detecting brain regions that exhibit the strongest correlations with cognitive abilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 2","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07000-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) of T1-weighted (T1-w) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is primarily used to study the association of brain structure with cognitive functions. However, in theory, T2-weighted (T2-w) MRI could also be used in VBM studies because of its sensitivity to pathology and tissue changes. We aimed to compare the T1-w and T2-w images to study brain structures in association with cognitive abilities. VBM analysis was applied to T1-w and T2-w MRI data of 120 healthy participants aged 20 to 40. The MRI data was collected using a 3T machine, and it was analyzed with CAT12 to extract maps of Gray matter(GM). We used six cognitive tasks to assess cognitive abilities, including the balloon analog risk task (BART), block design, forward and backward digit span (FDST and BDST), and trail-making tasks A and B. Compared to T2-w, T1-w data showed more brain voxels in the BART, block design, FDST, TMT-A, and TMT-B tasks. However, T2-w imaging identified a greater number of voxels in the BDST. T1-w images identified more correlated brain regions with cognitive scores in the FDST, TMT-A, and B tasks than T2-w. In BART and Block design tasks, both methods revealed the same number of correlated regions, and T2-w just showed more regions than T1-w in the BDST. Findings revealed distinct patterns of sensitivity between T1-w and T2-w imaging in detecting brain regions associated with cognition. The two approaches demonstrated different strengths in identifying areas correlated with cognitive abilities. This study provides valuable guidance for selecting appropriate methods for identifying the optimal approach for detecting brain regions that exhibit the strongest correlations with cognitive abilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于体素形态学的T1和t2加权磁共振成像对比分析,探讨脑结构与认知能力的关系。
基于体素的形态测量(VBM)的t1加权磁共振成像(MRI)主要用于研究大脑结构与认知功能的关联。然而,理论上,由于T2-w MRI对病理和组织变化的敏感性,也可用于VBM研究。我们的目的是通过比较T1-w和T2-w图像来研究与认知能力相关的大脑结构。对120例20 ~ 40岁健康受试者的T1-w和T2-w MRI数据进行VBM分析。使用3T机收集MRI数据,并使用CAT12进行分析以提取灰质(GM)图。我们使用6个认知任务来评估认知能力,包括气球模拟风险任务(BART)、块设计、前向和后向数字跨度(FDST和BDST)以及造径任务A和b。与T2-w相比,T1-w的数据显示BART、块设计、FDST、TMT-A和TMT-B任务的脑素量更多。然而,T2-w成像在BDST中识别出更多的体素。与T2-w相比,T1-w图像在FDST、TMT-A和B任务中识别出更多与认知得分相关的大脑区域。在BART和Block设计任务中,两种方法显示的相关区域数量相同,T2-w在BDST中显示的区域数量多于T1-w。研究结果显示,在检测与认知相关的大脑区域时,T1-w和T2-w成像的灵敏度模式不同。这两种方法在识别与认知能力相关的区域方面表现出不同的优势。这项研究为选择合适的方法来确定检测与认知能力表现出最强相关性的大脑区域的最佳方法提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting motor unit recruitment to TMS in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: cortical inhibition is retained during voluntary contractions. Comparative analysis of Voxel-based morphometry using T1 and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to explore the relationship between brain structure and cognitive abilities. Error compensation in a redundant system during 'failure' of individual motor elements. Reading words versus seeing font or handwriting style: a study of hemifield processing. Integrating vestibular and visual cues for verticality perception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1