Revisiting motor unit recruitment to TMS in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: cortical inhibition is retained during voluntary contractions.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06961-1
Blair Calancie, Natalia Alexeeva
{"title":"Revisiting motor unit recruitment to TMS in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: cortical inhibition is retained during voluntary contractions.","authors":"Blair Calancie, Natalia Alexeeva","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06961-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used for many years to study the pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Based on single- or dual-pulse TMS and EMG and/or single motor unit (MU) recordings, many groups have described a loss of central inhibition as an early marker of ALS dysfunction, reflecting a state of cortical 'hyperexcitability'. This conclusion is not without its detractors, however, leading us to reexamine this issue using 4-pulse TMS, shown previously to be more effective for testing central motor pathway functional integrity. A total of 221 motor units were tested in 13 subjects (6 controls; 7 with ALS) across a total of 798 unique TMS conditions. MUs were studied from hand muscles (usually first dorsal interosseus) and from tibialis anterior (TA). Subjects were required to recruit a MU to fire rhythmically, during which time 4-pulse trains of TMS were delivered. A given motor unit's recruitment was examined for different stimulus intensities and interpulse intervals (IPI). All motor units from control subjects showed short latency excitation to TMS, and short latency inhibition for TMS pulses of slightly weaker intensity (i.e. the threshold for inhibition was lower than that for excitation). The same was largely true for MUs studied in subjects with ALS, with the primary difference between control and ALS subjects being the need for stronger stimulus intensities to effect recruitment in subjects with ALS. We saw no evidence for a loss or reduction of inhibition of central motor output in persons with ALS, at least when tested during voluntary contractions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 2","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06961-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used for many years to study the pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Based on single- or dual-pulse TMS and EMG and/or single motor unit (MU) recordings, many groups have described a loss of central inhibition as an early marker of ALS dysfunction, reflecting a state of cortical 'hyperexcitability'. This conclusion is not without its detractors, however, leading us to reexamine this issue using 4-pulse TMS, shown previously to be more effective for testing central motor pathway functional integrity. A total of 221 motor units were tested in 13 subjects (6 controls; 7 with ALS) across a total of 798 unique TMS conditions. MUs were studied from hand muscles (usually first dorsal interosseus) and from tibialis anterior (TA). Subjects were required to recruit a MU to fire rhythmically, during which time 4-pulse trains of TMS were delivered. A given motor unit's recruitment was examined for different stimulus intensities and interpulse intervals (IPI). All motor units from control subjects showed short latency excitation to TMS, and short latency inhibition for TMS pulses of slightly weaker intensity (i.e. the threshold for inhibition was lower than that for excitation). The same was largely true for MUs studied in subjects with ALS, with the primary difference between control and ALS subjects being the need for stronger stimulus intensities to effect recruitment in subjects with ALS. We saw no evidence for a loss or reduction of inhibition of central motor output in persons with ALS, at least when tested during voluntary contractions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者经颅磁刺激中运动单元的重新招募:在自愿收缩期间皮质抑制保留。
经颅磁刺激(TMS)用于肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)的病理生理研究已有多年历史。基于单脉冲或双脉冲TMS和EMG和/或单运动单元(MU)记录,许多研究小组将中枢抑制丧失描述为ALS功能障碍的早期标志,反映了皮层“高兴奋性”状态。然而,这一结论并非没有批评者,这促使我们使用4脉冲经颅磁刺激重新审视这一问题,此前的研究表明,4脉冲经颅磁刺激在测试中枢运动通路功能完整性方面更有效。13名受试者共221个运动单元(6名对照;总共798种独特的经颅磁刺激条件。从手部肌肉(通常是第一背骨间肌)和胫骨前肌(TA)研究MUs。受试者被要求招募一个MU有节奏地放电,在此期间提供4脉冲TMS。在不同的刺激强度和脉冲间隔(IPI)下,对给定的运动单元的招募进行了检查。对照组所有运动单元对经颅磁刺激均表现为短潜伏期兴奋,对强度稍弱的经颅磁刺激脉冲表现为短潜伏期抑制(即抑制阈值低于兴奋阈值)。在ALS患者身上进行的MUs研究基本上也是如此,对照组和ALS患者之间的主要区别是需要更强的刺激强度来影响ALS患者的招募。我们没有看到ALS患者中枢运动输出抑制丧失或减少的证据,至少在自愿收缩期间进行测试时是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
Association of corpus callosum and corticospinal tract microstructure with bimanual coordination in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Customizing galvanic vestibular stimulation amplitude: an objective technique using sway indices to account for individual sensitivity. Acute cardiovascular exercise diminishes the consolidation of a complex whole-body task in young adults. Astrocyte-microglia IL-3-IL-3Rα signaling drives JAK2/STAT5-dependent neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration after status epilepticus. Working memory load and search efficiency in conventional monitor-based 2D versus 3D virtual settings: analysis of response times and parietal induced alpha activity in a modified Sternberg task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1