对用于大麻花序中农药残留气相色谱-质谱分析的净化程序进行严格评估。

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Journal of separation science Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1002/jssc.70033
Petr Mraz, Lucie Drabova, Michal Stupak, Dana Schusterova, Vladimir Kocourek, Jana Hajslova
{"title":"对用于大麻花序中农药残留气相色谱-质谱分析的净化程序进行严格评估。","authors":"Petr Mraz,&nbsp;Lucie Drabova,&nbsp;Michal Stupak,&nbsp;Dana Schusterova,&nbsp;Vladimir Kocourek,&nbsp;Jana Hajslova","doi":"10.1002/jssc.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Accurate analysis of pesticide residues in such a complex matrix as cannabis is a challenging task. The aim of this study was to find an optimal way of removing abundant matrix co-extracts from Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe extract prior to its analysis by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). Out of the seven procedures tested, clean-up with Supel QuE Verde sorbent provided the most satisfactory performance characteristics for 277 targeted pesticides, which is the highest number of these analytes ever investigated within a GC-MS-based study focused on cannabis. The criteria set in the SANTE/11312/2021 V2 document were considered to assess the results obtained within the method validation. Recoveries in the range of 70%–120% with repeatability ≤20% were obtained for 219 and 114 pesticides at spiking levels of 0.1 and 0.01 mg/kg, respectively. For a deeper insight into the function of tested sorbents and to understand the effects of interfering matrix co-extracts, the two-dimensional GC coupled with the time-of-flight MS method was employed for the analysis of all purified extracts. Co-eluting major phytocannabinoids and free fatty acids were shown to be responsible for high “chemical noise”, increasing limits of quantification of pesticides at respective retention times. Since cannabis chemotypes fairly differ in phytocannabinoid content, the matrix effects, thus performance characteristics, may vary. Under such conditions, validation is recommended for different cannabis chemotypes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of separation science","volume":"47 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Assessment of Clean-up Procedures Used for Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Cannabis Inflorescence\",\"authors\":\"Petr Mraz,&nbsp;Lucie Drabova,&nbsp;Michal Stupak,&nbsp;Dana Schusterova,&nbsp;Vladimir Kocourek,&nbsp;Jana Hajslova\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jssc.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Accurate analysis of pesticide residues in such a complex matrix as cannabis is a challenging task. The aim of this study was to find an optimal way of removing abundant matrix co-extracts from Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe extract prior to its analysis by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). Out of the seven procedures tested, clean-up with Supel QuE Verde sorbent provided the most satisfactory performance characteristics for 277 targeted pesticides, which is the highest number of these analytes ever investigated within a GC-MS-based study focused on cannabis. The criteria set in the SANTE/11312/2021 V2 document were considered to assess the results obtained within the method validation. Recoveries in the range of 70%–120% with repeatability ≤20% were obtained for 219 and 114 pesticides at spiking levels of 0.1 and 0.01 mg/kg, respectively. For a deeper insight into the function of tested sorbents and to understand the effects of interfering matrix co-extracts, the two-dimensional GC coupled with the time-of-flight MS method was employed for the analysis of all purified extracts. Co-eluting major phytocannabinoids and free fatty acids were shown to be responsible for high “chemical noise”, increasing limits of quantification of pesticides at respective retention times. Since cannabis chemotypes fairly differ in phytocannabinoid content, the matrix effects, thus performance characteristics, may vary. Under such conditions, validation is recommended for different cannabis chemotypes.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of separation science\",\"volume\":\"47 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of separation science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.70033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of separation science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jssc.70033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确分析大麻这种复杂基质中的农药残留是一项具有挑战性的任务。本研究的目的是找到一种最佳方法,在使用气相色谱-串联质谱法(GC-MS/MS)分析之前,去除快速、简便、廉价、有效、坚固和安全提取物中的大量基质共萃取物。在测试的七种程序中,使用 Supel QuE Verde 吸附剂进行的净化为 277 种目标农药提供了最令人满意的性能特征,这是在以大麻为重点的气相色谱-质谱法研究中对这些分析物进行调查的最高数量。SANTE/11312/2021 V2 文件中规定的标准被用来评估方法验证中获得的结果。在 0.1 和 0.01 毫克/千克的添加水平下,分别有 219 和 114 种农药的回收率在 70%-120% 之间,重复性≤20%。为了更深入地了解测试吸附剂的功能和干扰基质共萃取物的影响,采用了二维气相色谱-飞行时间质谱法对所有纯化提取物进行分析。结果表明,共萃取的主要植物大麻素和游离脂肪酸造成了较高的 "化学噪音",增加了农药在各自保留时间的定量限。由于大麻化学类型在植物大麻素含量方面存在相当大的差异,基质效应可能会不同,因此性能特征也会不同。在这种情况下,建议对不同的大麻化学类型进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical Assessment of Clean-up Procedures Used for Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Cannabis Inflorescence

Accurate analysis of pesticide residues in such a complex matrix as cannabis is a challenging task. The aim of this study was to find an optimal way of removing abundant matrix co-extracts from Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe extract prior to its analysis by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). Out of the seven procedures tested, clean-up with Supel QuE Verde sorbent provided the most satisfactory performance characteristics for 277 targeted pesticides, which is the highest number of these analytes ever investigated within a GC-MS-based study focused on cannabis. The criteria set in the SANTE/11312/2021 V2 document were considered to assess the results obtained within the method validation. Recoveries in the range of 70%–120% with repeatability ≤20% were obtained for 219 and 114 pesticides at spiking levels of 0.1 and 0.01 mg/kg, respectively. For a deeper insight into the function of tested sorbents and to understand the effects of interfering matrix co-extracts, the two-dimensional GC coupled with the time-of-flight MS method was employed for the analysis of all purified extracts. Co-eluting major phytocannabinoids and free fatty acids were shown to be responsible for high “chemical noise”, increasing limits of quantification of pesticides at respective retention times. Since cannabis chemotypes fairly differ in phytocannabinoid content, the matrix effects, thus performance characteristics, may vary. Under such conditions, validation is recommended for different cannabis chemotypes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of separation science
Journal of separation science 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
408
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Separation Science (JSS) is the most comprehensive source in separation science, since it covers all areas of chromatographic and electrophoretic separation methods in theory and practice, both in the analytical and in the preparative mode, solid phase extraction, sample preparation, and related techniques. Manuscripts on methodological or instrumental developments, including detection aspects, in particular mass spectrometry, as well as on innovative applications will also be published. Manuscripts on hyphenation, automation, and miniaturization are particularly welcome. Pre- and post-separation facets of a total analysis may be covered as well as the underlying logic of the development or application of a method.
期刊最新文献
Development of a Non-Covalent Molecularly Imprinted Polymer via Precipitation Method for the Selective Separation of D-Xylose From Sugarcane Residues Comparison of Two Analytical Techniques of Biomass Burning Markers in PM1 and PM2.5 From Zabrze, Southern Poland Critical Assessment of Clean-up Procedures Used for Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Cannabis Inflorescence LC–MS-Based Simultaneous Determination of Biomarkers in Dried Urine Spots for the Detection of Cofactor-Dependent Metabolic Disorders in Neonates Primaquine Analysis in Pharmaceutical Formulation Using Multiple and Short-End Injections by Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Ultraviolet Detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1