{"title":"现代药物的体外药效和体内药代动力学参数的发展趋势:能否根据体外 Ki 和药代动力学参数估计治疗/亚治疗剂量?","authors":"Toshiaki Tsuchitani, Motohiro Kato, Atsuko Tomaru, Yasunori Aoki, Yuichi Sugiyama","doi":"10.1111/cts.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In drug discovery and development, estimating therapeutic and subtherapeutic doses is crucial for designing early-phase clinical trials, particularly first-in-human (FIH) studies. While increasing the in vitro pharmacological potency (lowering <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>) of a compound to its target is expected to decrease the therapeutic dose, its benefit is not necessarily clarified. We analyzed in vitro <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>, human in vivo pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters, and therapeutics doses of 144 oral small-molecule drugs approved in Japan (2010–2021). The data on classic drugs were obtained from Goodman and Gilman's textbook, 9th ed. (published in 1996). Modern drugs had lower <i>K</i><sub>i</sub> (2.5 nM) and daily doses (88 μmol/day) than classic drugs (33 nM and 313 μmol/day), but 3.6-fold higher intrinsic clearance (CL<sub>int</sub>; 171 vs. 47 L/h), suggest that increasing potency over the years has not resulted in a reduction in dosage as expected. Estimating therapeutic doses using target receptor occupancy (tRO)-optimized approach improved estimation accuracy (63% within 10-fold of observed values) compared with tRO-fixed approaches. Subtherapeutic dose estimations revealed a risk of overdosing in FIH trials, indicating that these estimates are not necessarily as conservative as is generally understood. Notably, the unbound average concentration-to-<i>K</i><sub>i</sub> ratio (<i>C</i><sub>ave,u</sub>/<i>K</i><sub>i</sub>) varied among drugs and correlated negatively with <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>, suggesting the possible necessity of incorporating it into dose estimation methods. This study provides insights into the relationship between in vitro <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>, in vivo PK parameters, and therapeutic dose of modern drugs, proposing strategies and revealing the risk for dose estimation and drug development in the era of highly potent small molecules.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"17 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends of in vitro pharmacological potency and in vivo pharmacokinetics parameters of modern drugs: Can the therapeutic/subtherapeutic dose be estimated from in vitro Ki and pharmacokinetic parameters?\",\"authors\":\"Toshiaki Tsuchitani, Motohiro Kato, Atsuko Tomaru, Yasunori Aoki, Yuichi Sugiyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In drug discovery and development, estimating therapeutic and subtherapeutic doses is crucial for designing early-phase clinical trials, particularly first-in-human (FIH) studies. While increasing the in vitro pharmacological potency (lowering <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>) of a compound to its target is expected to decrease the therapeutic dose, its benefit is not necessarily clarified. We analyzed in vitro <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>, human in vivo pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters, and therapeutics doses of 144 oral small-molecule drugs approved in Japan (2010–2021). The data on classic drugs were obtained from Goodman and Gilman's textbook, 9th ed. (published in 1996). Modern drugs had lower <i>K</i><sub>i</sub> (2.5 nM) and daily doses (88 μmol/day) than classic drugs (33 nM and 313 μmol/day), but 3.6-fold higher intrinsic clearance (CL<sub>int</sub>; 171 vs. 47 L/h), suggest that increasing potency over the years has not resulted in a reduction in dosage as expected. Estimating therapeutic doses using target receptor occupancy (tRO)-optimized approach improved estimation accuracy (63% within 10-fold of observed values) compared with tRO-fixed approaches. Subtherapeutic dose estimations revealed a risk of overdosing in FIH trials, indicating that these estimates are not necessarily as conservative as is generally understood. Notably, the unbound average concentration-to-<i>K</i><sub>i</sub> ratio (<i>C</i><sub>ave,u</sub>/<i>K</i><sub>i</sub>) varied among drugs and correlated negatively with <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>, suggesting the possible necessity of incorporating it into dose estimation methods. This study provides insights into the relationship between in vitro <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>, in vivo PK parameters, and therapeutic dose of modern drugs, proposing strategies and revealing the risk for dose estimation and drug development in the era of highly potent small molecules.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"17 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70034\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trends of in vitro pharmacological potency and in vivo pharmacokinetics parameters of modern drugs: Can the therapeutic/subtherapeutic dose be estimated from in vitro Ki and pharmacokinetic parameters?
In drug discovery and development, estimating therapeutic and subtherapeutic doses is crucial for designing early-phase clinical trials, particularly first-in-human (FIH) studies. While increasing the in vitro pharmacological potency (lowering Ki) of a compound to its target is expected to decrease the therapeutic dose, its benefit is not necessarily clarified. We analyzed in vitro Ki, human in vivo pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters, and therapeutics doses of 144 oral small-molecule drugs approved in Japan (2010–2021). The data on classic drugs were obtained from Goodman and Gilman's textbook, 9th ed. (published in 1996). Modern drugs had lower Ki (2.5 nM) and daily doses (88 μmol/day) than classic drugs (33 nM and 313 μmol/day), but 3.6-fold higher intrinsic clearance (CLint; 171 vs. 47 L/h), suggest that increasing potency over the years has not resulted in a reduction in dosage as expected. Estimating therapeutic doses using target receptor occupancy (tRO)-optimized approach improved estimation accuracy (63% within 10-fold of observed values) compared with tRO-fixed approaches. Subtherapeutic dose estimations revealed a risk of overdosing in FIH trials, indicating that these estimates are not necessarily as conservative as is generally understood. Notably, the unbound average concentration-to-Ki ratio (Cave,u/Ki) varied among drugs and correlated negatively with Ki, suggesting the possible necessity of incorporating it into dose estimation methods. This study provides insights into the relationship between in vitro Ki, in vivo PK parameters, and therapeutic dose of modern drugs, proposing strategies and revealing the risk for dose estimation and drug development in the era of highly potent small molecules.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.