中国家长对新生儿疾病筛查的认识和看法:一项基于问卷的研究。

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS BMC Medical Ethics Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1186/s12910-024-01145-6
Xiaoshan Yin, Peiyao Wang, Ziyan Cen, Zinan Yu, Qimin He, Benqing Wu, Xinwen Huang
{"title":"中国家长对新生儿疾病筛查的认识和看法:一项基于问卷的研究。","authors":"Xiaoshan Yin, Peiyao Wang, Ziyan Cen, Zinan Yu, Qimin He, Benqing Wu, Xinwen Huang","doi":"10.1186/s12910-024-01145-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low parental awareness and knowledge about newborn screening have been identified as a public issue. This study explored Chinese parents' self-evaluation of awareness, knowledge, and methods of receiving information about newborn screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using convenience sampling, we included 614 respondents who were expectant parents or parents of children aged 0-3 years. Our self-made questionnaire comprised four sections: sociodemographic characteristics, self-evaluation of awareness, detailed knowledge about newborn screening, and practical and expected methods of receiving newborn screening information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 72.9% of participants were classified as aware of newborn screening. However, only 14.2% of the participants received a passing score on the newborn screening detailed knowledge questions. Knowledge level about newborn screening was significantly associated with gender (P < .001), age (P < .05), education level (P < .05), residence (P < .05), family income (P < .05), and number of children (P < .05). The knowledge acquisition about newborn screening mainly came from hospital-related training (62.1%). Additionally, nearly half of the respondents (48.0%) expressed a preference for learning more about newborn screening through social media platforms, such as WeChat.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the majority of expectant or new parents were aware of newborn screening, only a minority had a thorough understanding of it. Various sociodemographic factors were associated with the level of parental knowledge about newborn screening. It is recommended to use hospital lectures or social media initiatives to educate parents in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental awareness and perspectives on newborn screening in China: a questionnaire-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoshan Yin, Peiyao Wang, Ziyan Cen, Zinan Yu, Qimin He, Benqing Wu, Xinwen Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12910-024-01145-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low parental awareness and knowledge about newborn screening have been identified as a public issue. This study explored Chinese parents' self-evaluation of awareness, knowledge, and methods of receiving information about newborn screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using convenience sampling, we included 614 respondents who were expectant parents or parents of children aged 0-3 years. Our self-made questionnaire comprised four sections: sociodemographic characteristics, self-evaluation of awareness, detailed knowledge about newborn screening, and practical and expected methods of receiving newborn screening information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 72.9% of participants were classified as aware of newborn screening. However, only 14.2% of the participants received a passing score on the newborn screening detailed knowledge questions. Knowledge level about newborn screening was significantly associated with gender (P < .001), age (P < .05), education level (P < .05), residence (P < .05), family income (P < .05), and number of children (P < .05). The knowledge acquisition about newborn screening mainly came from hospital-related training (62.1%). Additionally, nearly half of the respondents (48.0%) expressed a preference for learning more about newborn screening through social media platforms, such as WeChat.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the majority of expectant or new parents were aware of newborn screening, only a minority had a thorough understanding of it. Various sociodemographic factors were associated with the level of parental knowledge about newborn screening. It is recommended to use hospital lectures or social media initiatives to educate parents in China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590612/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01145-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01145-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:家长对新生儿疾病筛查的认识和知识不足已被认为是一个公共问题。本研究探讨了中国父母对新生儿疾病筛查的认识、知识和接受信息的方法的自我评价:方法:我们采用便利抽样的方法,纳入了 614 名准父母或 0-3 岁儿童的父母。我们自制的问卷包括四个部分:社会人口学特征、对新生儿筛查认知的自我评价、对新生儿筛查知识的详细了解以及接收新生儿筛查信息的实用方法和预期方法:我们发现,72.9% 的参与者对新生儿疾病筛查有所了解。然而,只有 14.2% 的参与者在新生儿筛查详细知识问题上获得了及格分数。新生儿筛查知识水平与性别有明显的相关性(P 结论:新生儿筛查知识水平与性别有明显的相关性:虽然大多数准父母或新父母都知道新生儿筛查,但只有少数人对其有透彻的了解。各种社会人口因素与父母对新生儿疾病筛查的了解程度有关。建议在中国利用医院讲座或社交媒体对父母进行教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parental awareness and perspectives on newborn screening in China: a questionnaire-based study.

Background: Low parental awareness and knowledge about newborn screening have been identified as a public issue. This study explored Chinese parents' self-evaluation of awareness, knowledge, and methods of receiving information about newborn screening.

Methods: Using convenience sampling, we included 614 respondents who were expectant parents or parents of children aged 0-3 years. Our self-made questionnaire comprised four sections: sociodemographic characteristics, self-evaluation of awareness, detailed knowledge about newborn screening, and practical and expected methods of receiving newborn screening information.

Results: We found that 72.9% of participants were classified as aware of newborn screening. However, only 14.2% of the participants received a passing score on the newborn screening detailed knowledge questions. Knowledge level about newborn screening was significantly associated with gender (P < .001), age (P < .05), education level (P < .05), residence (P < .05), family income (P < .05), and number of children (P < .05). The knowledge acquisition about newborn screening mainly came from hospital-related training (62.1%). Additionally, nearly half of the respondents (48.0%) expressed a preference for learning more about newborn screening through social media platforms, such as WeChat.

Conclusions: While the majority of expectant or new parents were aware of newborn screening, only a minority had a thorough understanding of it. Various sociodemographic factors were associated with the level of parental knowledge about newborn screening. It is recommended to use hospital lectures or social media initiatives to educate parents in China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
期刊最新文献
Patient autonomy and metabolic bariatric surgery: an empirical perspective. Physicians' moral distinctions between medical assistance in dying (MAiD) and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in Canada: a qualitative descriptive study. A qualitative study of the spirituality of volunteers registered for human organ donation. The impact of moral injury on healthcare workers' career calling: exploring authentic self-expression, ethical leadership, and self-compassion. Evaluating cognitive bias in clinical ethics supports: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1