印度妇女自主与生殖健康成果之间的关系

Charu Tayal , Rajesh Sharma , Kusum Lata
{"title":"印度妇女自主与生殖健康成果之间的关系","authors":"Charu Tayal ,&nbsp;Rajesh Sharma ,&nbsp;Kusum Lata","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In India, limited autonomy in maternal reproductive healthcare decision-making remains a persistent issue. This study investigates the impact of women’s autonomy in managing their healthcare on abortion history, knowledge of contraceptive methods, wanted pregnancy, and delivery via caesarean section in India.</div></div><div><h3>Data and methods</h3><div>The data for this study were extracted from two rounds of the Indian Demographic and Health Survey [DHS (2015–16) and DHS (2019–21)]. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression and time interaction regression model were employed to investigate the association between women’s autonomy in managing their healthcare and access to reproductive healthcare services.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Women whose healthcare decisions were jointly managed with their husband/partner had higher odds of having a wanted pregnancy [OR = 1.64; p&lt;0.01] in 2015–16 and [OR = 1.29; p&lt;0.10] in 2019–21 compared to women who managed healthcare decisions alone. However, the significance of shared healthcare decision-making in predicting a wanted pregnancy diminished between 2015–16 and 2019–21. In 2015–16, the odds of delivery via caesarean section were lower for women who managed their healthcare jointly with their husband/partner [OR = 0.79; p&lt;0.05] and for those whose healthcare decisions were made by someone else [OR = 0.57; p&lt;0.01] compared to women who managed healthcare decisions alone. Additionally, in 2015–16 when healthcare decisions were made by the husband/partner alone, women had significantly lower odds of knowing contraceptive methods [OR = 0.48; p&lt;0.05] compared to when women managed healthcare decisions alone. Furthermore, in each round, women with higher levels of education, health insurance coverage, from wealthier households, and those whose husbands were educated and older at the time of childbirth, had higher odds of having contraceptive knowledge and a wanted pregnancy in India.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In summary, we found that when healthcare decisions were made solely by the husband or partner, women had significantly lower odds of being knowledgeable about contraceptive methods. Furthermore, we found that the odds of delivery via caesarean section were lower when women jointly managed their healthcare with their partner. To achieve Sustainable Development Goal 3.7, which calls for universal access to sexual and reproductive healthcare services, it is crucial to promote informed reproductive choices, enhance contraceptive knowledge, and increase access to reproductive healthcare services in India.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between women’s autonomy and reproductive health outcomes in India\",\"authors\":\"Charu Tayal ,&nbsp;Rajesh Sharma ,&nbsp;Kusum Lata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In India, limited autonomy in maternal reproductive healthcare decision-making remains a persistent issue. This study investigates the impact of women’s autonomy in managing their healthcare on abortion history, knowledge of contraceptive methods, wanted pregnancy, and delivery via caesarean section in India.</div></div><div><h3>Data and methods</h3><div>The data for this study were extracted from two rounds of the Indian Demographic and Health Survey [DHS (2015–16) and DHS (2019–21)]. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression and time interaction regression model were employed to investigate the association between women’s autonomy in managing their healthcare and access to reproductive healthcare services.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Women whose healthcare decisions were jointly managed with their husband/partner had higher odds of having a wanted pregnancy [OR = 1.64; p&lt;0.01] in 2015–16 and [OR = 1.29; p&lt;0.10] in 2019–21 compared to women who managed healthcare decisions alone. However, the significance of shared healthcare decision-making in predicting a wanted pregnancy diminished between 2015–16 and 2019–21. In 2015–16, the odds of delivery via caesarean section were lower for women who managed their healthcare jointly with their husband/partner [OR = 0.79; p&lt;0.05] and for those whose healthcare decisions were made by someone else [OR = 0.57; p&lt;0.01] compared to women who managed healthcare decisions alone. Additionally, in 2015–16 when healthcare decisions were made by the husband/partner alone, women had significantly lower odds of knowing contraceptive methods [OR = 0.48; p&lt;0.05] compared to when women managed healthcare decisions alone. Furthermore, in each round, women with higher levels of education, health insurance coverage, from wealthier households, and those whose husbands were educated and older at the time of childbirth, had higher odds of having contraceptive knowledge and a wanted pregnancy in India.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In summary, we found that when healthcare decisions were made solely by the husband or partner, women had significantly lower odds of being knowledgeable about contraceptive methods. Furthermore, we found that the odds of delivery via caesarean section were lower when women jointly managed their healthcare with their partner. To achieve Sustainable Development Goal 3.7, which calls for universal access to sexual and reproductive healthcare services, it is crucial to promote informed reproductive choices, enhance contraceptive knowledge, and increase access to reproductive healthcare services in India.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X24001099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X24001099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在印度,产妇生殖保健决策自主权有限仍然是一个长期存在的问题。本研究调查了印度妇女自主管理其医疗保健对堕胎史、避孕方法知识、想要怀孕和剖腹产分娩的影响。数据和方法本研究的数据摘自两轮印度人口与健康调查[DHS(2015-16)和DHS(2019-21)]。采用描述性统计、logistic回归和时间交互回归模型,探讨妇女保健管理自主权与获得生殖保健服务的关系。结果与丈夫/伴侣共同管理医疗保健决策的妇女有更高的希望怀孕的几率[OR = 1.64;p<;0.01]和[OR = 1.29;P<;0.10]与单独管理医疗决策的女性相比。然而,2015-16年至2019-21年期间,共享医疗决策在预测想要怀孕方面的重要性有所下降。2015-16年,与丈夫/伴侣共同管理医疗保健的妇女剖腹产的几率较低[OR = 0.79;p<;0.05]以及由他人做出医疗决策的患者[OR = 0.57;P<;0.01]与单独管理医疗保健决策的女性相比。此外,在2015-16年,当医疗保健决定由丈夫/伴侣单独做出时,女性知道避孕方法的几率明显较低[OR = 0.48;P<;0.05]与女性单独管理医疗保健决策相比。此外,在每一轮调查中,教育水平较高、医疗保险覆盖面较广、家庭较富裕、丈夫受过教育且分娩时年龄较大的妇女掌握避孕知识和想要怀孕的几率更高。综上所述,我们发现,当医疗保健决定完全由丈夫或伴侣做出时,女性了解避孕方法的几率明显较低。此外,我们发现,当女性与伴侣共同管理医疗保健时,剖腹产的几率更低。要实现可持续发展目标3.7,其中要求普及性保健和生殖保健服务,就必须在印度促进知情的生殖选择,提高避孕知识,并增加获得生殖保健服务的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between women’s autonomy and reproductive health outcomes in India

Background

In India, limited autonomy in maternal reproductive healthcare decision-making remains a persistent issue. This study investigates the impact of women’s autonomy in managing their healthcare on abortion history, knowledge of contraceptive methods, wanted pregnancy, and delivery via caesarean section in India.

Data and methods

The data for this study were extracted from two rounds of the Indian Demographic and Health Survey [DHS (2015–16) and DHS (2019–21)]. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression and time interaction regression model were employed to investigate the association between women’s autonomy in managing their healthcare and access to reproductive healthcare services.

Results

Women whose healthcare decisions were jointly managed with their husband/partner had higher odds of having a wanted pregnancy [OR = 1.64; p<0.01] in 2015–16 and [OR = 1.29; p<0.10] in 2019–21 compared to women who managed healthcare decisions alone. However, the significance of shared healthcare decision-making in predicting a wanted pregnancy diminished between 2015–16 and 2019–21. In 2015–16, the odds of delivery via caesarean section were lower for women who managed their healthcare jointly with their husband/partner [OR = 0.79; p<0.05] and for those whose healthcare decisions were made by someone else [OR = 0.57; p<0.01] compared to women who managed healthcare decisions alone. Additionally, in 2015–16 when healthcare decisions were made by the husband/partner alone, women had significantly lower odds of knowing contraceptive methods [OR = 0.48; p<0.05] compared to when women managed healthcare decisions alone. Furthermore, in each round, women with higher levels of education, health insurance coverage, from wealthier households, and those whose husbands were educated and older at the time of childbirth, had higher odds of having contraceptive knowledge and a wanted pregnancy in India.

Conclusion

In summary, we found that when healthcare decisions were made solely by the husband or partner, women had significantly lower odds of being knowledgeable about contraceptive methods. Furthermore, we found that the odds of delivery via caesarean section were lower when women jointly managed their healthcare with their partner. To achieve Sustainable Development Goal 3.7, which calls for universal access to sexual and reproductive healthcare services, it is crucial to promote informed reproductive choices, enhance contraceptive knowledge, and increase access to reproductive healthcare services in India.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Online purchasing options for GLP-1 agonists: Accessibility, marketing practices, and consumer safety concerns Impact of patient-physician communication on cervical cancer screening among women aged 25–65 Interdisciplinary cross-sectoral strategies to mitigate health workforce migration in Africa The importance of an oncology database in planning melanoma prevention programs Skull reconstruction with titanium mesh following burr hole craniotomy for chronic subdural hematoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1