心肌收缩兴奋顺序对左心室力学响应的影响

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Medical Engineering & Physics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104255
Giorgos Troulliotis , Alison Duncan , Xiao Yun Xu , Alessandro Gandaglia , Fillipo Naso , Hendrik Versteeg , Saeed Mirsadraee , Sotiris Korossis
{"title":"心肌收缩兴奋顺序对左心室力学响应的影响","authors":"Giorgos Troulliotis ,&nbsp;Alison Duncan ,&nbsp;Xiao Yun Xu ,&nbsp;Alessandro Gandaglia ,&nbsp;Fillipo Naso ,&nbsp;Hendrik Versteeg ,&nbsp;Saeed Mirsadraee ,&nbsp;Sotiris Korossis","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the past two decades there has been rapid development in the field of computational cardiac models. These have included either (i) mechanical models that assumed simultaneous myocardial activation, or (ii) electromechanical models that assumed time-varying myocardial activation. The influence of these modelling assumptions of myocardial activation on clinically relevant metrics, like myocardial strain, commonly used for validation of cardiac models has yet to be systematically examined, leading to uncertainty over their influence on the predictions of these models. This study examined the effects of simultaneous (mechanical), uniform endocardial, 3-patch endocardial (simulating the fascicles of the His-Purkinje system) and 1-patch endocardial (simulating the atrioventricular node) excitation sequences on the mechanical response of a synthetic human left ventricular model. The influence of the duration of the activation and time-to-peak contraction was also investigated. The electromechanical and mechanical models produced different strain distributions in early systole. However, these differences decayed as systole progressed. Using the same activation duration (74 ms) the average peak-systolic circumferential strain difference between the models was 0.65±0.37 %. A slightly prolonged activation duration (134 ms) resulted in no substantial difference increase (0.76±0.47 %). Differences up to 3.5 % were observed for prolonged activation durations (200 ms). Endocardial excitation produced non-physiological cumulative activation time distributions compared to the other models. Septal 1-patch excitation resulted in early systolic strain response that resembled pathological left bundle branch block. Decreased time-to-peak contraction exaggerated the effects of electrophysiology. The study found that excitation sequence minimally affects strain distributions at peak systole for physiological and even slightly pathological activation durations. However, electromechanical models with (patho)physiologically informed activation sequences are important for the accurate prediction of early systolic and pathological late systolic responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 104255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of excitation sequence of myocardial contraction on the mechanical response of the left ventricle\",\"authors\":\"Giorgos Troulliotis ,&nbsp;Alison Duncan ,&nbsp;Xiao Yun Xu ,&nbsp;Alessandro Gandaglia ,&nbsp;Fillipo Naso ,&nbsp;Hendrik Versteeg ,&nbsp;Saeed Mirsadraee ,&nbsp;Sotiris Korossis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the past two decades there has been rapid development in the field of computational cardiac models. These have included either (i) mechanical models that assumed simultaneous myocardial activation, or (ii) electromechanical models that assumed time-varying myocardial activation. The influence of these modelling assumptions of myocardial activation on clinically relevant metrics, like myocardial strain, commonly used for validation of cardiac models has yet to be systematically examined, leading to uncertainty over their influence on the predictions of these models. This study examined the effects of simultaneous (mechanical), uniform endocardial, 3-patch endocardial (simulating the fascicles of the His-Purkinje system) and 1-patch endocardial (simulating the atrioventricular node) excitation sequences on the mechanical response of a synthetic human left ventricular model. The influence of the duration of the activation and time-to-peak contraction was also investigated. The electromechanical and mechanical models produced different strain distributions in early systole. However, these differences decayed as systole progressed. Using the same activation duration (74 ms) the average peak-systolic circumferential strain difference between the models was 0.65±0.37 %. A slightly prolonged activation duration (134 ms) resulted in no substantial difference increase (0.76±0.47 %). Differences up to 3.5 % were observed for prolonged activation durations (200 ms). Endocardial excitation produced non-physiological cumulative activation time distributions compared to the other models. Septal 1-patch excitation resulted in early systolic strain response that resembled pathological left bundle branch block. Decreased time-to-peak contraction exaggerated the effects of electrophysiology. The study found that excitation sequence minimally affects strain distributions at peak systole for physiological and even slightly pathological activation durations. However, electromechanical models with (patho)physiologically informed activation sequences are important for the accurate prediction of early systolic and pathological late systolic responses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"volume\":\"134 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324001565\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324001565","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的二十年中,计算心脏模型领域得到了迅速的发展。这些包括:(i)假设同时心肌激活的力学模型,或(ii)假设时变心肌激活的机电模型。这些心肌激活的建模假设对临床相关指标(如心肌应变)的影响,通常用于心脏模型的验证,但尚未被系统地检查,导致它们对这些模型预测的影响存在不确定性。本研究考察了同时(机械)、均匀心内膜、3片心内膜(模拟His-Purkinje系统的神经束)和1片心内膜(模拟房室结)兴奋序列对合成人左心室模型的机械反应的影响。研究了激活时间和收缩峰时的影响。机电模型和力学模型在收缩期早期产生了不同的应变分布。然而,随着收缩期的进展,这些差异逐渐消失。在相同的激活时间(74 ms)下,各模型之间的平均收缩峰值周应变差为0.65±0.37%。而稍微延长激活时间(134 ms)则没有显著的差异增加(0.76±0.47%)。在延长激活时间(200毫秒)时,观察到的差异高达3.5%。与其他模型相比,心内膜兴奋产生非生理性累积激活时间分布。室间隔1片兴奋导致早期收缩应变反应,类似病理性左束支阻滞。缩短的峰值收缩时间夸大了电生理的作用。研究发现,在生理甚至轻微的病理激活持续时间内,激励序列对收缩期峰值应变分布的影响最小。然而,具有(病理)生理信息激活序列的机电模型对于准确预测早期收缩和病理晚期收缩反应是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of excitation sequence of myocardial contraction on the mechanical response of the left ventricle
In the past two decades there has been rapid development in the field of computational cardiac models. These have included either (i) mechanical models that assumed simultaneous myocardial activation, or (ii) electromechanical models that assumed time-varying myocardial activation. The influence of these modelling assumptions of myocardial activation on clinically relevant metrics, like myocardial strain, commonly used for validation of cardiac models has yet to be systematically examined, leading to uncertainty over their influence on the predictions of these models. This study examined the effects of simultaneous (mechanical), uniform endocardial, 3-patch endocardial (simulating the fascicles of the His-Purkinje system) and 1-patch endocardial (simulating the atrioventricular node) excitation sequences on the mechanical response of a synthetic human left ventricular model. The influence of the duration of the activation and time-to-peak contraction was also investigated. The electromechanical and mechanical models produced different strain distributions in early systole. However, these differences decayed as systole progressed. Using the same activation duration (74 ms) the average peak-systolic circumferential strain difference between the models was 0.65±0.37 %. A slightly prolonged activation duration (134 ms) resulted in no substantial difference increase (0.76±0.47 %). Differences up to 3.5 % were observed for prolonged activation durations (200 ms). Endocardial excitation produced non-physiological cumulative activation time distributions compared to the other models. Septal 1-patch excitation resulted in early systolic strain response that resembled pathological left bundle branch block. Decreased time-to-peak contraction exaggerated the effects of electrophysiology. The study found that excitation sequence minimally affects strain distributions at peak systole for physiological and even slightly pathological activation durations. However, electromechanical models with (patho)physiologically informed activation sequences are important for the accurate prediction of early systolic and pathological late systolic responses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Engineering & Physics
Medical Engineering & Physics 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.
期刊最新文献
A patient-matched prosthesis for thumb amputations: Design, mechanical and functional evaluation Influence of surface type on outdoor gait parameters measured using an In-Shoe Motion Sensor System Assessment of pre- and post-operative gait dynamics in total knee arthroplasty by a wearable capture system A novel 3D lightweight model for COVID-19 lung CT Lesion Segmentation ResGloTBNet: An interpretable deep residual network with global long-range dependency for tuberculosis screening of sputum smear microscopy images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1