个性化患者数据和行为推动提高慢性心血管药物依从性

JAMA Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.21739
P. Michael Ho, Thomas J. Glorioso, Larry A. Allen, Richard Blankenhorn, Russell E. Glasgow, Gary K. Grunwald, Amber Khanna, David J. Magid, Joel Marrs, Sylvie Novins-Montague, Steven Orlando, Pamela Peterson, Mary E. Plomondon, Lisa M. Sandy, Joseph J. Saseen, Katy E. Trinkley, Shawni Vaughn, Joy Waughtal, Sheana Bull
{"title":"个性化患者数据和行为推动提高慢性心血管药物依从性","authors":"P. Michael Ho, Thomas J. Glorioso, Larry A. Allen, Richard Blankenhorn, Russell E. Glasgow, Gary K. Grunwald, Amber Khanna, David J. Magid, Joel Marrs, Sylvie Novins-Montague, Steven Orlando, Pamela Peterson, Mary E. Plomondon, Lisa M. Sandy, Joseph J. Saseen, Katy E. Trinkley, Shawni Vaughn, Joy Waughtal, Sheana Bull","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.21739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportancePoor medication adherence is common. Text messaging is increasingly used to change patient behavior but often not rigorously tested.ObjectiveTo compare different types of text messaging strategies with usual care to improve medication refill adherence among patients nonadherent to cardiovascular medications.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsPatient-level randomized pragmatic trial between October 2019 to April 2022 at 3 US health care systems, with last follow-up date of April 11, 2023. Adult (18 to &amp;amp;lt;90 years) patients were eligible based on diagnosis of 1 or more cardiovascular condition(s) and prescribed medication to treat the condition. Patients who did not opt out and had a 7-day refill gap were randomized to 1 of 4 study groups.Intervention(s)Generic text message refill reminders (generic reminder); behavioral nudge text refill reminders (behavioral nudge); behavioral nudge text refill reminders plus a fixed-message chatbot (behavioral nudge + chatbot); usual care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary outcome was refill adherence based on pharmacy data using proportion of days covered at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were clinical events of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and mortality.ResultsAmong 9501 enrolled patients, baseline characteristics across the 4 groups were comparable (mean age, 60 years; 47% female [n = 4351]; 16% Black [n = 1517]; 49% Hispanic [n = 4564]). At 12 months, the mean proportion of days covered was 62.0% for generic reminder, 62.3% for behavioral nudge, 63.0% for behavioral nudge + chatbot, and 60.6% for usual care (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .06). In adjusted analysis, when compared with usual care, mean proportion of days covered was 2.2 percentage points (95% CI, 0.3-4.2; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .02) higher for generic reminder, 2.0 percentage points (95% CI, 0.1-3.9; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .04) higher for behavioral nudge, and 2.3 percentage points (95%, 0.4-4.2; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .02) higher for behavioral nudge + chatbot, none of which were statistically significant after multiple comparisons correction. There were no differences in clinical events between study groups.Conclusions and RelevanceText message reminders targeting patients who delay refilling their cardiovascular medications did not improve medication adherence based on pharmacy refill data or reduce clinical events at 12 months. Poor medication adherence may be due to multiple factors. Future interventions may need to be designed to address the multiple factors influencing adherence.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03973931?id=NCT03973931&amp;amp;amp;rank=1\">NCT03973931</jats:ext-link>","PeriodicalId":518009,"journal":{"name":"JAMA","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized Patient Data and Behavioral Nudges to Improve Adherence to Chronic Cardiovascular Medications\",\"authors\":\"P. Michael Ho, Thomas J. Glorioso, Larry A. Allen, Richard Blankenhorn, Russell E. Glasgow, Gary K. Grunwald, Amber Khanna, David J. Magid, Joel Marrs, Sylvie Novins-Montague, Steven Orlando, Pamela Peterson, Mary E. Plomondon, Lisa M. Sandy, Joseph J. Saseen, Katy E. Trinkley, Shawni Vaughn, Joy Waughtal, Sheana Bull\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jama.2024.21739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ImportancePoor medication adherence is common. Text messaging is increasingly used to change patient behavior but often not rigorously tested.ObjectiveTo compare different types of text messaging strategies with usual care to improve medication refill adherence among patients nonadherent to cardiovascular medications.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsPatient-level randomized pragmatic trial between October 2019 to April 2022 at 3 US health care systems, with last follow-up date of April 11, 2023. Adult (18 to &amp;amp;lt;90 years) patients were eligible based on diagnosis of 1 or more cardiovascular condition(s) and prescribed medication to treat the condition. Patients who did not opt out and had a 7-day refill gap were randomized to 1 of 4 study groups.Intervention(s)Generic text message refill reminders (generic reminder); behavioral nudge text refill reminders (behavioral nudge); behavioral nudge text refill reminders plus a fixed-message chatbot (behavioral nudge + chatbot); usual care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary outcome was refill adherence based on pharmacy data using proportion of days covered at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were clinical events of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and mortality.ResultsAmong 9501 enrolled patients, baseline characteristics across the 4 groups were comparable (mean age, 60 years; 47% female [n = 4351]; 16% Black [n = 1517]; 49% Hispanic [n = 4564]). At 12 months, the mean proportion of days covered was 62.0% for generic reminder, 62.3% for behavioral nudge, 63.0% for behavioral nudge + chatbot, and 60.6% for usual care (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .06). In adjusted analysis, when compared with usual care, mean proportion of days covered was 2.2 percentage points (95% CI, 0.3-4.2; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .02) higher for generic reminder, 2.0 percentage points (95% CI, 0.1-3.9; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .04) higher for behavioral nudge, and 2.3 percentage points (95%, 0.4-4.2; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .02) higher for behavioral nudge + chatbot, none of which were statistically significant after multiple comparisons correction. There were no differences in clinical events between study groups.Conclusions and RelevanceText message reminders targeting patients who delay refilling their cardiovascular medications did not improve medication adherence based on pharmacy refill data or reduce clinical events at 12 months. Poor medication adherence may be due to multiple factors. Future interventions may need to be designed to address the multiple factors influencing adherence.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\" ext-link-type=\\\"uri\\\" xlink:href=\\\"https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03973931?id=NCT03973931&amp;amp;amp;rank=1\\\">NCT03973931</jats:ext-link>\",\"PeriodicalId\":518009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.21739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.21739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物依从性差是很常见的。短信越来越多地被用来改变病人的行为,但往往没有经过严格的测试。目的比较不同类型的短信策略与常规护理,以提高心血管药物不依从患者的药物补充依从性。设计、环境和参与者:2019年10月至2022年4月在3个美国医疗保健系统进行的患者水平随机实用试验,最后一次随访日期为2023年4月11日。成人(18岁至90岁)患者根据1种或1种以上心血管疾病的诊断和处方治疗条件入选。未选择退出且有7天补发间隔的患者被随机分为4个研究组中的1个。干预措施(s)通用短信补发提醒(通用提醒);行为轻推文本填充提醒(行为轻推);行为轻推文本补充提醒加上固定消息聊天机器人(行为轻推+聊天机器人);常规治疗。主要结果和测量方法主要结果是基于药房数据(使用12个月覆盖天数的比例)的补充依从性。次要结局是急诊科就诊、住院和死亡率的临床事件。结果在9501例入组患者中,4组的基线特征具有可比性(平均年龄60岁;女性占47% [n = 4351];16%黑色[n = 1517];49%的西班牙裔[n = 4564])。在12个月时,一般提醒的平均覆盖天数比例为62.0%,行为推动为62.3%,行为推动+聊天机器人为63.0%,常规护理为60.6% (P = 0.06)。在调整分析中,与常规护理相比,覆盖天数的平均比例为2.2个百分点(95% CI, 0.3-4.2;P = .02),一般提醒,2.0个百分点(95% CI, 0.1-3.9;P = 0.04),比前者高2.3个百分点(95%,0.4-4.2;P = .02)高于行为助推+聊天机器人,经多重比较校正后均无统计学意义。研究小组之间的临床事件没有差异。结论和相关性:基于药物补充数据,针对延迟补充心血管药物的患者的短信提醒并没有提高药物依从性或减少12个月的临床事件。药物依从性差可能是由多种因素造成的。未来的干预措施可能需要设计来解决影响依从性的多种因素。临床试验注册号:NCT03973931
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Personalized Patient Data and Behavioral Nudges to Improve Adherence to Chronic Cardiovascular Medications
ImportancePoor medication adherence is common. Text messaging is increasingly used to change patient behavior but often not rigorously tested.ObjectiveTo compare different types of text messaging strategies with usual care to improve medication refill adherence among patients nonadherent to cardiovascular medications.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsPatient-level randomized pragmatic trial between October 2019 to April 2022 at 3 US health care systems, with last follow-up date of April 11, 2023. Adult (18 to &amp;lt;90 years) patients were eligible based on diagnosis of 1 or more cardiovascular condition(s) and prescribed medication to treat the condition. Patients who did not opt out and had a 7-day refill gap were randomized to 1 of 4 study groups.Intervention(s)Generic text message refill reminders (generic reminder); behavioral nudge text refill reminders (behavioral nudge); behavioral nudge text refill reminders plus a fixed-message chatbot (behavioral nudge + chatbot); usual care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary outcome was refill adherence based on pharmacy data using proportion of days covered at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were clinical events of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and mortality.ResultsAmong 9501 enrolled patients, baseline characteristics across the 4 groups were comparable (mean age, 60 years; 47% female [n = 4351]; 16% Black [n = 1517]; 49% Hispanic [n = 4564]). At 12 months, the mean proportion of days covered was 62.0% for generic reminder, 62.3% for behavioral nudge, 63.0% for behavioral nudge + chatbot, and 60.6% for usual care (P = .06). In adjusted analysis, when compared with usual care, mean proportion of days covered was 2.2 percentage points (95% CI, 0.3-4.2; P = .02) higher for generic reminder, 2.0 percentage points (95% CI, 0.1-3.9; P = .04) higher for behavioral nudge, and 2.3 percentage points (95%, 0.4-4.2; P = .02) higher for behavioral nudge + chatbot, none of which were statistically significant after multiple comparisons correction. There were no differences in clinical events between study groups.Conclusions and RelevanceText message reminders targeting patients who delay refilling their cardiovascular medications did not improve medication adherence based on pharmacy refill data or reduce clinical events at 12 months. Poor medication adherence may be due to multiple factors. Future interventions may need to be designed to address the multiple factors influencing adherence.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03973931
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Match Day Adjuvant Atezolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Toward a Unified Vision for US Biomedical Research Molecular Phenotyping With Proteomics Palliative Care Program for Community-Dwelling Individuals With Dementia and Caregivers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1