集成失败还是集成风险?重新审视中国的返乡移民形态

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1007/s12061-024-09618-2
Zhigang Li, Le Yu, Feifan Gao, Hanbei Cheng, Yuqi Liu
{"title":"集成失败还是集成风险?重新审视中国的返乡移民形态","authors":"Zhigang Li,&nbsp;Le Yu,&nbsp;Feifan Gao,&nbsp;Hanbei Cheng,&nbsp;Yuqi Liu","doi":"10.1007/s12061-024-09618-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Return migration, specifically the return of rural migrants from large cities to their hometowns, has emerged as a notable phenomenon in China in the early 21st century. Existing studies primarily attribute this trend to integration failure, citing factors such as hukou policies, an unequal welfare system and unaffordable housing costs. In contrast to these institutional factors, few studies have examined migrants’ psychological integration, including dimensions such as perceived social integration (PSI) and willingness for social integration (WSI), in relation to their return decisions. To address this gap, this study utilizes data obtained from a questionnaire survey of 712 migrants in Wuhan conducted in 2018, investigating the interactions between PSI, WSI and migrants’ return decisions, as well as the impacts of these perceptions across different migrant groups. Our findings reveal that migrants perceive an ‘integration risk’ when their WSI exceeds their PSI, and this perceived integration risk (PIR) is positively correlated with their return decisions. Additionally, we find that variables such as health status, migration duration, income, neighborhood composition and participation in local activities influence migrants’ return decisions through the mediation of PIR. We argue that strengthening specific, targeted integration policies related to migrants’ PIR will facilitate their settlement in host cities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46392,"journal":{"name":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration Failure or Integration risk? Revisiting the Modality of Return Migration in China\",\"authors\":\"Zhigang Li,&nbsp;Le Yu,&nbsp;Feifan Gao,&nbsp;Hanbei Cheng,&nbsp;Yuqi Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12061-024-09618-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Return migration, specifically the return of rural migrants from large cities to their hometowns, has emerged as a notable phenomenon in China in the early 21st century. Existing studies primarily attribute this trend to integration failure, citing factors such as hukou policies, an unequal welfare system and unaffordable housing costs. In contrast to these institutional factors, few studies have examined migrants’ psychological integration, including dimensions such as perceived social integration (PSI) and willingness for social integration (WSI), in relation to their return decisions. To address this gap, this study utilizes data obtained from a questionnaire survey of 712 migrants in Wuhan conducted in 2018, investigating the interactions between PSI, WSI and migrants’ return decisions, as well as the impacts of these perceptions across different migrant groups. Our findings reveal that migrants perceive an ‘integration risk’ when their WSI exceeds their PSI, and this perceived integration risk (PIR) is positively correlated with their return decisions. Additionally, we find that variables such as health status, migration duration, income, neighborhood composition and participation in local activities influence migrants’ return decisions through the mediation of PIR. We argue that strengthening specific, targeted integration policies related to migrants’ PIR will facilitate their settlement in host cities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-024-09618-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-024-09618-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

返乡,特别是农村人口从大城市返回家乡,已成为21世纪初中国一个引人注目的现象。现有的研究主要将这一趋势归因于融合失败,并引用了户口政策、不平等的福利制度和负担不起的住房成本等因素。与这些制度因素相比,很少有研究考察移民的心理融合,包括与他们返回决定有关的感知社会融合(PSI)和社会融合意愿(WSI)等维度。为了解决这一差距,本研究利用2018年对武汉712名农民工进行的问卷调查数据,调查了PSI、WSI与农民工返乡决策之间的相互作用,以及这些观念对不同农民工群体的影响。我们的研究结果表明,当他们的WSI超过他们的PSI时,移民会感知到“整合风险”,这种感知的整合风险(PIR)与他们的回归决策呈正相关。此外,我们发现健康状况、迁移时间、收入、社区构成和当地活动参与等变量通过PIR的中介影响移民的回归决策。我们认为,加强与移民PIR相关的具体、有针对性的融合政策将有助于他们在东道城市定居。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integration Failure or Integration risk? Revisiting the Modality of Return Migration in China

Return migration, specifically the return of rural migrants from large cities to their hometowns, has emerged as a notable phenomenon in China in the early 21st century. Existing studies primarily attribute this trend to integration failure, citing factors such as hukou policies, an unequal welfare system and unaffordable housing costs. In contrast to these institutional factors, few studies have examined migrants’ psychological integration, including dimensions such as perceived social integration (PSI) and willingness for social integration (WSI), in relation to their return decisions. To address this gap, this study utilizes data obtained from a questionnaire survey of 712 migrants in Wuhan conducted in 2018, investigating the interactions between PSI, WSI and migrants’ return decisions, as well as the impacts of these perceptions across different migrant groups. Our findings reveal that migrants perceive an ‘integration risk’ when their WSI exceeds their PSI, and this perceived integration risk (PIR) is positively correlated with their return decisions. Additionally, we find that variables such as health status, migration duration, income, neighborhood composition and participation in local activities influence migrants’ return decisions through the mediation of PIR. We argue that strengthening specific, targeted integration policies related to migrants’ PIR will facilitate their settlement in host cities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Description The journal has an applied focus: it actively promotes the importance of geographical research in real world settings It is policy-relevant: it seeks both a readership and contributions from practitioners as well as academics The substantive foundation is spatial analysis: the use of quantitative techniques to identify patterns and processes within geographic environments The combination of these points, which are fully reflected in the naming of the journal, establishes a unique position in the marketplace. RationaleA geographical perspective has always been crucial to the understanding of the social and physical organisation of the world around us. The techniques of spatial analysis provide a powerful means for the assembly and interpretation of evidence, and thus to address critical questions about issues such as crime and deprivation, immigration and demographic restructuring, retailing activity and employment change, resource management and environmental improvement. Many of these issues are equally important to academic research as they are to policy makers and Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy aims to close the gap between these two perspectives by providing a forum for discussion of applied research in a range of different contexts  Topical and interdisciplinaryIncreasingly government organisations, administrative agencies and private businesses are requiring research to support their ‘evidence-based’ strategies or policies. Geographical location is critical in much of this work which extends across a wide range of disciplines including demography, actuarial sciences, statistics, public sector planning, business planning, economics, epidemiology, sociology, social policy, health research, environmental management.   FocusApplied Spatial Analysis and Policy will draw on applied research from diverse problem domains, such as transport, policing, education, health, environment and leisure, in different international contexts. The journal will therefore provide insights into the variations in phenomena that exist across space, it will provide evidence for comparative policy analysis between domains and between locations, and stimulate ideas about the translation of spatial analysis methods and techniques across varied policy contexts. It is essential to know how to measure, monitor and understand spatial distributions, many of which have implications for those with responsibility to plan and enhance the society and the environment in which we all exist.   Readership and Editorial BoardAs a journal focused on applications of methods of spatial analysis, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy will be of interest to scholars and students in a wide range of academic fields, to practitioners in government and administrative agencies and to consultants in private sector organisations. The Editorial Board reflects the international and multidisciplinary nature of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Downscaling Amphibian Species Richness Maps to Explore the Role of Spatial Scale in Conservation Beyond Numbers: Mapping Poverty Disparities in Pakistan through a Spatial Lens Linking Housing Prices and Innovation: The Role of Commuting Distance? Associations Between Cycling Facilities and Residential Property Values: A Case Study in a Growing Mid-sized City in Canada Exploring the Heterogenous Impacts of the Accessibility on Urban–Rural Disparity in Mountainous Regions of China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1