J. He, X. Wang, H. Zhang, X. Sun, M. Wu, D. Pi, W. Qin, Y. Hu
{"title":"聚氨酯涂层装甲复合结构的抗爆炸性能及防护机理研究:实验与模拟","authors":"J. He, X. Wang, H. Zhang, X. Sun, M. Wu, D. Pi, W. Qin, Y. Hu","doi":"10.1007/s00193-024-01190-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper focuses on the blast resistance performance and protection mechanism of a polyurea-sprayed vehicle armor composite structure under blast impact. We study the blast resistance performance of a steel plate with composite structures in four different spray configurations, which depend on whether spraying occurs and the spray position on the steel plate. First, near-field airburst tests are conducted for four different sprayed types of composite structures for a 2-kg TNT equivalent, and then, the test conditions are simulated using LS-DYNA software. Based on the verification of the accuracy of the calculation model, the dynamic response of the back-sprayed structure at different standoff distances is compared and analyzed. The test and simulation results reveal that compared with other spraying configurations, the back-sprayed structure has better blast resistance, and the low impedance ratio of the front-sprayed structure is the major cause of the aggravation of the structure damage. With the decrease in the standoff distance, the deformation range and flatness factor of the structure are constantly reduced, and the damage mode and protection mechanism of the composite structure keep changing. The blast resistance performance of polyurea is mainly based on the energy absorption and storage during the tensile phase and the energy release and dissipation during the rebound phase. For the back-sprayed structure, the steel plate is always the main energy-absorbing structure. In a certain load range, the energy absorption ratio of polyurea is proportional to the strength of the blast load. Additionally, when the load strength exceeds the tolerance limit of the surface steel plate, the blast resistance of polyurea cannot be effectively exerted. In such a case, the damage modes of steel plate and polyurea tend to be similar.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":775,"journal":{"name":"Shock Waves","volume":"34 6","pages":"591 - 607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of the blast resistance and protection mechanism of polyurea-coated armor composite structures: experiments and simulations\",\"authors\":\"J. He, X. Wang, H. Zhang, X. Sun, M. Wu, D. Pi, W. Qin, Y. Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00193-024-01190-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper focuses on the blast resistance performance and protection mechanism of a polyurea-sprayed vehicle armor composite structure under blast impact. We study the blast resistance performance of a steel plate with composite structures in four different spray configurations, which depend on whether spraying occurs and the spray position on the steel plate. First, near-field airburst tests are conducted for four different sprayed types of composite structures for a 2-kg TNT equivalent, and then, the test conditions are simulated using LS-DYNA software. Based on the verification of the accuracy of the calculation model, the dynamic response of the back-sprayed structure at different standoff distances is compared and analyzed. The test and simulation results reveal that compared with other spraying configurations, the back-sprayed structure has better blast resistance, and the low impedance ratio of the front-sprayed structure is the major cause of the aggravation of the structure damage. With the decrease in the standoff distance, the deformation range and flatness factor of the structure are constantly reduced, and the damage mode and protection mechanism of the composite structure keep changing. The blast resistance performance of polyurea is mainly based on the energy absorption and storage during the tensile phase and the energy release and dissipation during the rebound phase. For the back-sprayed structure, the steel plate is always the main energy-absorbing structure. In a certain load range, the energy absorption ratio of polyurea is proportional to the strength of the blast load. Additionally, when the load strength exceeds the tolerance limit of the surface steel plate, the blast resistance of polyurea cannot be effectively exerted. In such a case, the damage modes of steel plate and polyurea tend to be similar.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shock Waves\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"591 - 607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shock Waves\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-024-01190-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock Waves","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-024-01190-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究了聚氨酯喷涂汽车装甲复合材料结构在爆炸冲击下的抗爆炸性能和防护机理。研究了四种不同喷射方式下复合结构钢板的抗爆炸性能,这取决于是否发生喷射以及喷射在钢板上的位置。首先对4种不同喷施类型的复合结构进行了2 kg TNT当量近场空爆试验,并利用LS-DYNA软件对试验条件进行了模拟。在验证计算模型准确性的基础上,对比分析了背喷结构在不同距离下的动力响应。试验和仿真结果表明,与其他喷射方式相比,后喷结构具有更好的抗爆破性能,前喷结构阻抗比低是结构损伤加剧的主要原因。随着隔距的减小,结构的变形范围和平整度系数不断减小,复合材料结构的损伤模式和保护机制不断变化。聚脲的抗爆炸性能主要基于拉伸阶段的能量吸收和储存以及反弹阶段的能量释放和耗散。对于背喷结构,钢板一直是主要的吸能结构。在一定载荷范围内,聚脲的能量吸收比与爆炸载荷的强度成正比。此外,当载荷强度超过表面钢板的公差极限时,聚脲的抗爆炸性能不能有效发挥。在这种情况下,钢板和聚脲的损伤模式趋于相似。
Study of the blast resistance and protection mechanism of polyurea-coated armor composite structures: experiments and simulations
This paper focuses on the blast resistance performance and protection mechanism of a polyurea-sprayed vehicle armor composite structure under blast impact. We study the blast resistance performance of a steel plate with composite structures in four different spray configurations, which depend on whether spraying occurs and the spray position on the steel plate. First, near-field airburst tests are conducted for four different sprayed types of composite structures for a 2-kg TNT equivalent, and then, the test conditions are simulated using LS-DYNA software. Based on the verification of the accuracy of the calculation model, the dynamic response of the back-sprayed structure at different standoff distances is compared and analyzed. The test and simulation results reveal that compared with other spraying configurations, the back-sprayed structure has better blast resistance, and the low impedance ratio of the front-sprayed structure is the major cause of the aggravation of the structure damage. With the decrease in the standoff distance, the deformation range and flatness factor of the structure are constantly reduced, and the damage mode and protection mechanism of the composite structure keep changing. The blast resistance performance of polyurea is mainly based on the energy absorption and storage during the tensile phase and the energy release and dissipation during the rebound phase. For the back-sprayed structure, the steel plate is always the main energy-absorbing structure. In a certain load range, the energy absorption ratio of polyurea is proportional to the strength of the blast load. Additionally, when the load strength exceeds the tolerance limit of the surface steel plate, the blast resistance of polyurea cannot be effectively exerted. In such a case, the damage modes of steel plate and polyurea tend to be similar.
期刊介绍:
Shock Waves provides a forum for presenting and discussing new results in all fields where shock and detonation phenomena play a role. The journal addresses physicists, engineers and applied mathematicians working on theoretical, experimental or numerical issues, including diagnostics and flow visualization.
The research fields considered include, but are not limited to, aero- and gas dynamics, acoustics, physical chemistry, condensed matter and plasmas, with applications encompassing materials sciences, space sciences, geosciences, life sciences and medicine.
Of particular interest are contributions which provide insights into fundamental aspects of the techniques that are relevant to more than one specific research community.
The journal publishes scholarly research papers, invited review articles and short notes, as well as comments on papers already published in this journal. Occasionally concise meeting reports of interest to the Shock Waves community are published.