Karim Hafazalla, Matthews Lan, Keenan Piper, Preston Carey, Omaditya Khanna, Wenyin Shi, James J Evans, David Andrews, Kevin Judy, Christopher J Farrell
{"title":"立体定向放疗作为颅底脑膜瘤的主要治疗后颅神经病变的改善。","authors":"Karim Hafazalla, Matthews Lan, Keenan Piper, Preston Carey, Omaditya Khanna, Wenyin Shi, James J Evans, David Andrews, Kevin Judy, Christopher J Farrell","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2024.2427720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many patients with skull base meningiomas (SBMs) develop cranial neuropathies, though there is a paucity in literature regarding cranial neuropathy improvement following treatment. This is even more profound when isolating for patients who received stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) as their primary treatment without additional open surgery. Our goal was to investigate the effect of SRT on cranial neuropathies secondary to SBMs and identify predictors of favourable treatment response.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective case-control study was performed assessing factors associated with cranial neuropathy improvement in patients with SBMs treated with SRT alone. Patients diagnosed with SBMs, having a cranial neuropathy, and treatment with radiation monotherapy were included. Patients without SBMs or who underwent surgery treatments were excluded. Patients with olfactory and vestibulocochlear neuropathies were ultimately excluded due to sample sizes. Subgroup analysis was performed assessing predictors of improvement for optic, extraocular, and trigeminal neuropathy. Statistical analysis was completed using R version 4.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five patients met the inclusion criteria of SBMs treated with SRT alone. Forty-five patients (52.9%) had improvement in their symptoms. Among the entire cohort, there was no significant difference between gender, age, tumour location, type of neuropathy, duration of symptoms, tumour volume, total radiation dose, or follow-up duration between those who did and those who did not improve. Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant improvement with younger age at diagnosis of optic neuropathy (50.7 vs 59.6 years, <i>p</i> = 0.04), shorter duration of symptoms prior to radiation in those with extraocular neuropathy (3.0 vs 11.5 months, <i>p</i> = 0.02), and lower radiation dose in those with trigeminal neuropathy (50.0 vs 54.0 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that SRT alone resulted in cranial neuropathy improvement in more than half of patients with SBM and identifies factors predictive of symptom resolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement in cranial neuropathies following stereotactic radiotherapy as primary treatment for skull base meningiomas.\",\"authors\":\"Karim Hafazalla, Matthews Lan, Keenan Piper, Preston Carey, Omaditya Khanna, Wenyin Shi, James J Evans, David Andrews, Kevin Judy, Christopher J Farrell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02688697.2024.2427720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many patients with skull base meningiomas (SBMs) develop cranial neuropathies, though there is a paucity in literature regarding cranial neuropathy improvement following treatment. This is even more profound when isolating for patients who received stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) as their primary treatment without additional open surgery. Our goal was to investigate the effect of SRT on cranial neuropathies secondary to SBMs and identify predictors of favourable treatment response.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective case-control study was performed assessing factors associated with cranial neuropathy improvement in patients with SBMs treated with SRT alone. Patients diagnosed with SBMs, having a cranial neuropathy, and treatment with radiation monotherapy were included. Patients without SBMs or who underwent surgery treatments were excluded. Patients with olfactory and vestibulocochlear neuropathies were ultimately excluded due to sample sizes. Subgroup analysis was performed assessing predictors of improvement for optic, extraocular, and trigeminal neuropathy. Statistical analysis was completed using R version 4.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five patients met the inclusion criteria of SBMs treated with SRT alone. Forty-five patients (52.9%) had improvement in their symptoms. Among the entire cohort, there was no significant difference between gender, age, tumour location, type of neuropathy, duration of symptoms, tumour volume, total radiation dose, or follow-up duration between those who did and those who did not improve. Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant improvement with younger age at diagnosis of optic neuropathy (50.7 vs 59.6 years, <i>p</i> = 0.04), shorter duration of symptoms prior to radiation in those with extraocular neuropathy (3.0 vs 11.5 months, <i>p</i> = 0.02), and lower radiation dose in those with trigeminal neuropathy (50.0 vs 54.0 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that SRT alone resulted in cranial neuropathy improvement in more than half of patients with SBM and identifies factors predictive of symptom resolution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2024.2427720\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2024.2427720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:许多颅底脑膜瘤(SBMs)患者发展为颅神经病变,尽管文献中缺乏关于治疗后颅神经病变改善的报道。当隔离接受立体定向放疗(SRT)作为主要治疗而不进行额外开放手术的患者时,这一点就更加深刻了。我们的目的是研究SRT对SBMs继发脑神经病变的影响,并确定良好治疗反应的预测因素。材料和方法:进行单中心回顾性病例对照研究,评估单纯SRT治疗的SBMs患者颅神经病变改善的相关因素。诊断为SBMs,有颅神经病变,并接受放射单一治疗的患者包括在内。没有SBMs或接受过手术治疗的患者被排除在外。由于样本量的限制,嗅觉和前庭耳蜗神经病变患者最终被排除在外。亚组分析评估视神经、眼外神经和三叉神经病变改善的预测因素。统计分析使用R 4.0版本(R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria)完成。结果:85例患者符合单纯SRT治疗SBMs的纳入标准。45例(52.9%)患者症状改善。在整个队列中,性别、年龄、肿瘤位置、神经病变类型、症状持续时间、肿瘤体积、总辐射剂量或随访时间在改善者和未改善者之间无显著差异。亚组分析显示,视神经病变诊断年龄越小,症状改善越明显(50.7岁vs 59.6岁,p = 0.04),眼外神经病变患者放射前症状持续时间越短(3.0个月vs 11.5个月,p = 0.02),三叉神经病变患者放射剂量越低(50.0 Gy vs 54.0 Gy, p = 0.01)。结论:本研究表明,SRT可使超过一半的SBM患者的颅神经病变得到改善,并确定了预测症状缓解的因素。
Improvement in cranial neuropathies following stereotactic radiotherapy as primary treatment for skull base meningiomas.
Purpose: Many patients with skull base meningiomas (SBMs) develop cranial neuropathies, though there is a paucity in literature regarding cranial neuropathy improvement following treatment. This is even more profound when isolating for patients who received stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) as their primary treatment without additional open surgery. Our goal was to investigate the effect of SRT on cranial neuropathies secondary to SBMs and identify predictors of favourable treatment response.
Materials and methods: A single-center retrospective case-control study was performed assessing factors associated with cranial neuropathy improvement in patients with SBMs treated with SRT alone. Patients diagnosed with SBMs, having a cranial neuropathy, and treatment with radiation monotherapy were included. Patients without SBMs or who underwent surgery treatments were excluded. Patients with olfactory and vestibulocochlear neuropathies were ultimately excluded due to sample sizes. Subgroup analysis was performed assessing predictors of improvement for optic, extraocular, and trigeminal neuropathy. Statistical analysis was completed using R version 4.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results: Eighty-five patients met the inclusion criteria of SBMs treated with SRT alone. Forty-five patients (52.9%) had improvement in their symptoms. Among the entire cohort, there was no significant difference between gender, age, tumour location, type of neuropathy, duration of symptoms, tumour volume, total radiation dose, or follow-up duration between those who did and those who did not improve. Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant improvement with younger age at diagnosis of optic neuropathy (50.7 vs 59.6 years, p = 0.04), shorter duration of symptoms prior to radiation in those with extraocular neuropathy (3.0 vs 11.5 months, p = 0.02), and lower radiation dose in those with trigeminal neuropathy (50.0 vs 54.0 Gy, p = 0.01).
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that SRT alone resulted in cranial neuropathy improvement in more than half of patients with SBM and identifies factors predictive of symptom resolution.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide.
Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.