原发性胆道胆管炎目前和未来二线治疗的综述。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08742-w
Nicholas A Cumpian, Gina Choi, Sammy Saab
{"title":"原发性胆道胆管炎目前和未来二线治疗的综述。","authors":"Nicholas A Cumpian, Gina Choi, Sammy Saab","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08742-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) was defined by its singular relationship with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for decades. However, nearly 40% of patients fail to achieve adequate biochemical response with UDCA, necessitating second-line therapies.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of our review was to assess the efficacy and safety of second-line therapies for PBC from phase three trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Medline, and ClinicalTrials.gov for published phase three trial data of second-line PBC therapies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four phase three clinical trial evaluating obeticholic acid, bezafibrate, seladelpar, and elafibranor, were identified. All trials but one defined the treatment endpoints of an alkaline phosphatase (ALP) less than 1.67 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), a 15% decrease of ALP from baseline, and normal total bilirubin (TB) after 12 months. All therapies demonstrated statistically significant achievement of primary endpoints relative to placebo. Reduction in ALP from baseline ranged from 113 to 133.9 U/L (- 34.6% to - 50%) across all trials. Primary endpoint treatment differences relative to placebo ranged between 31 and 47%. ALP normalization rates were described for three treatments and varied between 15 and 67% in treatment cohorts,compared to 0% to 2% of placebo cohorts. Only elafibranor and seladelpar demonstrated significant reduction in total 5D itch scale scores. Discontinuation rates across studies ranged from 1 to 14% due to adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All reviewed therapies met their respective study endpoints. Effective second-line therapies area available and continue to receive long-term evaluation in patients with PBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"100-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Current and Upcoming Second-Line Treatments for Primary Biliary Cholangitis.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas A Cumpian, Gina Choi, Sammy Saab\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-024-08742-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) was defined by its singular relationship with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for decades. However, nearly 40% of patients fail to achieve adequate biochemical response with UDCA, necessitating second-line therapies.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of our review was to assess the efficacy and safety of second-line therapies for PBC from phase three trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Medline, and ClinicalTrials.gov for published phase three trial data of second-line PBC therapies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four phase three clinical trial evaluating obeticholic acid, bezafibrate, seladelpar, and elafibranor, were identified. All trials but one defined the treatment endpoints of an alkaline phosphatase (ALP) less than 1.67 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), a 15% decrease of ALP from baseline, and normal total bilirubin (TB) after 12 months. All therapies demonstrated statistically significant achievement of primary endpoints relative to placebo. Reduction in ALP from baseline ranged from 113 to 133.9 U/L (- 34.6% to - 50%) across all trials. Primary endpoint treatment differences relative to placebo ranged between 31 and 47%. ALP normalization rates were described for three treatments and varied between 15 and 67% in treatment cohorts,compared to 0% to 2% of placebo cohorts. Only elafibranor and seladelpar demonstrated significant reduction in total 5D itch scale scores. Discontinuation rates across studies ranged from 1 to 14% due to adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All reviewed therapies met their respective study endpoints. Effective second-line therapies area available and continue to receive long-term evaluation in patients with PBC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08742-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08742-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:几十年来,原发性胆管炎(PBC)的治疗一直被其与熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)的单一关系所定义。然而,近40%的患者使用UDCA未能达到足够的生化反应,需要二线治疗。目的:我们综述的目的是评估三期临床试验中二线治疗PBC的有效性和安全性。方法:我们对PubMed、Medline和ClinicalTrials.gov网站上已发表的二线PBC治疗的三期试验数据进行了系统回顾。结果:确定了四项评估奥贝胆酸、贝扎贝特、seladelpar和elafbranor的三期临床试验。除一项试验外,所有试验均确定治疗终点为碱性磷酸酶(ALP)低于正常上限(ULN)的1.67倍,ALP较基线下降15%,12个月后总胆红素(TB)正常。与安慰剂相比,所有治疗方法的主要终点均有统计学意义。在所有试验中,ALP较基线降低范围为113至133.9 U/L(- 34.6%至- 50%)。与安慰剂相比,主要终点治疗差异在31%到47%之间。三种治疗的ALP正常化率在治疗组中为15% - 67%,而安慰剂组为0% - 2%。只有elafbranor和seladelpar表现出5D瘙痒量表总分的显著降低。由于不良反应,所有研究的停药率从1%到14%不等。结论:所有回顾的治疗方法均达到各自的研究终点。对于PBC患者,有效的二线治疗是可用的,并将继续接受长期评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review of Current and Upcoming Second-Line Treatments for Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

Background: Treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) was defined by its singular relationship with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for decades. However, nearly 40% of patients fail to achieve adequate biochemical response with UDCA, necessitating second-line therapies.

Aims: The aim of our review was to assess the efficacy and safety of second-line therapies for PBC from phase three trials.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Medline, and ClinicalTrials.gov for published phase three trial data of second-line PBC therapies.

Results: Four phase three clinical trial evaluating obeticholic acid, bezafibrate, seladelpar, and elafibranor, were identified. All trials but one defined the treatment endpoints of an alkaline phosphatase (ALP) less than 1.67 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), a 15% decrease of ALP from baseline, and normal total bilirubin (TB) after 12 months. All therapies demonstrated statistically significant achievement of primary endpoints relative to placebo. Reduction in ALP from baseline ranged from 113 to 133.9 U/L (- 34.6% to - 50%) across all trials. Primary endpoint treatment differences relative to placebo ranged between 31 and 47%. ALP normalization rates were described for three treatments and varied between 15 and 67% in treatment cohorts,compared to 0% to 2% of placebo cohorts. Only elafibranor and seladelpar demonstrated significant reduction in total 5D itch scale scores. Discontinuation rates across studies ranged from 1 to 14% due to adverse effects.

Conclusion: All reviewed therapies met their respective study endpoints. Effective second-line therapies area available and continue to receive long-term evaluation in patients with PBC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Ethics Consultations in Cirrhosis Care. A Residual Laterally Spreading Tumor that Regressed After Chemotherapy Following Surgical Resection of Sigmoid Cancer. Are Non-invasive Multi-cancer Early Cancer Detection Tests the Future? Cholangioscope-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy in the Management of Chronic Abdominal Pain Related to the Appendix: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Results of Endoscopic Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Biliary Obstruction in Patients with Self-Expanding Metal Stents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1