用载动脉分流装置治疗颅内动脉瘤破裂:一项全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY International Journal of Stroke Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1177/17474930241307114
Henrique L Lepine, Gabriel Semione, Fernanda M Llata, Bernardo Vieira Nogueira, Ana Clara Pinto Galvão Pereira, Davi Neves Coelho, Rafael Reis de Oliveira, Fabrício Ferreira Lipi, Henrique Garcia Maia, Anthony Hong, Luan Cavalcante Vilaça Lima, Savio Batista, Raphael Bertani, Bipin Chaurasia, João de Deus, Nirav Patel, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
{"title":"用载动脉分流装置治疗颅内动脉瘤破裂:一项全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Henrique L Lepine, Gabriel Semione, Fernanda M Llata, Bernardo Vieira Nogueira, Ana Clara Pinto Galvão Pereira, Davi Neves Coelho, Rafael Reis de Oliveira, Fabrício Ferreira Lipi, Henrique Garcia Maia, Anthony Hong, Luan Cavalcante Vilaça Lima, Savio Batista, Raphael Bertani, Bipin Chaurasia, João de Deus, Nirav Patel, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo","doi":"10.1177/17474930241307114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical clipping and endovascular coiling are well-established treatments for acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms leading to acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, these modalities have limitations, particularly in cases involving wide-necked, bifurcating, or dissecting aneurysms. Flow diverter (FD) devices, initially used for unruptured aneurysms, have emerged as an alternative treatment for ruptured aneurysms despite concerns about hemorrhagic complications.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of parental artery FD devices in treating ruptured intracranial aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to July 2024. The inclusion criteria focused on studies involving patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms treated with parental artery FDs, with or without adjunctive coiling. Studies were required to report clear, stratified data specific to the population of interest, and include more than five patients. Exclusion criteria included studies on non-ruptured aneurysms, intrasaccular flow diversion devices, or previously clipped aneurysms treated with FD. Data extraction was performed independently by two authors, and statistical analysis included single proportion analysis with 95% confidence intervals under a random-effects model, using R Studio. The primary outcome was the rate of aneurysm occlusion at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Summary of review: </strong>A total of 60 studies encompassing 1300 patients were included. The primary outcome analysis revealed a 90% (95% CI: 87-92%; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 51%) rate of total occlusion at follow-up. Subgroup analysis indicated an occlusion rate of 89% for anterior circulation aneurysms and 96% for posterior circulation aneurysms. Intraoperative complications occurred in 6% of cases, while postoperative complications were observed in 13%. Rebleeding rates were low at 1%, with a 2% need for retreatment. Good functional outcomes (mRS ⩽ 2) were achieved in 82% of patients, and the overall mortality rate was 4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FD devices demonstrated high rates of aneurysm occlusion and favorable functional outcomes in patients with acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms. However, the low mortality rate and favorable outcomes observed may reflect selection bias toward patients with less severe SAH. Despite a modest complication rate, the overall safety and efficacy of FD devices suggest they may be a viable alternative to traditional treatments for specific aneurysm types. Further studies, including a broader spectrum of SAH severities, are warranted to optimize their use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930241307114"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with parent artery flow diverter devices: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Henrique L Lepine, Gabriel Semione, Fernanda M Llata, Bernardo Vieira Nogueira, Ana Clara Pinto Galvão Pereira, Davi Neves Coelho, Rafael Reis de Oliveira, Fabrício Ferreira Lipi, Henrique Garcia Maia, Anthony Hong, Luan Cavalcante Vilaça Lima, Savio Batista, Raphael Bertani, Bipin Chaurasia, João de Deus, Nirav Patel, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17474930241307114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical clipping and endovascular coiling are well-established treatments for acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms leading to acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, these modalities have limitations, particularly in cases involving wide-necked, bifurcating, or dissecting aneurysms. Flow diverter (FD) devices, initially used for unruptured aneurysms, have emerged as an alternative treatment for ruptured aneurysms despite concerns about hemorrhagic complications.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of parental artery FD devices in treating ruptured intracranial aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to July 2024. The inclusion criteria focused on studies involving patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms treated with parental artery FDs, with or without adjunctive coiling. Studies were required to report clear, stratified data specific to the population of interest, and include more than five patients. Exclusion criteria included studies on non-ruptured aneurysms, intrasaccular flow diversion devices, or previously clipped aneurysms treated with FD. Data extraction was performed independently by two authors, and statistical analysis included single proportion analysis with 95% confidence intervals under a random-effects model, using R Studio. The primary outcome was the rate of aneurysm occlusion at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Summary of review: </strong>A total of 60 studies encompassing 1300 patients were included. The primary outcome analysis revealed a 90% (95% CI: 87-92%; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 51%) rate of total occlusion at follow-up. Subgroup analysis indicated an occlusion rate of 89% for anterior circulation aneurysms and 96% for posterior circulation aneurysms. Intraoperative complications occurred in 6% of cases, while postoperative complications were observed in 13%. Rebleeding rates were low at 1%, with a 2% need for retreatment. Good functional outcomes (mRS ⩽ 2) were achieved in 82% of patients, and the overall mortality rate was 4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FD devices demonstrated high rates of aneurysm occlusion and favorable functional outcomes in patients with acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms. However, the low mortality rate and favorable outcomes observed may reflect selection bias toward patients with less severe SAH. Despite a modest complication rate, the overall safety and efficacy of FD devices suggest they may be a viable alternative to traditional treatments for specific aneurysm types. Further studies, including a broader spectrum of SAH severities, are warranted to optimize their use in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17474930241307114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241307114\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241307114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术夹持和血管内盘绕是治疗急性破裂颅内动脉瘤导致急性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)的有效方法。然而,这些方法有局限性,特别是在涉及宽颈、分叉或夹层动脉瘤的病例中。血流分流器(FD)最初用于未破裂动脉瘤,尽管担心出血并发症,但已成为破裂动脉瘤的替代治疗方法。目的:本研究旨在进行一项全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估载动脉FD装置治疗颅内动脉瘤破裂的有效性和安全性。方法:系统检索Medline、Embase和Cochrane数据库,检索时间自成立至2024年7月。纳入标准主要集中在急性破裂动脉瘤患者采用载动脉fd治疗,伴或不伴辅助栓塞的研究。研究需要报告明确的、分层的数据,特定于感兴趣的人群,并且包括5名以上的患者。排除标准包括未破裂动脉瘤、带内分流装置或先前用FD治疗的夹闭动脉瘤的研究。数据提取由两位作者独立完成,统计分析采用随机效应模型下的单比例分析,95%置信区间,使用R Studio。主要观察指标为随访时动脉瘤闭塞率。综述摘要:纳入60项研究,共1300例患者。主要结局分析显示90% (95% CI: 87% - 92%;I2= 51%)随访时全闭塞率。亚组分析显示前循环动脉瘤的闭塞率为89%,后循环动脉瘤的闭塞率为96%。术中并发症发生率为6%,术后并发症发生率为13%。再出血率低至1%,需要再治疗的为2%。82%的患者获得了良好的功能结局(mRS≤2),总死亡率为4%。结论:FD装置在急性颅内动脉瘤破裂患者中显示出较高的动脉瘤闭塞率和良好的功能预后。然而,观察到的低死亡率和良好的预后可能反映了对较轻SAH患者的选择偏倚。尽管并发症发生率不高,但FD装置的总体安全性和有效性表明,对于特定类型的动脉瘤,FD装置可能是传统治疗方法的可行替代方案。进一步的研究,包括更广泛的SAH严重程度,有必要优化其在临床实践中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with parent artery flow diverter devices: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Surgical clipping and endovascular coiling are well-established treatments for acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms leading to acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, these modalities have limitations, particularly in cases involving wide-necked, bifurcating, or dissecting aneurysms. Flow diverter (FD) devices, initially used for unruptured aneurysms, have emerged as an alternative treatment for ruptured aneurysms despite concerns about hemorrhagic complications.

Aims: This study aimed to perform a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of parental artery FD devices in treating ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to July 2024. The inclusion criteria focused on studies involving patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms treated with parental artery FDs, with or without adjunctive coiling. Studies were required to report clear, stratified data specific to the population of interest, and include more than five patients. Exclusion criteria included studies on non-ruptured aneurysms, intrasaccular flow diversion devices, or previously clipped aneurysms treated with FD. Data extraction was performed independently by two authors, and statistical analysis included single proportion analysis with 95% confidence intervals under a random-effects model, using R Studio. The primary outcome was the rate of aneurysm occlusion at follow-up.

Summary of review: A total of 60 studies encompassing 1300 patients were included. The primary outcome analysis revealed a 90% (95% CI: 87-92%; I2 = 51%) rate of total occlusion at follow-up. Subgroup analysis indicated an occlusion rate of 89% for anterior circulation aneurysms and 96% for posterior circulation aneurysms. Intraoperative complications occurred in 6% of cases, while postoperative complications were observed in 13%. Rebleeding rates were low at 1%, with a 2% need for retreatment. Good functional outcomes (mRS ⩽ 2) were achieved in 82% of patients, and the overall mortality rate was 4%.

Conclusions: FD devices demonstrated high rates of aneurysm occlusion and favorable functional outcomes in patients with acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms. However, the low mortality rate and favorable outcomes observed may reflect selection bias toward patients with less severe SAH. Despite a modest complication rate, the overall safety and efficacy of FD devices suggest they may be a viable alternative to traditional treatments for specific aneurysm types. Further studies, including a broader spectrum of SAH severities, are warranted to optimize their use in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Collaterals and outcomes after endovascular treatment in acute large vessel occlusion: Disparity by stroke etiologies. Prevalence of carotid plaques with high-risk features in embolic stroke of undetermined source: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Comparative Outcomes of Arteriovenous Malformations treatment in Eloquent versus Non-Eloquent Brain: A Multicenter Study with Propensity-Score Weighting. Andexanet alfa in patients with factor Xa inhibitor-associated intracranial hemorrhage: The prospective observational multicenter ASTRO-DE study. Predicting Stroke in Patients with Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1