正式物理治疗可改善踝关节ORIF后高焦虑患者的预后。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002940
Willie Dong, Makoa Mau, Silvia Soule, Eleanor Sato, Tyler Thorne, Thomas Higgins, David Rothberg, Lucas Marchand, Justin Haller
{"title":"正式物理治疗可改善踝关节ORIF后高焦虑患者的预后。","authors":"Willie Dong, Makoa Mau, Silvia Soule, Eleanor Sato, Tyler Thorne, Thomas Higgins, David Rothberg, Lucas Marchand, Justin Haller","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare outcomes after ankle fracture fixation between those receiving formal physical therapy (PT) vs. no formal PT and those with high vs. low PROMIS anxiety score (AS), and to evaluate the effect of PT in the setting of PROMIS AS scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients aged > 18 undergoing isolated ankle fracture (OTA/AO 44A, 44B, 44C) fixation with documented PROMIS scores postoperatively.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: The post-operative PROMIS physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) were compared between patients receiving formal PT vs. no PT and those with baseline high vs. low PROMIS AS scores. A sub-analysis was performed between patients with low anxiety and no PT (LANP) vs. low anxiety with PT (LAP) vs. high anxiety and no PT (HANP), and high anxiety with PT (HAP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 161 patients, 111 females (68.9%), with an average age of 46 years (range: 72), were included in this study: 127 PT, 34 no PT, 88 low anxiety, and 73 high anxiety. PT did not yield any significant differences in PROMIS PF (44.9 PT vs 42.6 no PT, p=0.180) or PI (53.5 PT vs 54.4 no PT, p=0.656) at final follow-up. At final follow-up, high anxiety patients had similar PROMIS PF (43.0) vs. low anxiety patients (45.5, p=0.088), but significantly worse PROMIS PI scores (51.5 vs. 56.7, respectively; p=0.001). Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant difference in age between high and low anxiety patients and was thus selected as a control variable in the analysis of HANP, HAP, LANP, and LAP. After controlling for age, pairwise comparisons of estimated PROMIS PF scores at final follow-up were significantly lower for HANP (39.0) than HAP (43.9, p=0.05), LANP (45.1, p=0.05), and LAP patients (45.9, p=0.04). Final PROMIS PI scores were significantly worse for HANP (59.1) and HAP (56.5) when compared to LANP (51.3, p=0.021 vs HANP, p=0.049 vs HAP) and LAP (51.3, p=0.005 vs HANP, p=0.004 vs HAP) groups .</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with high anxiety who undergo isolated ankle fracture fixation perform worse regarding PROMIS PI irrespective of PT status. However, some patients with high anxiety may benefit from formal PT referral to maximize their functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Prognostic.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal Physical Therapy Improves PROMIS PF for High Anxiety Patients Following Ankle ORIF.\",\"authors\":\"Willie Dong, Makoa Mau, Silvia Soule, Eleanor Sato, Tyler Thorne, Thomas Higgins, David Rothberg, Lucas Marchand, Justin Haller\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare outcomes after ankle fracture fixation between those receiving formal physical therapy (PT) vs. no formal PT and those with high vs. low PROMIS anxiety score (AS), and to evaluate the effect of PT in the setting of PROMIS AS scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients aged > 18 undergoing isolated ankle fracture (OTA/AO 44A, 44B, 44C) fixation with documented PROMIS scores postoperatively.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: The post-operative PROMIS physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) were compared between patients receiving formal PT vs. no PT and those with baseline high vs. low PROMIS AS scores. A sub-analysis was performed between patients with low anxiety and no PT (LANP) vs. low anxiety with PT (LAP) vs. high anxiety and no PT (HANP), and high anxiety with PT (HAP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 161 patients, 111 females (68.9%), with an average age of 46 years (range: 72), were included in this study: 127 PT, 34 no PT, 88 low anxiety, and 73 high anxiety. PT did not yield any significant differences in PROMIS PF (44.9 PT vs 42.6 no PT, p=0.180) or PI (53.5 PT vs 54.4 no PT, p=0.656) at final follow-up. At final follow-up, high anxiety patients had similar PROMIS PF (43.0) vs. low anxiety patients (45.5, p=0.088), but significantly worse PROMIS PI scores (51.5 vs. 56.7, respectively; p=0.001). Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant difference in age between high and low anxiety patients and was thus selected as a control variable in the analysis of HANP, HAP, LANP, and LAP. After controlling for age, pairwise comparisons of estimated PROMIS PF scores at final follow-up were significantly lower for HANP (39.0) than HAP (43.9, p=0.05), LANP (45.1, p=0.05), and LAP patients (45.9, p=0.04). Final PROMIS PI scores were significantly worse for HANP (59.1) and HAP (56.5) when compared to LANP (51.3, p=0.021 vs HANP, p=0.049 vs HAP) and LAP (51.3, p=0.005 vs HANP, p=0.004 vs HAP) groups .</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with high anxiety who undergo isolated ankle fracture fixation perform worse regarding PROMIS PI irrespective of PT status. However, some patients with high anxiety may benefit from formal PT referral to maximize their functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, Prognostic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002940\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002940","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较接受正规物理治疗(PT)与未接受正规物理治疗(PT)以及PROMIS焦虑评分(AS)高与低的患者踝关节骨折固定后的预后,并评价PT在PROMIS AS评分设置中的作用。方法:设计:回顾性队列研究。地点:一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:年龄在bb0 ~ 18岁的患者,接受孤立性踝关节骨折(OTA/ ao44a, 44B, 44C)固定,术后有记录的PROMIS评分。结果测量和比较:比较接受正式PT和未接受PT的患者以及基线PROMIS AS评分高和低的患者的术后PROMIS身体功能(PF)和疼痛干扰(PI)。对低焦虑无PT (LANP)、低焦虑伴PT (LAP)、高焦虑无PT (HANP)、高焦虑伴PT (HAP)患者进行亚分析。结果:共纳入161例患者,其中女性111例(68.9%),平均年龄46岁(范围:72岁),有焦虑127例,无焦虑34例,低焦虑88例,高焦虑73例。在最终随访时,PT组在PROMIS PF (44.9 PT vs 42.6 PT, p=0.180)或PI (53.5 PT vs 54.4 PT, p=0.656)方面没有任何显著差异。在最后的随访中,高焦虑患者的PROMIS PF(43.0)与低焦虑患者(45.5,p=0.088)相似,但PROMIS PI评分明显较差(分别为51.5比56.7;p = 0.001)。单因素分析显示高、低焦虑患者的年龄有显著差异,因此在HANP、HAP、LANP和LAP分析中选择年龄作为控制变量。在控制年龄后,HANP患者最终随访时PROMIS PF评分(39.0)的两两比较显著低于HAP患者(43.9,p=0.05)、LANP患者(45.1,p=0.05)和LAP患者(45.9,p=0.04)。与LANP组(51.3,p=0.021 vs HANP, p=0.049 vs HAP)和LAP组(51.3,p=0.005 vs HANP, p=0.004 vs HAP)相比,HANP组(59.1)和HAP组(56.5)的最终PROMIS PI评分明显较差。结论:接受孤立踝关节骨折固定的高焦虑患者在PROMIS PI方面的表现较差,与PT状态无关。然而,一些高焦虑患者可能受益于正式的PT转诊,以最大限度地提高其功能预后。证据等级:III级,预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Formal Physical Therapy Improves PROMIS PF for High Anxiety Patients Following Ankle ORIF.

Objective: To compare outcomes after ankle fracture fixation between those receiving formal physical therapy (PT) vs. no formal PT and those with high vs. low PROMIS anxiety score (AS), and to evaluate the effect of PT in the setting of PROMIS AS scores.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Level 1 trauma center.

Patient selection criteria: Patients aged > 18 undergoing isolated ankle fracture (OTA/AO 44A, 44B, 44C) fixation with documented PROMIS scores postoperatively.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: The post-operative PROMIS physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) were compared between patients receiving formal PT vs. no PT and those with baseline high vs. low PROMIS AS scores. A sub-analysis was performed between patients with low anxiety and no PT (LANP) vs. low anxiety with PT (LAP) vs. high anxiety and no PT (HANP), and high anxiety with PT (HAP).

Results: A total of 161 patients, 111 females (68.9%), with an average age of 46 years (range: 72), were included in this study: 127 PT, 34 no PT, 88 low anxiety, and 73 high anxiety. PT did not yield any significant differences in PROMIS PF (44.9 PT vs 42.6 no PT, p=0.180) or PI (53.5 PT vs 54.4 no PT, p=0.656) at final follow-up. At final follow-up, high anxiety patients had similar PROMIS PF (43.0) vs. low anxiety patients (45.5, p=0.088), but significantly worse PROMIS PI scores (51.5 vs. 56.7, respectively; p=0.001). Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant difference in age between high and low anxiety patients and was thus selected as a control variable in the analysis of HANP, HAP, LANP, and LAP. After controlling for age, pairwise comparisons of estimated PROMIS PF scores at final follow-up were significantly lower for HANP (39.0) than HAP (43.9, p=0.05), LANP (45.1, p=0.05), and LAP patients (45.9, p=0.04). Final PROMIS PI scores were significantly worse for HANP (59.1) and HAP (56.5) when compared to LANP (51.3, p=0.021 vs HANP, p=0.049 vs HAP) and LAP (51.3, p=0.005 vs HANP, p=0.004 vs HAP) groups .

Conclusion: Patients with high anxiety who undergo isolated ankle fracture fixation perform worse regarding PROMIS PI irrespective of PT status. However, some patients with high anxiety may benefit from formal PT referral to maximize their functional outcomes.

Level of evidence: Level III, Prognostic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
The Rapid Escalation of Fractures and Hospital Admissions from Electric Bicycle Injuries in the United States: An Analysis of National Injury Data from 2019 to 2023. Inability to Remove Locking Screws From the Femoral Neck System Due to Stripping of the Screwdriver Within the Locking Screw Head. Hardware Removal After Lisfranc Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Results in Improved Physical Function. Cast-OFF 2: One Week Versus 3-5 Weeks of Plaster Cast Immobilization for Non- or Minimally Displaced Distal Radius Fractures-A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. The Use of External Beam Radiation Therapy for Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Surgical Fixation of Acetabular Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1