{"title":"[种植体深度和扫描杆长度对下颌后牙单牙种植体修复数字印模精度的影响]。","authors":"S Sun, X Zheng, H Gan, R Tian, X Xie","doi":"10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.11.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the influence of implant depth and scanning rod lengths on the accuracy of digital impression for single-tooth implant restoration of the mandibular posterior teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five standard dental cast models with missing right mandibular first molar (46) were prepared with the subgingival implant depths of 0, 1, 3, 5 and 7 mm. ITI RC and ITI RC H11 scanning rods were connected to the replacement body and placed into the seating tract for scanning. The reference data were obtained using a 3D dental scanner, and the experimental data were obtained by 10 scans of each model using a digitized intraoral scanner. Geomagic Wrap 2021 was used to analyze the model data to test the trueness and precision of the models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trueness did not differ significantly among the groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The implant depth of 1 mm achieved the highest impression precision (66.81±2.45 μm), and the depth of 0 mm resulted in a significantly lower precision (95.60±3.04 μm) than the depth of 1 and 3 mm. Starting from the subgingival depth of 1 mm, the precision of the scan decreased progressively with the increase of the implant depth. At the subgingival implant depth of 5 or 7 mm, the use of an extended rod significantly improved the scan precision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For single-tooth implant restoration of the mandibular posterior teeth, the implant depth can substantially affect the accuracy of digital impression, which decreases as the implant depth increases. For a deep implant, the use of a longer scanning rod can improve the scanning accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18962,"journal":{"name":"南方医科大学学报杂志","volume":"44 11","pages":"2250-2255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Influence of implant depth and scanning rod length on accuracy of digital impression for mandibular posterior single-tooth implant restoration].\",\"authors\":\"S Sun, X Zheng, H Gan, R Tian, X Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.11.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the influence of implant depth and scanning rod lengths on the accuracy of digital impression for single-tooth implant restoration of the mandibular posterior teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five standard dental cast models with missing right mandibular first molar (46) were prepared with the subgingival implant depths of 0, 1, 3, 5 and 7 mm. ITI RC and ITI RC H11 scanning rods were connected to the replacement body and placed into the seating tract for scanning. The reference data were obtained using a 3D dental scanner, and the experimental data were obtained by 10 scans of each model using a digitized intraoral scanner. Geomagic Wrap 2021 was used to analyze the model data to test the trueness and precision of the models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trueness did not differ significantly among the groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The implant depth of 1 mm achieved the highest impression precision (66.81±2.45 μm), and the depth of 0 mm resulted in a significantly lower precision (95.60±3.04 μm) than the depth of 1 and 3 mm. Starting from the subgingival depth of 1 mm, the precision of the scan decreased progressively with the increase of the implant depth. At the subgingival implant depth of 5 or 7 mm, the use of an extended rod significantly improved the scan precision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For single-tooth implant restoration of the mandibular posterior teeth, the implant depth can substantially affect the accuracy of digital impression, which decreases as the implant depth increases. For a deep implant, the use of a longer scanning rod can improve the scanning accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"南方医科大学学报杂志\",\"volume\":\"44 11\",\"pages\":\"2250-2255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605206/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"南方医科大学学报杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.11.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"南方医科大学学报杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.11.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Influence of implant depth and scanning rod length on accuracy of digital impression for mandibular posterior single-tooth implant restoration].
Objective: To study the influence of implant depth and scanning rod lengths on the accuracy of digital impression for single-tooth implant restoration of the mandibular posterior teeth.
Methods: Five standard dental cast models with missing right mandibular first molar (46) were prepared with the subgingival implant depths of 0, 1, 3, 5 and 7 mm. ITI RC and ITI RC H11 scanning rods were connected to the replacement body and placed into the seating tract for scanning. The reference data were obtained using a 3D dental scanner, and the experimental data were obtained by 10 scans of each model using a digitized intraoral scanner. Geomagic Wrap 2021 was used to analyze the model data to test the trueness and precision of the models.
Results: The trueness did not differ significantly among the groups (P > 0.05). The implant depth of 1 mm achieved the highest impression precision (66.81±2.45 μm), and the depth of 0 mm resulted in a significantly lower precision (95.60±3.04 μm) than the depth of 1 and 3 mm. Starting from the subgingival depth of 1 mm, the precision of the scan decreased progressively with the increase of the implant depth. At the subgingival implant depth of 5 or 7 mm, the use of an extended rod significantly improved the scan precision.
Conclusion: For single-tooth implant restoration of the mandibular posterior teeth, the implant depth can substantially affect the accuracy of digital impression, which decreases as the implant depth increases. For a deep implant, the use of a longer scanning rod can improve the scanning accuracy.