{"title":"探索睡眠持续时间与自评健康之间关系的社会人口统计学调节因子。","authors":"Olatokunbo Osibogun","doi":"10.1007/s11325-024-03199-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the association of sleep duration with self-rated health (SRH) and if age, sex, and race/ethnicity modifies this association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional analysis of 396,455 adults who were aged ≥ 18 years in the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Sleep duration was categorized into three: short (< 7 h), normal (7-9 h; reference), and long (> 9 h). SRH was dichotomized into suboptimal (fair/poor; reference) and optimal (excellent/very good/good). Logistic regression models were employed to investigate the association and assess interactions of age, sex, and race/ethnicity with sleep duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Short (adjusted odds ratio: 0.70 [95% confidence interval 0.66-0.74]) and long (0.65 [0.58-0.73]) sleep duration was associated with decreased odds of optimal SRH. There was a significant interaction between age and sleep duration (p = 0.029). The association between short sleep duration and SRH was strongest in the youngest age (18-24; 0.59 [0.47-0.74]), while 35-44 (0.57 [0.39-0.82] had the strongest association for long sleep duration with SRH. No significant interactions were found for sex (p = 0.314) or race/ethnicity (p = 0.930).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short and long sleep duration are associated with decreased odds of optimal SRH among US adults. Prioritizing sleep hygiene across all ages may improve SRH.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":"29 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring sociodemographic moderators of the association between sleep duration and self-rated health.\",\"authors\":\"Olatokunbo Osibogun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11325-024-03199-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the association of sleep duration with self-rated health (SRH) and if age, sex, and race/ethnicity modifies this association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional analysis of 396,455 adults who were aged ≥ 18 years in the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Sleep duration was categorized into three: short (< 7 h), normal (7-9 h; reference), and long (> 9 h). SRH was dichotomized into suboptimal (fair/poor; reference) and optimal (excellent/very good/good). Logistic regression models were employed to investigate the association and assess interactions of age, sex, and race/ethnicity with sleep duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Short (adjusted odds ratio: 0.70 [95% confidence interval 0.66-0.74]) and long (0.65 [0.58-0.73]) sleep duration was associated with decreased odds of optimal SRH. There was a significant interaction between age and sleep duration (p = 0.029). The association between short sleep duration and SRH was strongest in the youngest age (18-24; 0.59 [0.47-0.74]), while 35-44 (0.57 [0.39-0.82] had the strongest association for long sleep duration with SRH. No significant interactions were found for sex (p = 0.314) or race/ethnicity (p = 0.930).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short and long sleep duration are associated with decreased odds of optimal SRH among US adults. Prioritizing sleep hygiene across all ages may improve SRH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep and Breathing\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep and Breathing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03199-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03199-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring sociodemographic moderators of the association between sleep duration and self-rated health.
Objective: This study examined the association of sleep duration with self-rated health (SRH) and if age, sex, and race/ethnicity modifies this association.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 396,455 adults who were aged ≥ 18 years in the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Sleep duration was categorized into three: short (< 7 h), normal (7-9 h; reference), and long (> 9 h). SRH was dichotomized into suboptimal (fair/poor; reference) and optimal (excellent/very good/good). Logistic regression models were employed to investigate the association and assess interactions of age, sex, and race/ethnicity with sleep duration.
Results: Short (adjusted odds ratio: 0.70 [95% confidence interval 0.66-0.74]) and long (0.65 [0.58-0.73]) sleep duration was associated with decreased odds of optimal SRH. There was a significant interaction between age and sleep duration (p = 0.029). The association between short sleep duration and SRH was strongest in the youngest age (18-24; 0.59 [0.47-0.74]), while 35-44 (0.57 [0.39-0.82] had the strongest association for long sleep duration with SRH. No significant interactions were found for sex (p = 0.314) or race/ethnicity (p = 0.930).
Conclusion: Short and long sleep duration are associated with decreased odds of optimal SRH among US adults. Prioritizing sleep hygiene across all ages may improve SRH.
期刊介绍：
The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep.
Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
