英夫利昔单抗生物类似药摄取的驱动因素:在国家风湿病登记中,新的生物类似药启动与切换的比较分析。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14410
Eric Thomas Roberts, Nick Bansback, Chien-Wen Tseng, Stephen Shiboski, Jing Li, Gabriela Schmajuk, Jinoos Yazdany
{"title":"英夫利昔单抗生物类似药摄取的驱动因素:在国家风湿病登记中,新的生物类似药启动与切换的比较分析。","authors":"Eric Thomas Roberts, Nick Bansback, Chien-Wen Tseng, Stephen Shiboski, Jing Li, Gabriela Schmajuk, Jinoos Yazdany","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the variability in new infliximab biosimilar starts as well as switching from bio-originator to biosimilar infliximab, across insurance payers and rheumatology practices nationally.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>Data came from Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness, a national registry with electronic health records from over 1100 US rheumatologists. Key outcomes include ever use of a biosimilar, date of initiation, and date of switching. Key variables of interest include insurance payer and practice.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>Secondary analysis of 37,560 patients aged ≥18 years administered infliximab (bio-originator or biosimilar) between April 2016 and September 2022 in Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness. We tested for differences in use of biosimilar infliximab by demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, and diagnosis using standard mean differences and multivariable modified Poisson regression. We used generalized estimating equations to assess the adjusted effect of insurance and year of initiation on new biosimilar starts. We analyzed variation in biosimilar switching by insurance, date of switch, and practice.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>A total of 8196 (21.8%) infliximab users ever used a biosimilar and use did not differ significantly by demographic or clinical characteristics. In 2022, uptake among new users was higher among those with Medicaid (55%; 95%CI 43%-68%) and private insurance (51%; 95%CI 46%-57%) compared to Medicare (36%; 95%CI 29%-43%). Few prevalent bio-originator infliximab users switched to a biosimilar, and switching was lowest among Medicare beneficiaries (7% vs. 14.2% in Medicaid and 16.9% among privately insured). In adjusted analyses, practice level differences explained 37% of variation among new biosimilar starts and 34% of variation among those switching to a biosimilar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore two critical areas for enhancing biosimilar infliximab usage: increasing switching among prevalent users and increasing uptake among Medicare beneficiaries initiating treatment. Significant variation in uptake across practices also suggests that local switching policies are likely key drivers of uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drivers of infliximab biosimilar uptake: A comparative analysis of new biosimilar initiations versus switching in a national rheumatology registry.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Thomas Roberts, Nick Bansback, Chien-Wen Tseng, Stephen Shiboski, Jing Li, Gabriela Schmajuk, Jinoos Yazdany\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.14410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the variability in new infliximab biosimilar starts as well as switching from bio-originator to biosimilar infliximab, across insurance payers and rheumatology practices nationally.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>Data came from Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness, a national registry with electronic health records from over 1100 US rheumatologists. Key outcomes include ever use of a biosimilar, date of initiation, and date of switching. Key variables of interest include insurance payer and practice.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>Secondary analysis of 37,560 patients aged ≥18 years administered infliximab (bio-originator or biosimilar) between April 2016 and September 2022 in Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness. We tested for differences in use of biosimilar infliximab by demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, and diagnosis using standard mean differences and multivariable modified Poisson regression. We used generalized estimating equations to assess the adjusted effect of insurance and year of initiation on new biosimilar starts. We analyzed variation in biosimilar switching by insurance, date of switch, and practice.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>A total of 8196 (21.8%) infliximab users ever used a biosimilar and use did not differ significantly by demographic or clinical characteristics. In 2022, uptake among new users was higher among those with Medicaid (55%; 95%CI 43%-68%) and private insurance (51%; 95%CI 46%-57%) compared to Medicare (36%; 95%CI 29%-43%). Few prevalent bio-originator infliximab users switched to a biosimilar, and switching was lowest among Medicare beneficiaries (7% vs. 14.2% in Medicaid and 16.9% among privately insured). In adjusted analyses, practice level differences explained 37% of variation among new biosimilar starts and 34% of variation among those switching to a biosimilar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore two critical areas for enhancing biosimilar infliximab usage: increasing switching among prevalent users and increasing uptake among Medicare beneficiaries initiating treatment. Significant variation in uptake across practices also suggests that local switching policies are likely key drivers of uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14410\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14410","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析新英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药启动以及从生物原药到英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药的转换在全国不同保险支付者和风湿病实践中的可变性。研究设置和设计:数据来自风湿病信息学有效性系统,这是一个包含1100多名美国风湿病学家电子健康记录的国家登记处。主要结果包括曾经使用过的生物仿制药、起始日期和转换日期。感兴趣的关键变量包括保险付款人和实践。数据来源和分析样本:2016年4月至2022年9月,在风湿病信息学系统中,对37,560名年龄≥18岁的患者进行了英夫利昔单抗(生物原药或生物类似药)的二次分析。我们使用标准均值差异和多变量修正泊松回归,通过人口统计学特征、社会经济地位和诊断来检验英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药使用的差异。我们使用广义估计方程来评估保险和启动年份对新生物仿制药启动的调整效应。我们分析了生物仿制药切换的变化,保险,切换日期和实践。主要发现:共有8196名(21.8%)英夫利昔单抗使用者使用过生物仿制药,使用情况在人口统计学或临床特征方面没有显著差异。2022年,新用户的使用率在医疗补助计划中更高(55%;95%可信区间(43%-68%)和私人保险(51%;95%可信区间为46%-57%),而医疗保险(36%;95%可信区间29% - -43%)。很少有流行的生物原药英夫利昔单抗使用者转而使用生物仿制药,而在医疗保险受益人中,这一比例最低(7%,而在医疗补助中为14.2%,在私人保险中为16.9%)。在调整后的分析中,实践水平的差异解释了新生物仿制药启动之间37%的差异和切换到生物仿制药的人群中34%的差异。结论:我们的研究结果强调了加强英夫利昔单抗生物仿制药使用的两个关键领域:增加流行用户的转换和增加开始治疗的医疗保险受益人的吸收。不同实践中吸收的显著差异也表明,当地转换政策可能是吸收的关键驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drivers of infliximab biosimilar uptake: A comparative analysis of new biosimilar initiations versus switching in a national rheumatology registry.

Objective: To analyze the variability in new infliximab biosimilar starts as well as switching from bio-originator to biosimilar infliximab, across insurance payers and rheumatology practices nationally.

Study setting and design: Data came from Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness, a national registry with electronic health records from over 1100 US rheumatologists. Key outcomes include ever use of a biosimilar, date of initiation, and date of switching. Key variables of interest include insurance payer and practice.

Data sources and analytic sample: Secondary analysis of 37,560 patients aged ≥18 years administered infliximab (bio-originator or biosimilar) between April 2016 and September 2022 in Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness. We tested for differences in use of biosimilar infliximab by demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, and diagnosis using standard mean differences and multivariable modified Poisson regression. We used generalized estimating equations to assess the adjusted effect of insurance and year of initiation on new biosimilar starts. We analyzed variation in biosimilar switching by insurance, date of switch, and practice.

Principal findings: A total of 8196 (21.8%) infliximab users ever used a biosimilar and use did not differ significantly by demographic or clinical characteristics. In 2022, uptake among new users was higher among those with Medicaid (55%; 95%CI 43%-68%) and private insurance (51%; 95%CI 46%-57%) compared to Medicare (36%; 95%CI 29%-43%). Few prevalent bio-originator infliximab users switched to a biosimilar, and switching was lowest among Medicare beneficiaries (7% vs. 14.2% in Medicaid and 16.9% among privately insured). In adjusted analyses, practice level differences explained 37% of variation among new biosimilar starts and 34% of variation among those switching to a biosimilar.

Conclusions: Our findings underscore two critical areas for enhancing biosimilar infliximab usage: increasing switching among prevalent users and increasing uptake among Medicare beneficiaries initiating treatment. Significant variation in uptake across practices also suggests that local switching policies are likely key drivers of uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Patient-Provider Race Concordance and Primary Care Suicide Risk Screening in the Veterans Health Administration. Recruitment and Retention of Rural Health Professionals in Minnesota. Identifying Barriers to Being Offered and Accepting a Telehealth Visit for Cancer Care: Unpacking the Multi-Levels of Documented Racial Disparities in Telehealth Use. Integrated health systems and medical care quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Addressing Staffing Shortages in Nursing Homes: Does Relaxing Training and Licensing Requirements Increase Nurse Aide Staffing?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1