Mehrak Amjadi, Mohammad Raouf Safari, Ramin Dini Torkamani, Mohammadsepehr Kheiri Manjili, Davoud Jamshidi, Fatemeh Sobhan, Soolmaz Heidari
{"title":"聚醚醚酮与二硅酸锂内冠修复下颌第一磨牙后疲劳抗力的比较研究。","authors":"Mehrak Amjadi, Mohammad Raouf Safari, Ramin Dini Torkamani, Mohammadsepehr Kheiri Manjili, Davoud Jamshidi, Fatemeh Sobhan, Soolmaz Heidari","doi":"10.1155/tswj/8648372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Objectives:</b> Contemporary dentistry focuses on more conservative treatment options such as endocrown restorations and application of dental materials with higher resemblance to tooth structure. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) polymer is a material used for the fabrication of endocrowns. This study aimed to compare the post-fatigue resistance (PFR) of mandibular first molars restored with PEEK and lithium disilicate (LS<sub>2</sub>) endocrown restorations. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 20 human mandibular first molars with similar dimensions. The teeth were prepared for endocrown restoration and were assigned to two groups (<i>n</i> = 10) of PEEK and LS<sub>2</sub> endocrowns. After fabrication by the computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technique, the restorations were cemented with resin cement. Next, the teeth underwent 15,000 thermal cycles followed by cyclic loading with 600,000 cycles of compressive force (100 N, 4 Hz) and were then subjected to compressive load application in a universal testing machine. The load causing endocrown failure was recorded as the PFR of the respective restoration. The failure mode was also inspected under a light microscope. Data were analyzed by the independent <i>t</i>-test and also chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Fisher's exact tests (<i>α</i> < 0.05). <b>Results:</b> The teeth with PEEK endocrowns showed significantly higher PFR than those with LS<sub>2</sub> endocrowns. Irreparable fractures were dominant in both groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> PEEK may serve as a suitable alternative to LS<sub>2</sub> for the fabrication of endocrown restorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22985,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific World Journal","volume":"2024 ","pages":"8648372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Assessment of Post-Fatigue Resistance of Mandibular First Molars Restored With Polyether Ether Ketone and Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns.\",\"authors\":\"Mehrak Amjadi, Mohammad Raouf Safari, Ramin Dini Torkamani, Mohammadsepehr Kheiri Manjili, Davoud Jamshidi, Fatemeh Sobhan, Soolmaz Heidari\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/tswj/8648372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and Objectives:</b> Contemporary dentistry focuses on more conservative treatment options such as endocrown restorations and application of dental materials with higher resemblance to tooth structure. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) polymer is a material used for the fabrication of endocrowns. This study aimed to compare the post-fatigue resistance (PFR) of mandibular first molars restored with PEEK and lithium disilicate (LS<sub>2</sub>) endocrown restorations. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 20 human mandibular first molars with similar dimensions. The teeth were prepared for endocrown restoration and were assigned to two groups (<i>n</i> = 10) of PEEK and LS<sub>2</sub> endocrowns. After fabrication by the computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technique, the restorations were cemented with resin cement. Next, the teeth underwent 15,000 thermal cycles followed by cyclic loading with 600,000 cycles of compressive force (100 N, 4 Hz) and were then subjected to compressive load application in a universal testing machine. The load causing endocrown failure was recorded as the PFR of the respective restoration. The failure mode was also inspected under a light microscope. Data were analyzed by the independent <i>t</i>-test and also chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Fisher's exact tests (<i>α</i> < 0.05). <b>Results:</b> The teeth with PEEK endocrowns showed significantly higher PFR than those with LS<sub>2</sub> endocrowns. Irreparable fractures were dominant in both groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> PEEK may serve as a suitable alternative to LS<sub>2</sub> for the fabrication of endocrown restorations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Scientific World Journal\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"8648372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617050/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Scientific World Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/8648372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific World Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/8648372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:当代牙科学关注于更为保守的治疗选择,如牙冠内修复和应用与牙齿结构相似度更高的牙科材料。聚醚醚酮(PEEK)聚合物是一种用于制造牙内冠的材料。本研究旨在比较聚醚醚酮(PEEK)和二硅酸锂(LS2)内冠修复下颌第一磨牙的疲劳后阻力(PFR)。材料与方法:对20颗尺寸相近的人下颌第一磨牙进行了体外实验研究。预备牙进行内冠修复,分为PEEK和LS2两组(n = 10)。通过计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)技术制作完成后,用树脂水泥胶结修复体。接下来,牙齿进行15,000次热循环,然后进行60万次压缩力循环加载(100 N, 4 Hz),然后在通用试验机中进行压缩载荷应用。导致内冠失效的负荷被记录为各自修复的PFR。在光镜下观察了其破坏模式。采用独立t检验、卡方检验、Mann-Whitney检验和Fisher精确检验(α)对数据进行分析。结果:PEEK内冠组的PFR明显高于LS2内冠组。两组均以不可修复性骨折为主。结论:PEEK可作为LS2的替代材料用于冠内修复体的制备。
Comparative Assessment of Post-Fatigue Resistance of Mandibular First Molars Restored With Polyether Ether Ketone and Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns.
Background and Objectives: Contemporary dentistry focuses on more conservative treatment options such as endocrown restorations and application of dental materials with higher resemblance to tooth structure. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) polymer is a material used for the fabrication of endocrowns. This study aimed to compare the post-fatigue resistance (PFR) of mandibular first molars restored with PEEK and lithium disilicate (LS2) endocrown restorations. Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 20 human mandibular first molars with similar dimensions. The teeth were prepared for endocrown restoration and were assigned to two groups (n = 10) of PEEK and LS2 endocrowns. After fabrication by the computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technique, the restorations were cemented with resin cement. Next, the teeth underwent 15,000 thermal cycles followed by cyclic loading with 600,000 cycles of compressive force (100 N, 4 Hz) and were then subjected to compressive load application in a universal testing machine. The load causing endocrown failure was recorded as the PFR of the respective restoration. The failure mode was also inspected under a light microscope. Data were analyzed by the independent t-test and also chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Fisher's exact tests (α < 0.05). Results: The teeth with PEEK endocrowns showed significantly higher PFR than those with LS2 endocrowns. Irreparable fractures were dominant in both groups. Conclusion: PEEK may serve as a suitable alternative to LS2 for the fabrication of endocrown restorations.
期刊介绍:
The Scientific World Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research, reviews, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in science, technology, and medicine. The journal is divided into 81 subject areas.