基于非线性混合效应模型的少时点时间积分活度系数计算:[111In] in - dota - tate在肾脏中的概念验证。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104865
Rizky Mahardhika Subangun, Deni Hardiansyah, Raushan Fikr Ilham Ibrahim, Bisma Barron Patrianesha, Nur Rahmah Hidayati, Ambros J Beer, Gerhard Glatting
{"title":"基于非线性混合效应模型的少时点时间积分活度系数计算:[111In] in - dota - tate在肾脏中的概念验证。","authors":"Rizky Mahardhika Subangun, Deni Hardiansyah, Raushan Fikr Ilham Ibrahim, Bisma Barron Patrianesha, Nur Rahmah Hidayati, Ambros J Beer, Gerhard Glatting","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of few-time-points (FTP) time-integrated activity coefficients (TIACs) in peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using non-linear mixed-effects (NLME) modeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Biokinetic data of [<sup>111</sup>In]In-DOTA-TATE in kidneys at T-1 = (2.9 ± 0.6) h, T-2 = (4.6 ± 0.4) h, T-3 = (22.8 ± 1.6) h, T-4 = (46.7 ± 1.7) h, and T-5 = (70.9 ± 1.0) h after injection were obtained from eight patients using planar imaging. The Sum-Of-Exponentials (SOE) function with four parameters was used, which was selected as the best model for the renal biokinetic data of [<sup>111</sup>In]In-DOTA-TATE. The parameters of the SOE function were fitted to the all-time-point data in the NLME framework to derive reference (rTIACs). FTP fits, which consist of all combinations of time points, are done to calculate the estimated TIACs (eTIACs). The accuracy of the FTP-NLME TIACs calculations was assessed by calculating the relative deviations (RDs) and relative root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) between the eTIACs and rTIACs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lowest (mean ± SD) of RDs for the single-, two-, three-, four-time point FTPs were (0 ± 8) % (T-4), (1 ± 6) % (T-3 and T-4), (3 ± 5) % (T-2, T-3 and T-4), and (0 ± 2) % (T-2, T-3, T-4, and T-5), respectively. The lowest RMSEs for the one-, two-, three-, and four-time point FTPs were 8 % (T-4), 6 % (T-3 and T-4), 5 % (T-2, T-3 and T-4), and 2 % (T-2, T-3, T-4, and T-5), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed that FTP-NLME in an example of [<sup>111</sup>In]In-DOTA-TATE could lead to a high accuracy of eTIAC across various time points, when incorporating time point T-4 = (46.7 ± 1.7) h.</p>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"129 ","pages":"104865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Few-time-points time-integrated activity coefficients calculation using non-linear mixed-effects modeling: Proof of concept for [<sup>111</sup>In]In-DOTA-TATE in kidneys.\",\"authors\":\"Rizky Mahardhika Subangun, Deni Hardiansyah, Raushan Fikr Ilham Ibrahim, Bisma Barron Patrianesha, Nur Rahmah Hidayati, Ambros J Beer, Gerhard Glatting\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of few-time-points (FTP) time-integrated activity coefficients (TIACs) in peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using non-linear mixed-effects (NLME) modeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Biokinetic data of [<sup>111</sup>In]In-DOTA-TATE in kidneys at T-1 = (2.9 ± 0.6) h, T-2 = (4.6 ± 0.4) h, T-3 = (22.8 ± 1.6) h, T-4 = (46.7 ± 1.7) h, and T-5 = (70.9 ± 1.0) h after injection were obtained from eight patients using planar imaging. The Sum-Of-Exponentials (SOE) function with four parameters was used, which was selected as the best model for the renal biokinetic data of [<sup>111</sup>In]In-DOTA-TATE. The parameters of the SOE function were fitted to the all-time-point data in the NLME framework to derive reference (rTIACs). FTP fits, which consist of all combinations of time points, are done to calculate the estimated TIACs (eTIACs). The accuracy of the FTP-NLME TIACs calculations was assessed by calculating the relative deviations (RDs) and relative root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) between the eTIACs and rTIACs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lowest (mean ± SD) of RDs for the single-, two-, three-, four-time point FTPs were (0 ± 8) % (T-4), (1 ± 6) % (T-3 and T-4), (3 ± 5) % (T-2, T-3 and T-4), and (0 ± 2) % (T-2, T-3, T-4, and T-5), respectively. The lowest RMSEs for the one-, two-, three-, and four-time point FTPs were 8 % (T-4), 6 % (T-3 and T-4), 5 % (T-2, T-3 and T-4), and 2 % (T-2, T-3, T-4, and T-5), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results showed that FTP-NLME in an example of [<sup>111</sup>In]In-DOTA-TATE could lead to a high accuracy of eTIAC across various time points, when incorporating time point T-4 = (46.7 ± 1.7) h.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"104865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104865\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104865","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是利用非线性混合效应(NLME)模型探讨肽受体放射性核素治疗(PRRT)中少时间点(FTP)时间积分活性系数(TIACs)的准确性。方法:采用平面显像法获取8例患者注射后T-1 =(2.9±0.6)h、T-2 =(4.6±0.4)h、T-3 =(22.8±1.6)h、T-4 =(46.7±1.7)h、T-5 =(70.9±1.0)h时[111In] in - dota - tate在肾脏内的生物动力学数据。采用带有4个参数的指数求和(SOE)函数,选择SOE作为[111In]In-DOTA-TATE肾脏生物动力学数据的最佳模型。将SOE函数的参数拟合到NLME框架中的所有时间点数据中,得到参考(rTIACs)。FTP匹配由时间点的所有组合组成,用于计算估计的TIACs (eTIACs)。通过计算eTIACs与rTIACs之间的相对偏差(rd)和相对均方根误差(rmse)来评估FTP-NLME TIACs计算的准确性。结果:单时间点、二时间点、三时间点、四时间点的最小RDs(平均±SD)分别为(0±8)% (T-4)、(1±6)% (T-3和T-4)、(3±5)% (T-2、T-3、T-4、T-5)和(0±2)%。1、2、3和4个时间点的最小rmse分别为8% (T-4)、6% (T-3和T-4)、5% (T-2、T-3和T-4)和2% (T-2、T-3、T-4和T-5)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,当纳入时间点T-4 =(46.7±1.7)h时,FTP-NLME在[111In] in - dota - tate的例子中可以在各个时间点上获得较高的eTIAC准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Few-time-points time-integrated activity coefficients calculation using non-linear mixed-effects modeling: Proof of concept for [111In]In-DOTA-TATE in kidneys.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of few-time-points (FTP) time-integrated activity coefficients (TIACs) in peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using non-linear mixed-effects (NLME) modeling.

Methods: Biokinetic data of [111In]In-DOTA-TATE in kidneys at T-1 = (2.9 ± 0.6) h, T-2 = (4.6 ± 0.4) h, T-3 = (22.8 ± 1.6) h, T-4 = (46.7 ± 1.7) h, and T-5 = (70.9 ± 1.0) h after injection were obtained from eight patients using planar imaging. The Sum-Of-Exponentials (SOE) function with four parameters was used, which was selected as the best model for the renal biokinetic data of [111In]In-DOTA-TATE. The parameters of the SOE function were fitted to the all-time-point data in the NLME framework to derive reference (rTIACs). FTP fits, which consist of all combinations of time points, are done to calculate the estimated TIACs (eTIACs). The accuracy of the FTP-NLME TIACs calculations was assessed by calculating the relative deviations (RDs) and relative root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) between the eTIACs and rTIACs.

Results: The lowest (mean ± SD) of RDs for the single-, two-, three-, four-time point FTPs were (0 ± 8) % (T-4), (1 ± 6) % (T-3 and T-4), (3 ± 5) % (T-2, T-3 and T-4), and (0 ± 2) % (T-2, T-3, T-4, and T-5), respectively. The lowest RMSEs for the one-, two-, three-, and four-time point FTPs were 8 % (T-4), 6 % (T-3 and T-4), 5 % (T-2, T-3 and T-4), and 2 % (T-2, T-3, T-4, and T-5), respectively.

Conclusion: Our results showed that FTP-NLME in an example of [111In]In-DOTA-TATE could lead to a high accuracy of eTIAC across various time points, when incorporating time point T-4 = (46.7 ± 1.7) h.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
期刊最新文献
Determining the optimal surface tracking area on the stereotactic mask in brain stereotactic radiosurgery using thermo-optical surface-guided radiotherapy. Development and validation of fully automated robust deep learning models for multi-organ segmentation from whole-body CT images. Evaluation of a modified formalism for precision electron beam dosimetry compared to TG-51 and TRS-398. Breast ultrasound imaging systems performance evaluation using novel Contrast-Detail (C-D) and Anechoic-Target (A-T) phantoms. Intrafraction motion in intra-cranial multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery plans: A multi-institutional investigation on robustness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1