联邦合格医疗中心患者对远程心理保健的偏好。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0458
Rebecca L Emery Tavernier, Celia Blaszkowsky, Abigail Jacobs, Peyton Rogers, Grace Wang
{"title":"联邦合格医疗中心患者对远程心理保健的偏好。","authors":"Rebecca L Emery Tavernier, Celia Blaszkowsky, Abigail Jacobs, Peyton Rogers, Grace Wang","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: This cross-sectional study evaluated whether preferences for attending mental health visits virtually or in-person vary by demographics and identified factors influencing these preferences among federally qualified health center (FQHC) patients. <b>Methods</b>: FQHC patients (<i>N</i> = 350) completed a satisfaction survey of their mental health care experiences in 2022. Demographic data were obtained from the electronic health record. Fisher's Exact tests were used to determine whether modality preferences (phone, video, or in-person) varied across demographic factors. Open-ended comments were qualitatively evaluated using an inductive approach to identify themes related to modality preferences. <b>Results</b>: Modality preferences varied by age and language (<i>p</i>'s <0.02) but not race and gender (<i>p</i>'s >0.36). Reasons for modality preferences fell within six themes: (1) convenience, (2) connection, (3) transportation/accessibility, (4) health concerns, (5) caretaking responsibilities, and (6) technology. <b>Conclusion</b>: These findings clarify the reasons FQHC patients prefer telemental health care and identify gaps in its usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Preferences for Telemental Health Care in a Federally Qualified Health Center.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca L Emery Tavernier, Celia Blaszkowsky, Abigail Jacobs, Peyton Rogers, Grace Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2024.0458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: This cross-sectional study evaluated whether preferences for attending mental health visits virtually or in-person vary by demographics and identified factors influencing these preferences among federally qualified health center (FQHC) patients. <b>Methods</b>: FQHC patients (<i>N</i> = 350) completed a satisfaction survey of their mental health care experiences in 2022. Demographic data were obtained from the electronic health record. Fisher's Exact tests were used to determine whether modality preferences (phone, video, or in-person) varied across demographic factors. Open-ended comments were qualitatively evaluated using an inductive approach to identify themes related to modality preferences. <b>Results</b>: Modality preferences varied by age and language (<i>p</i>'s <0.02) but not race and gender (<i>p</i>'s >0.36). Reasons for modality preferences fell within six themes: (1) convenience, (2) connection, (3) transportation/accessibility, (4) health concerns, (5) caretaking responsibilities, and (6) technology. <b>Conclusion</b>: These findings clarify the reasons FQHC patients prefer telemental health care and identify gaps in its usage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0458\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本横断面研究评估了在联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)患者中,参加虚拟或亲自精神卫生访问的偏好是否因人口统计学而异,并确定了影响这些偏好的因素。方法:FQHC患者(N = 350)于2022年完成心理健康服务满意度调查。人口统计数据来自电子健康记录。Fisher’s Exact测试用于确定人们对方式的偏好(电话、视频或面对面)是否因人口统计因素而异。使用归纳方法对开放式评论进行定性评估,以确定与情态偏好相关的主题。结果:情态偏好随年龄和语言的不同而不同(p's p's >0.36)。模式偏好的原因分为六个主题:(1)便利,(2)连接,(3)交通/可达性,(4)健康问题,(5)照顾责任,(6)技术。结论:这些发现阐明了FQHC患者偏好远程医疗的原因,并确定了远程医疗的使用差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient Preferences for Telemental Health Care in a Federally Qualified Health Center.

Objective: This cross-sectional study evaluated whether preferences for attending mental health visits virtually or in-person vary by demographics and identified factors influencing these preferences among federally qualified health center (FQHC) patients. Methods: FQHC patients (N = 350) completed a satisfaction survey of their mental health care experiences in 2022. Demographic data were obtained from the electronic health record. Fisher's Exact tests were used to determine whether modality preferences (phone, video, or in-person) varied across demographic factors. Open-ended comments were qualitatively evaluated using an inductive approach to identify themes related to modality preferences. Results: Modality preferences varied by age and language (p's <0.02) but not race and gender (p's >0.36). Reasons for modality preferences fell within six themes: (1) convenience, (2) connection, (3) transportation/accessibility, (4) health concerns, (5) caretaking responsibilities, and (6) technology. Conclusion: These findings clarify the reasons FQHC patients prefer telemental health care and identify gaps in its usage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
期刊最新文献
When Are Single Reader Evaluations Insufficient in Teledermoscopic Assessments? Analyses of a Retrospective Cohort Study. Same as It Ever Was. A Systematic Review of Telemedicine Solutions to Provide Psychological Interventions for Women Receiving Fertility Treatments. Experience of The National Emergency Tele-Critical Care Network. Post-Telemedicine Acute Care for Undifferentiated High-Acuity Conditions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1