提供动态细胞过程的物理描述的经验方法。

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS Biophysical journal Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.bpj.2024.12.003
Ian Seim, Stephan W Grill
{"title":"提供动态细胞过程的物理描述的经验方法。","authors":"Ian Seim, Stephan W Grill","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We review empirical methods that can be used to provide physical descriptions of dynamic cellular processes during development and disease. Our focus will be nonspatial descriptions and the inference of underlying interaction networks including cell-state lineages, gene regulatory networks, and molecular interactions in living cells. Our overarching questions are: How much can we learn from just observing? To what degree is it possible to infer causal and/or precise mathematical relationships from observations? We restrict ourselves to data sets arising from only observations, or experiments in which minimal perturbations have taken place to facilitate observation of the systems as they naturally occur. We discuss analysis perspectives in order from those offering the least descriptive power but requiring the least assumptions such as statistical associations. We end with those that are most descriptive, but require stricter assumptions and more previous knowledge of the systems such as causal inference and dynamical systems approaches. We hope to provide and encourage the use of a wide array of options for quantitative cell biologists to learn as much as possible from their observations at all stages of understanding of their system of interest. Finally, we provide our own recipe of how to empirically determine quantitative relationships and growth laws from live-cell microscopy data, the resultant predictions of which can then be verified with perturbation experiments. We also include an extended supplement that describes further inference algorithms and theory for the interested reader.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical methods that provide physical descriptions of dynamic cellular processes.\",\"authors\":\"Ian Seim, Stephan W Grill\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpj.2024.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We review empirical methods that can be used to provide physical descriptions of dynamic cellular processes during development and disease. Our focus will be nonspatial descriptions and the inference of underlying interaction networks including cell-state lineages, gene regulatory networks, and molecular interactions in living cells. Our overarching questions are: How much can we learn from just observing? To what degree is it possible to infer causal and/or precise mathematical relationships from observations? We restrict ourselves to data sets arising from only observations, or experiments in which minimal perturbations have taken place to facilitate observation of the systems as they naturally occur. We discuss analysis perspectives in order from those offering the least descriptive power but requiring the least assumptions such as statistical associations. We end with those that are most descriptive, but require stricter assumptions and more previous knowledge of the systems such as causal inference and dynamical systems approaches. We hope to provide and encourage the use of a wide array of options for quantitative cell biologists to learn as much as possible from their observations at all stages of understanding of their system of interest. Finally, we provide our own recipe of how to empirically determine quantitative relationships and growth laws from live-cell microscopy data, the resultant predictions of which can then be verified with perturbation experiments. We also include an extended supplement that describes further inference algorithms and theory for the interested reader.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.12.003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.12.003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们回顾了经验方法,可用于提供在发育和疾病期间动态细胞过程的物理描述。我们的重点将是非空间描述和潜在的相互作用网络的推断,包括细胞状态谱系、基因调控网络和活细胞中的分子相互作用。我们的首要问题是:我们能从观察中学到多少?在多大程度上可以从观察中推断出因果关系和/或精确的数学关系?我们将自己限制在仅由观测产生的数据集,或为了便于观察系统自然发生的情况而发生最小扰动的实验。我们讨论的分析观点,顺序从那些提供最少的描述性力量,但需要最少的假设,如统计关联。我们以那些最具描述性的方法结束,但需要更严格的假设和更多的系统先验知识,如因果推理和动力系统方法。我们希望为定量细胞生物学家提供并鼓励使用广泛的选择,以便在了解其感兴趣的系统的各个阶段从他们的观察中尽可能多地学习。最后,我们提供了我们自己的配方,如何从活细胞显微镜数据中经验地确定定量关系和生长规律,由此产生的预测可以通过扰动实验进行验证。我们还包括一个扩展的补充,其中描述了进一步的推理算法和理论为感兴趣的读者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empirical methods that provide physical descriptions of dynamic cellular processes.

We review empirical methods that can be used to provide physical descriptions of dynamic cellular processes during development and disease. Our focus will be nonspatial descriptions and the inference of underlying interaction networks including cell-state lineages, gene regulatory networks, and molecular interactions in living cells. Our overarching questions are: How much can we learn from just observing? To what degree is it possible to infer causal and/or precise mathematical relationships from observations? We restrict ourselves to data sets arising from only observations, or experiments in which minimal perturbations have taken place to facilitate observation of the systems as they naturally occur. We discuss analysis perspectives in order from those offering the least descriptive power but requiring the least assumptions such as statistical associations. We end with those that are most descriptive, but require stricter assumptions and more previous knowledge of the systems such as causal inference and dynamical systems approaches. We hope to provide and encourage the use of a wide array of options for quantitative cell biologists to learn as much as possible from their observations at all stages of understanding of their system of interest. Finally, we provide our own recipe of how to empirically determine quantitative relationships and growth laws from live-cell microscopy data, the resultant predictions of which can then be verified with perturbation experiments. We also include an extended supplement that describes further inference algorithms and theory for the interested reader.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biophysical journal
Biophysical journal 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3090
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.
期刊最新文献
Physical effects of crowdant size and concentration on collective microtubule polymerization. Transformer Graph Variational Autoencoder for Generative Molecular Design. Competing addition processes give distinct growth regimes in the assembly of 1D filaments. Synaptic cleft geometry modulates NMDAR opening probability by tuning neurotransmitter residence time. Adhesion-driven vesicle translocation through membrane-covered pores.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1