冷缺血时间和供者年龄对循环死亡肾移植后捐献结果的影响:一项UNOS配对肾分析。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1111/ctr.70051
Gabriel Cojuc-Konigsberg, Belen Rivera, Stalin Cañizares, Martha Pavlakis, Devin Eckhoff, Bhavna Chopra
{"title":"冷缺血时间和供者年龄对循环死亡肾移植后捐献结果的影响:一项UNOS配对肾分析。","authors":"Gabriel Cojuc-Konigsberg,&nbsp;Belen Rivera,&nbsp;Stalin Cañizares,&nbsp;Martha Pavlakis,&nbsp;Devin Eckhoff,&nbsp;Bhavna Chopra","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The association between prolonged cold ischemia times (CIT), donor age, and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from donors after circulatory death (DCD) remains uncertain. We aimed to compare allograft outcomes in DCD-donor KTRs according to CIT and age.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>UNOS database study (2010–2024) of DCD-donor KTRs on tacrolimus maintenance. We developed a mate-kidney analysis, comparing outcomes where one mate kidney had CIT &gt;24 and the other ≤24 h. We evaluated patient death, all-cause allograft failure, and death-censored graft failure (DCGF) using multivariable stratified Cox proportional hazards models. We compared outcomes across age groups (≥50 or &lt;50 years) and 6-h-period CIT deltas between mate kidneys. We assessed delayed graft function (DGF) occurrence with multivariable conditional logistic regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 4092 DCD-donor mate-kidney pairs. There were no differences between CIT &gt;24 versus ≤24 h in patient death (aHR 1.12, 95% CI 0.97–1.30), all-cause allograft failure (aHR 1.10, 95% CI 0.98–1.24), or DCGF (aHR 1.07, 95% CI 0.90–1.27). Similar results were observed when comparing outcomes by age group and 6-h-period CIT deltas between mate kidneys. Compared to shorter CITs, CITs &gt;24 h were associated with increased DGF likelihood (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.25–1.60), as were increasing CIT deltas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>CITs &gt;24 h in DCD-donor KTRs were not associated with adverse allograft outcomes, irrespective of age group. However, prolonged CITs were associated with increased DGF likelihood. Increasing the acceptance of both mate kidney from DCD donors should be considered despite projected CITs &gt;24 h.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Cold Ischemia Time and Donor Age on Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A UNOS Mate-Kidney Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Cojuc-Konigsberg,&nbsp;Belen Rivera,&nbsp;Stalin Cañizares,&nbsp;Martha Pavlakis,&nbsp;Devin Eckhoff,&nbsp;Bhavna Chopra\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The association between prolonged cold ischemia times (CIT), donor age, and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from donors after circulatory death (DCD) remains uncertain. We aimed to compare allograft outcomes in DCD-donor KTRs according to CIT and age.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>UNOS database study (2010–2024) of DCD-donor KTRs on tacrolimus maintenance. We developed a mate-kidney analysis, comparing outcomes where one mate kidney had CIT &gt;24 and the other ≤24 h. We evaluated patient death, all-cause allograft failure, and death-censored graft failure (DCGF) using multivariable stratified Cox proportional hazards models. We compared outcomes across age groups (≥50 or &lt;50 years) and 6-h-period CIT deltas between mate kidneys. We assessed delayed graft function (DGF) occurrence with multivariable conditional logistic regression.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 4092 DCD-donor mate-kidney pairs. There were no differences between CIT &gt;24 versus ≤24 h in patient death (aHR 1.12, 95% CI 0.97–1.30), all-cause allograft failure (aHR 1.10, 95% CI 0.98–1.24), or DCGF (aHR 1.07, 95% CI 0.90–1.27). Similar results were observed when comparing outcomes by age group and 6-h-period CIT deltas between mate kidneys. Compared to shorter CITs, CITs &gt;24 h were associated with increased DGF likelihood (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.25–1.60), as were increasing CIT deltas.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>CITs &gt;24 h in DCD-donor KTRs were not associated with adverse allograft outcomes, irrespective of age group. However, prolonged CITs were associated with increased DGF likelihood. Increasing the acceptance of both mate kidney from DCD donors should be considered despite projected CITs &gt;24 h.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"38 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:供体肾移植受者循环性死亡(DCD)后延长冷缺血时间(CIT)、供体年龄与预后之间的关系尚不确定。我们的目的是根据CIT和年龄比较cd供体KTRs的同种异体移植结果。方法:UNOS数据库(2010-2024)研究cd -供体ktr对他克莫司维持的影响。我们进行了配对肾脏分析,比较了一个配对肾脏CIT为bbbb24和另一个≤24小时的结果。我们使用多变量分层Cox比例风险模型评估了患者死亡、全因同种异体移植失败和死亡审查移植失败(DCGF)。我们比较了不同年龄组(≥50岁)的结果。结果:我们纳入了4092对cd供体配对肾脏。在患者死亡(aHR 1.12, 95% CI 0.97-1.30)、全因同种异体移植失败(aHR 1.10, 95% CI 0.98-1.24)或DCGF (aHR 1.07, 95% CI 0.90-1.27)方面,CIT 24小时与≤24小时之间没有差异。当按年龄组和配偶肾脏之间的6 h期CIT delta比较结果时,观察到类似的结果。与较短的CIT相比,CIT bbb24 h与DGF可能性增加相关(aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.25-1.60), CIT δ增加也是如此。结论:无论年龄如何,cd供体KTRs的CITs bbb24 h与同种异体移植的不良结果无关。然而,延长的CITs与DGF的可能性增加有关。尽管预计CITs为24小时,但仍应考虑增加DCD供者的双配偶肾的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Cold Ischemia Time and Donor Age on Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A UNOS Mate-Kidney Analysis

Background

The association between prolonged cold ischemia times (CIT), donor age, and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from donors after circulatory death (DCD) remains uncertain. We aimed to compare allograft outcomes in DCD-donor KTRs according to CIT and age.

Methods

UNOS database study (2010–2024) of DCD-donor KTRs on tacrolimus maintenance. We developed a mate-kidney analysis, comparing outcomes where one mate kidney had CIT >24 and the other ≤24 h. We evaluated patient death, all-cause allograft failure, and death-censored graft failure (DCGF) using multivariable stratified Cox proportional hazards models. We compared outcomes across age groups (≥50 or <50 years) and 6-h-period CIT deltas between mate kidneys. We assessed delayed graft function (DGF) occurrence with multivariable conditional logistic regression.

Results

We included 4092 DCD-donor mate-kidney pairs. There were no differences between CIT >24 versus ≤24 h in patient death (aHR 1.12, 95% CI 0.97–1.30), all-cause allograft failure (aHR 1.10, 95% CI 0.98–1.24), or DCGF (aHR 1.07, 95% CI 0.90–1.27). Similar results were observed when comparing outcomes by age group and 6-h-period CIT deltas between mate kidneys. Compared to shorter CITs, CITs >24 h were associated with increased DGF likelihood (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.25–1.60), as were increasing CIT deltas.

Conclusion

CITs >24 h in DCD-donor KTRs were not associated with adverse allograft outcomes, irrespective of age group. However, prolonged CITs were associated with increased DGF likelihood. Increasing the acceptance of both mate kidney from DCD donors should be considered despite projected CITs >24 h.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
Flying Kidneys or Flying Donors: What Do Prior Canadian Living Kidney Donors Think? Individual Association of Predicted Left and Right Ventricular Mass Ratios With Survival After Heart Transplantation: A UNOS Database Analysis Liver Transplant Fast-Track With an Emphasis on Reduced Delirium: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Reducing Length of Stay Hybrid Telemedicine and In-Person Care for Kidney Transplant Follow-Up: A Qualitative Study Is Survival Impacted by One or Several Successive Cancers After Liver Transplantation? A French National Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1