Joy W Chang, Sean S LaFata, Timothy S Gee, Walker D Redd, Trevor S Barlowe, Cary C Cotton, Swathi Eluri, Craig C Reed, Evan S Dellon
{"title":"PICK-UP-STRICS评分在内镜检查前预测EoE患者纤维狭窄的发展和验证。","authors":"Joy W Chang, Sean S LaFata, Timothy S Gee, Walker D Redd, Trevor S Barlowe, Cary C Cotton, Swathi Eluri, Craig C Reed, Evan S Dellon","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08777-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting fibrostenotic complications prior to endoscopy in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is challenging and esophageal strictures and narrowing are commonly missed on endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and validate a score to predict fibrostenosis in EoE patients prior to endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We leveraged a large database of newly diagnosed EoE patients. Fibrostenosis was defined as esophageal stricture, luminal narrowing, or dilation performed during the diagnostic endoscopy. Patients were randomly divided into a development and validation set. We compared features between patients with and without fibrostenosis to inform the initial model and assess predictive ability, as measured by area under curve (AUC). We tested the model in the independent validation set and generated a score to predict low, medium and high fibrostenosis risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 655 newly diagnosed EoE patients in the development set, fibrostenosis was associated with age ≥ 18 years (OR 10.64; 95% CI 5.61-20.17), symptoms for ≥ 5 years prior to diagnosis (OR 2.07; 1.32-3.24), dysphagia (OR 3.72; 1.68-8.22), food impaction (OR 1.68; 1.07-2.62), and lack of abdominal pain (OR 0.28; 0.14-0.60). The model predicted fibrostenosis (AUC = 0.841). In the validation set (n = 654), AUC was preserved (0.831). A scoring system was generated, with scores of ≤ 2 being low risk (< 10% chance of stricture), 2.5-4.5 medium risk (10-50% stricture), and 5-6 high risk (> 50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed and validated the PICK-UP-STRICS score to increase suspicion and detection of fibrostenotic disease in EoE using readily available clinical features prior to endoscopy. This score may guide clinical decisions on the need of endoscopic dilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"292-297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of the PICK-UP-STRICS Score to Predict Fibrostenosis in Patients with EoE Prior to Endoscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Joy W Chang, Sean S LaFata, Timothy S Gee, Walker D Redd, Trevor S Barlowe, Cary C Cotton, Swathi Eluri, Craig C Reed, Evan S Dellon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-024-08777-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting fibrostenotic complications prior to endoscopy in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is challenging and esophageal strictures and narrowing are commonly missed on endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and validate a score to predict fibrostenosis in EoE patients prior to endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We leveraged a large database of newly diagnosed EoE patients. Fibrostenosis was defined as esophageal stricture, luminal narrowing, or dilation performed during the diagnostic endoscopy. Patients were randomly divided into a development and validation set. We compared features between patients with and without fibrostenosis to inform the initial model and assess predictive ability, as measured by area under curve (AUC). We tested the model in the independent validation set and generated a score to predict low, medium and high fibrostenosis risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 655 newly diagnosed EoE patients in the development set, fibrostenosis was associated with age ≥ 18 years (OR 10.64; 95% CI 5.61-20.17), symptoms for ≥ 5 years prior to diagnosis (OR 2.07; 1.32-3.24), dysphagia (OR 3.72; 1.68-8.22), food impaction (OR 1.68; 1.07-2.62), and lack of abdominal pain (OR 0.28; 0.14-0.60). The model predicted fibrostenosis (AUC = 0.841). In the validation set (n = 654), AUC was preserved (0.831). A scoring system was generated, with scores of ≤ 2 being low risk (< 10% chance of stricture), 2.5-4.5 medium risk (10-50% stricture), and 5-6 high risk (> 50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed and validated the PICK-UP-STRICS score to increase suspicion and detection of fibrostenotic disease in EoE using readily available clinical features prior to endoscopy. This score may guide clinical decisions on the need of endoscopic dilation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"292-297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08777-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08777-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and Validation of the PICK-UP-STRICS Score to Predict Fibrostenosis in Patients with EoE Prior to Endoscopy.
Background: Predicting fibrostenotic complications prior to endoscopy in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is challenging and esophageal strictures and narrowing are commonly missed on endoscopy.
Aim: To develop and validate a score to predict fibrostenosis in EoE patients prior to endoscopy.
Methods: We leveraged a large database of newly diagnosed EoE patients. Fibrostenosis was defined as esophageal stricture, luminal narrowing, or dilation performed during the diagnostic endoscopy. Patients were randomly divided into a development and validation set. We compared features between patients with and without fibrostenosis to inform the initial model and assess predictive ability, as measured by area under curve (AUC). We tested the model in the independent validation set and generated a score to predict low, medium and high fibrostenosis risk.
Results: In 655 newly diagnosed EoE patients in the development set, fibrostenosis was associated with age ≥ 18 years (OR 10.64; 95% CI 5.61-20.17), symptoms for ≥ 5 years prior to diagnosis (OR 2.07; 1.32-3.24), dysphagia (OR 3.72; 1.68-8.22), food impaction (OR 1.68; 1.07-2.62), and lack of abdominal pain (OR 0.28; 0.14-0.60). The model predicted fibrostenosis (AUC = 0.841). In the validation set (n = 654), AUC was preserved (0.831). A scoring system was generated, with scores of ≤ 2 being low risk (< 10% chance of stricture), 2.5-4.5 medium risk (10-50% stricture), and 5-6 high risk (> 50%).
Conclusions: We developed and validated the PICK-UP-STRICS score to increase suspicion and detection of fibrostenotic disease in EoE using readily available clinical features prior to endoscopy. This score may guide clinical decisions on the need of endoscopic dilation.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.