纳洛酮的使用和阿片类药物和兴奋剂过量的生存:对宾夕法尼亚州63个县执法数据的分析。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104678
Manuel Cano , Abenaa Jones , Sydney M. Silverstein , Raminta Daniulaityte , Frank LoVecchio
{"title":"纳洛酮的使用和阿片类药物和兴奋剂过量的生存:对宾夕法尼亚州63个县执法数据的分析。","authors":"Manuel Cano ,&nbsp;Abenaa Jones ,&nbsp;Sydney M. Silverstein ,&nbsp;Raminta Daniulaityte ,&nbsp;Frank LoVecchio","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In consideration of rising opioid-stimulant deaths in the United States, this study explored rates of naloxone administration and survival in suspected opioid overdoses with, versus without, stimulants co-involved.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study analyzed 26,635 suspected opioid-involved overdoses recorded by law enforcement/first-responders in the Pennsylvania Overdose Information Network in 63 Pennsylvania counties, January 2018–July 2024. All measures, including suspected drug involvement, were based on first-responder assessment/report. Relative frequencies and chi-square tests were first used to compare suspected opioid overdoses with, versus without, stimulants (cocaine or methamphetamine) co-involved. Next, mediation analyses tested naloxone administration as a mediator in the association between stimulant co-involvement (in opioid overdoses) and survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Naloxone was reportedly administered in 72.2 % of the suspected opioid-no-cocaine overdoses, compared to 55.1 % of the opioid-cocaine-involved overdoses, and 72.1 % of the opioid-no-methamphetamine overdoses vs. 52.4 % of the opioid-methamphetamine-involved overdoses. With respect to survival rates, 18.0 % of the suspected opioid-no-cocaine overdoses ended in death, compared to 41.3 % of the opioid-cocaine overdoses; 18.1 % of the opioid-no-methamphetamine overdoses ended in death, versus 42.9 % of the opioid-methamphetamine overdoses. In mediation analyses (adjusted for demographics, county, year, and other drug co-involvement), naloxone administration mediated 38.7 % (95 % Confidence Interval [CI], 31.3–46.0 %) of the association between suspected cocaine co-involvement and survival and 39.2 % (95 % CI, 31.3–47.1 %) of the association between suspected methamphetamine co-involvement and survival.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among suspected opioid overdoses recorded in the Pennsylvania Overdose Information Network, stimulant co-involvement was associated with lower naloxone administration and higher fatality, with naloxone partially mediating the association between stimulant co-involvement and death.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 104678"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Naloxone administration and survival in overdoses involving opioids and stimulants: An analysis of law enforcement data from 63 Pennsylvania counties\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Cano ,&nbsp;Abenaa Jones ,&nbsp;Sydney M. Silverstein ,&nbsp;Raminta Daniulaityte ,&nbsp;Frank LoVecchio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In consideration of rising opioid-stimulant deaths in the United States, this study explored rates of naloxone administration and survival in suspected opioid overdoses with, versus without, stimulants co-involved.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study analyzed 26,635 suspected opioid-involved overdoses recorded by law enforcement/first-responders in the Pennsylvania Overdose Information Network in 63 Pennsylvania counties, January 2018–July 2024. All measures, including suspected drug involvement, were based on first-responder assessment/report. Relative frequencies and chi-square tests were first used to compare suspected opioid overdoses with, versus without, stimulants (cocaine or methamphetamine) co-involved. Next, mediation analyses tested naloxone administration as a mediator in the association between stimulant co-involvement (in opioid overdoses) and survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Naloxone was reportedly administered in 72.2 % of the suspected opioid-no-cocaine overdoses, compared to 55.1 % of the opioid-cocaine-involved overdoses, and 72.1 % of the opioid-no-methamphetamine overdoses vs. 52.4 % of the opioid-methamphetamine-involved overdoses. With respect to survival rates, 18.0 % of the suspected opioid-no-cocaine overdoses ended in death, compared to 41.3 % of the opioid-cocaine overdoses; 18.1 % of the opioid-no-methamphetamine overdoses ended in death, versus 42.9 % of the opioid-methamphetamine overdoses. In mediation analyses (adjusted for demographics, county, year, and other drug co-involvement), naloxone administration mediated 38.7 % (95 % Confidence Interval [CI], 31.3–46.0 %) of the association between suspected cocaine co-involvement and survival and 39.2 % (95 % CI, 31.3–47.1 %) of the association between suspected methamphetamine co-involvement and survival.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among suspected opioid overdoses recorded in the Pennsylvania Overdose Information Network, stimulant co-involvement was associated with lower naloxone administration and higher fatality, with naloxone partially mediating the association between stimulant co-involvement and death.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104678\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924003621\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924003621","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:考虑到美国阿片类兴奋剂死亡人数的上升,本研究探讨了纳洛酮给药率和疑似阿片类药物过量患者的生存率,其中兴奋剂与非兴奋剂有共同作用。方法:该研究分析了2018年1月至2024年7月宾夕法尼亚州63个县的执法/急救人员在宾夕法尼亚州过量信息网络中记录的26,635例疑似阿片类药物过量。所有措施,包括涉嫌吸毒,都是基于第一反应者的评估/报告。首先使用相对频率和卡方检验来比较疑似阿片类药物过量与非兴奋剂(可卡因或甲基苯丙胺)的共同作用。接下来,中介分析测试了纳洛酮作为兴奋剂共同参与(阿片类药物过量)和生存之间关联的中介。结果:据报道,72.2%的疑似阿片类-无可卡因过量患者使用纳洛酮,而阿片类-可卡因过量患者使用纳洛酮的比例为55.1%;72.1%的阿片类-无甲基苯丙胺过量患者使用纳洛酮,而阿片类-无甲基苯丙胺过量患者使用纳洛酮的比例为52.4%。在存活率方面,18.0%的疑似非阿片类可卡因过量者最终死亡,而在阿片类可卡因过量者中,这一比例为41.3%;18.1%的阿片类药物-非甲基苯丙胺过量者死亡,而42.9%的阿片类药物-甲基苯丙胺过量者死亡。在中介分析中(根据人口统计学、县、年份和其他药物共涉进行调整),纳洛酮介导38.7%(95%可信区间[CI], 31.3- 46.0%)的疑似可卡因共涉与生存之间的关联,以及39.2% (95% CI, 31.3- 47.1%)的疑似甲基苯丙胺共涉与生存之间的关联。结论:在宾夕法尼亚过量信息网络记录的疑似阿片类药物过量中,兴奋剂共参与与纳洛酮的使用减少和死亡率升高有关,纳洛酮部分介导了兴奋剂共参与与死亡之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Naloxone administration and survival in overdoses involving opioids and stimulants: An analysis of law enforcement data from 63 Pennsylvania counties

Background

In consideration of rising opioid-stimulant deaths in the United States, this study explored rates of naloxone administration and survival in suspected opioid overdoses with, versus without, stimulants co-involved.

Methods

The study analyzed 26,635 suspected opioid-involved overdoses recorded by law enforcement/first-responders in the Pennsylvania Overdose Information Network in 63 Pennsylvania counties, January 2018–July 2024. All measures, including suspected drug involvement, were based on first-responder assessment/report. Relative frequencies and chi-square tests were first used to compare suspected opioid overdoses with, versus without, stimulants (cocaine or methamphetamine) co-involved. Next, mediation analyses tested naloxone administration as a mediator in the association between stimulant co-involvement (in opioid overdoses) and survival.

Results

Naloxone was reportedly administered in 72.2 % of the suspected opioid-no-cocaine overdoses, compared to 55.1 % of the opioid-cocaine-involved overdoses, and 72.1 % of the opioid-no-methamphetamine overdoses vs. 52.4 % of the opioid-methamphetamine-involved overdoses. With respect to survival rates, 18.0 % of the suspected opioid-no-cocaine overdoses ended in death, compared to 41.3 % of the opioid-cocaine overdoses; 18.1 % of the opioid-no-methamphetamine overdoses ended in death, versus 42.9 % of the opioid-methamphetamine overdoses. In mediation analyses (adjusted for demographics, county, year, and other drug co-involvement), naloxone administration mediated 38.7 % (95 % Confidence Interval [CI], 31.3–46.0 %) of the association between suspected cocaine co-involvement and survival and 39.2 % (95 % CI, 31.3–47.1 %) of the association between suspected methamphetamine co-involvement and survival.

Conclusions

Among suspected opioid overdoses recorded in the Pennsylvania Overdose Information Network, stimulant co-involvement was associated with lower naloxone administration and higher fatality, with naloxone partially mediating the association between stimulant co-involvement and death.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Prescribing methadone in prison predicts linkage to HIV care after release from prison: A randomized and patient preference trial Is the affordability of cigarettes associated with the prevalence of smoking and quitting at the regional level in Russia? Safer supply programs: Discussions on medication diversion, sharing, and selling. Ethical justifications for safe supply interventions. Evaluating the association between cannabis decriminalization and legalization and cannabis arrests and related disparities: A Systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1