分析影响乘车服务采用的因素的异质性:逐步LCCA-MCDM建模方法

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Pub Date : 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1007/s11116-024-10563-9
Eeshan Bhaduri, Shagufta Pal, Arkopal Kishore Goswami
{"title":"分析影响乘车服务采用的因素的异质性:逐步LCCA-MCDM建模方法","authors":"Eeshan Bhaduri, Shagufta Pal, Arkopal Kishore Goswami","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10563-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study investigates the latent heterogeneity in travel behaviour among urban travellers, including ride-hailing service (RHS) users and <i>non</i>-users, by incorporating attitudes so as to reinforce conventional user-segmentation approaches. Simultaneously, prioritisation of ride-hailing specific attributes was carried out to assess how RHS will operate in a sustainable way. The study initially examines latent heterogeneity in travellers through a Latent Class Cluster Analysis (LCCA) model. Subsequently, it prioritises key RHS-specific attributes for each cluster using three established Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques. Three clusters were identified based on individuals’ attitudes and covariates (socio-demographics, travel habits, and built environment attributes). The largest cluster is the <i>Tech-savvy ride-hailing-ready individuals</i> (48%) with higher technological literacy, showing maximum acceptance towards ride-hailing. The second largest cluster comprises the <i>Traditional active-mobility individuals</i> (28%) who display the least proclivity towards RHS, probably due to their technological inhibition coupled with greater attachment to traditional travel alternatives. Lastly, the <i>PV-loving multimodal individuals</i> (24%) are primarily vehicle owners but prefer RHS for occasional trips. The final ranking obtained from the analysis has revealed that travel time, reliability, and flexibility are the <i>motivators</i>, while travel cost and waiting time are the <i>deterrents</i>, as perceived by the users, that influence RHS in the Indian context.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing heterogeneity in factors affecting adoption of ride-hailing services: a stepwise LCCA-MCDM modelling approach\",\"authors\":\"Eeshan Bhaduri, Shagufta Pal, Arkopal Kishore Goswami\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11116-024-10563-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The study investigates the latent heterogeneity in travel behaviour among urban travellers, including ride-hailing service (RHS) users and <i>non</i>-users, by incorporating attitudes so as to reinforce conventional user-segmentation approaches. Simultaneously, prioritisation of ride-hailing specific attributes was carried out to assess how RHS will operate in a sustainable way. The study initially examines latent heterogeneity in travellers through a Latent Class Cluster Analysis (LCCA) model. Subsequently, it prioritises key RHS-specific attributes for each cluster using three established Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques. Three clusters were identified based on individuals’ attitudes and covariates (socio-demographics, travel habits, and built environment attributes). The largest cluster is the <i>Tech-savvy ride-hailing-ready individuals</i> (48%) with higher technological literacy, showing maximum acceptance towards ride-hailing. The second largest cluster comprises the <i>Traditional active-mobility individuals</i> (28%) who display the least proclivity towards RHS, probably due to their technological inhibition coupled with greater attachment to traditional travel alternatives. Lastly, the <i>PV-loving multimodal individuals</i> (24%) are primarily vehicle owners but prefer RHS for occasional trips. The final ranking obtained from the analysis has revealed that travel time, reliability, and flexibility are the <i>motivators</i>, while travel cost and waiting time are the <i>deterrents</i>, as perceived by the users, that influence RHS in the Indian context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10563-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10563-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究调查了城市旅行者(包括网约车服务(RHS)用户和非用户)旅行行为的潜在异质性,通过纳入态度来加强传统的用户细分方法。同时,对网约车的特定属性进行了优先排序,以评估RHS将如何以可持续的方式运作。该研究最初通过潜在类聚类分析(LCCA)模型检验了旅行者的潜在异质性。随后,它使用三种已建立的多标准决策(MCDM)技术对每个集群的关键rhs特定属性进行优先级排序。根据个人态度和协变量(社会人口统计学、旅行习惯和建筑环境属性)确定了三个集群。最大的群体是精通技术、准备使用网约车的个人(48%),他们的技术素养较高,对网约车的接受程度最高。第二大群体包括传统主动出行的个人(28%),他们对RHS的倾向最低,这可能是由于他们对技术的抑制以及对传统出行方式的更大依赖。最后,喜欢pv的多式联运个人(24%)主要是车主,但偶尔出行时更喜欢RHS。从分析中得出的最终排名显示,在印度,出行时间、可靠性和灵活性是影响RHS的因素,而出行成本和等待时间则是用户认为的阻碍因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysing heterogeneity in factors affecting adoption of ride-hailing services: a stepwise LCCA-MCDM modelling approach

The study investigates the latent heterogeneity in travel behaviour among urban travellers, including ride-hailing service (RHS) users and non-users, by incorporating attitudes so as to reinforce conventional user-segmentation approaches. Simultaneously, prioritisation of ride-hailing specific attributes was carried out to assess how RHS will operate in a sustainable way. The study initially examines latent heterogeneity in travellers through a Latent Class Cluster Analysis (LCCA) model. Subsequently, it prioritises key RHS-specific attributes for each cluster using three established Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques. Three clusters were identified based on individuals’ attitudes and covariates (socio-demographics, travel habits, and built environment attributes). The largest cluster is the Tech-savvy ride-hailing-ready individuals (48%) with higher technological literacy, showing maximum acceptance towards ride-hailing. The second largest cluster comprises the Traditional active-mobility individuals (28%) who display the least proclivity towards RHS, probably due to their technological inhibition coupled with greater attachment to traditional travel alternatives. Lastly, the PV-loving multimodal individuals (24%) are primarily vehicle owners but prefer RHS for occasional trips. The final ranking obtained from the analysis has revealed that travel time, reliability, and flexibility are the motivators, while travel cost and waiting time are the deterrents, as perceived by the users, that influence RHS in the Indian context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
期刊最新文献
Identification and investigation of cruising speeds from cycling GPS data Beyond metros: pollution mitigation and environmental benefits in diverse transit systems Pffm-se: a passenger flow forecasting model for urban rail transit based on multimodal fusion of AFC and social media sentiment under special events Calibration of vehicular traffic simulation models by local optimization Agent-based modelling of older adult needs for autonomous mobility-on-demand: a case study in Winnipeg, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1