东北黑土区保护性耕作与常规耕作适宜性评价的六点实地研究

Fahui Jiang, Xinhua Peng, Shuihong Yao, Mahbub Ul Islam, Zhongbin Zhang, Baoyu Chen, Yuxian Wang, Nan Wang, Hua Qi, Zhengyu Wang, Xiangwei Gong, Xinwei Xue, Fansheng Meng
{"title":"东北黑土区保护性耕作与常规耕作适宜性评价的六点实地研究","authors":"Fahui Jiang, Xinhua Peng, Shuihong Yao, Mahbub Ul Islam, Zhongbin Zhang, Baoyu Chen, Yuxian Wang, Nan Wang, Hua Qi, Zhengyu Wang, Xiangwei Gong, Xinwei Xue, Fansheng Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2024.106379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Northeast China’s primary granary, long-term conventional tillage (CT) has led to significant soil degradation in the high-fertility black soil. Conservation tillage (CS) presents an opportunity to preserve soil quality but may reduce crop yield. The suitability of CT and CS in black soil regions and underlying mechanisms are not clear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of CT and CS on soil quality, crop yield and associated influencing factors at a regional scale. A comprehensive field experiment spanning six sites across the black soil region was conducted to evaluate the effects of rotary tillage (RT, traditional practice), no-tillage (NT, a form of CS), and deep ploughing (DP, representing CT) on maize yield and soil physicochemical properties. Results revealed that NT significantly enhanced total and available soil nutrients, along with soil organic carbon (SOC) content in surface layer (0–20 cm), compared to RT. Conversely, DP improved these soil properties in the subsurface layer (20–40 cm) across various sites. Notably, SOC accumulation rates were higher in warmer than cooler regions under NT. NT also significantly increased soil water content throughout the entire growth season and subsequently decreased soil temperature during the seeding stage, particularly in semi-arid areas. DP slightly increased soil water content and maintained a similar soil temperature compared to RT in both semi-arid and semi-humid areas. Variable partitioning analysis (VPA) highlighted the significant influence of soil bulk density, nutrient contents, and hydrothermal properties on yield variation under NT and DP compared to RT. Under NT, these factors contributed to 77 %, 81 %, and 63 % of yield variation, respectively, while for DP, the contributions were 65 %, −33 %, and 70 %. Our findings suggest that NT effectively preserves soil quality, conserves water, and sequesters carbon in semi-arid areas, leading to optimal maize production. Alternatively, DP with straw incorporation shows more variable yields and promises more positive outcomes in semi-humid areas.","PeriodicalId":501007,"journal":{"name":"Soil and Tillage Research","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A six-site field study on assessing the suitability of conservation and conventional tillage in the black soil region, Northeast China\",\"authors\":\"Fahui Jiang, Xinhua Peng, Shuihong Yao, Mahbub Ul Islam, Zhongbin Zhang, Baoyu Chen, Yuxian Wang, Nan Wang, Hua Qi, Zhengyu Wang, Xiangwei Gong, Xinwei Xue, Fansheng Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2024.106379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Northeast China’s primary granary, long-term conventional tillage (CT) has led to significant soil degradation in the high-fertility black soil. Conservation tillage (CS) presents an opportunity to preserve soil quality but may reduce crop yield. The suitability of CT and CS in black soil regions and underlying mechanisms are not clear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of CT and CS on soil quality, crop yield and associated influencing factors at a regional scale. A comprehensive field experiment spanning six sites across the black soil region was conducted to evaluate the effects of rotary tillage (RT, traditional practice), no-tillage (NT, a form of CS), and deep ploughing (DP, representing CT) on maize yield and soil physicochemical properties. Results revealed that NT significantly enhanced total and available soil nutrients, along with soil organic carbon (SOC) content in surface layer (0–20 cm), compared to RT. Conversely, DP improved these soil properties in the subsurface layer (20–40 cm) across various sites. Notably, SOC accumulation rates were higher in warmer than cooler regions under NT. NT also significantly increased soil water content throughout the entire growth season and subsequently decreased soil temperature during the seeding stage, particularly in semi-arid areas. DP slightly increased soil water content and maintained a similar soil temperature compared to RT in both semi-arid and semi-humid areas. Variable partitioning analysis (VPA) highlighted the significant influence of soil bulk density, nutrient contents, and hydrothermal properties on yield variation under NT and DP compared to RT. Under NT, these factors contributed to 77 %, 81 %, and 63 % of yield variation, respectively, while for DP, the contributions were 65 %, −33 %, and 70 %. Our findings suggest that NT effectively preserves soil quality, conserves water, and sequesters carbon in semi-arid areas, leading to optimal maize production. Alternatively, DP with straw incorporation shows more variable yields and promises more positive outcomes in semi-humid areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil and Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil and Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2024.106379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil and Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2024.106379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在东北初级粮仓,长期常规耕作导致高肥力黑土土壤明显退化。保护性耕作(CS)提供了保持土壤质量的机会,但可能会降低作物产量。CT和CS在黑土地区的适宜性及其机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在研究在区域尺度上CT和CS对土壤质量、作物产量及相关影响因素的影响。在黑土区6个试验点进行了综合田间试验,评估了传统轮作(RT)、免耕(NT, CS的一种形式)和深耕(DP,代表CT)对玉米产量和土壤理化性质的影响。结果表明,与rt相比,NT显著提高了表层(0 ~ 20 cm)土壤总养分和速效养分,以及土壤有机碳(SOC)含量。相反,DP改善了不同地点表层(20 ~ 40 cm)土壤的这些特性。土壤有机碳积累速率在暖区显著高于冷区。在整个生长季,土壤含水量显著增加,苗期土壤温度显著降低,尤其是在半干旱区。在半干旱和半湿润地区,与RT相比,DP略微增加了土壤含水量,保持了相似的土壤温度。变量分配分析(VPA)显示,土壤容重、养分含量和水热特性对NT和DP下产量变化的影响显著。在NT下,这些因素对产量变化的贡献率分别为77 %、81 %和63 %,而DP的贡献率分别为65 %、- 33 %和70 %。我们的研究结果表明,在半干旱地区,NT有效地保持了土壤质量,保持了水,并固碳,从而实现了最佳的玉米产量。另外,秸秆还田的DP在半湿润地区表现出更多的可变产量,并有望取得更积极的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A six-site field study on assessing the suitability of conservation and conventional tillage in the black soil region, Northeast China
In Northeast China’s primary granary, long-term conventional tillage (CT) has led to significant soil degradation in the high-fertility black soil. Conservation tillage (CS) presents an opportunity to preserve soil quality but may reduce crop yield. The suitability of CT and CS in black soil regions and underlying mechanisms are not clear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of CT and CS on soil quality, crop yield and associated influencing factors at a regional scale. A comprehensive field experiment spanning six sites across the black soil region was conducted to evaluate the effects of rotary tillage (RT, traditional practice), no-tillage (NT, a form of CS), and deep ploughing (DP, representing CT) on maize yield and soil physicochemical properties. Results revealed that NT significantly enhanced total and available soil nutrients, along with soil organic carbon (SOC) content in surface layer (0–20 cm), compared to RT. Conversely, DP improved these soil properties in the subsurface layer (20–40 cm) across various sites. Notably, SOC accumulation rates were higher in warmer than cooler regions under NT. NT also significantly increased soil water content throughout the entire growth season and subsequently decreased soil temperature during the seeding stage, particularly in semi-arid areas. DP slightly increased soil water content and maintained a similar soil temperature compared to RT in both semi-arid and semi-humid areas. Variable partitioning analysis (VPA) highlighted the significant influence of soil bulk density, nutrient contents, and hydrothermal properties on yield variation under NT and DP compared to RT. Under NT, these factors contributed to 77 %, 81 %, and 63 % of yield variation, respectively, while for DP, the contributions were 65 %, −33 %, and 70 %. Our findings suggest that NT effectively preserves soil quality, conserves water, and sequesters carbon in semi-arid areas, leading to optimal maize production. Alternatively, DP with straw incorporation shows more variable yields and promises more positive outcomes in semi-humid areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conservation agriculture boosts topsoil organic matter by restoring free lipids and lignin phenols biomarkers in distinct fractions Mechanisms of cover crop-derived carbon sequestration in winter wheat fields: Insights from 13C labeling Nitrogen-rich roots regulate microbial- and plant-derived carbon in alkali-saline soil under land-use conversions in the Songnen Plain Field traffic loads on a silty farm site cause shifting and narrowing of soil pore size distribution Calcium lactate as a soil amendment: Mechanistic insights into its effect on salinity, alkalinity, and aggregation in saline-alkaline soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1