移动性变色龙:共享微移动性的当前和潜在用户

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100967
Roxani Gkavra , Yusak O. Susilo , Anna Grigolon , Karst Geurs , Oliver Roider
{"title":"移动性变色龙:共享微移动性的当前和潜在用户","authors":"Roxani Gkavra ,&nbsp;Yusak O. Susilo ,&nbsp;Anna Grigolon ,&nbsp;Karst Geurs ,&nbsp;Oliver Roider","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bike and e-scooter sharing schemes are an emerging addition to modern urban mobility systems. The research aims to identify the mobility and sociodemographic user profile of bike and e-scooter sharing and understand the key determinants of people’s intention to use these modes in the future.<!--> <!-->To consider the effect of local context on shared micromobility usage, the study exploited survey data (N = 1607)<!--> <!-->that<!--> <!-->were<!--> <!-->collected<!--> <!-->in three European urban areas (Brussels, Munich, and Vienna). The obtained dataset provided information on respondents’ socioeconomic characteristics, mobility capabilities and preferences, including travel frequency by bike and e-scooter sharing services. The survey also collected information on respondents’ likelihood of travelling by shared micromobility<!--> <!-->in the future.<!--> <!-->The profile of current users was revealed<!--> <!-->by conducting a Latent Class Analysis (LCA). The measurement and membership LCA models were estimated based on the mobility and sociodemographic data, respectively. The three-class LCA model uncovered that shared micromobility users<!--> <!-->are<!--> <!-->mostly<!--> <!-->members of<!--> <!-->the so-called “Mobility chameleons” population group whereas few users belong to the “Car lovers” and the “Public transport fans” classes. Mobility chameleons<!--> <!-->travel by private, public, and shared modes, as well as by both motorized and active modes.<!--> <!-->Males,<!--> <!-->with medium and high income, who own a smartphone, dominate this group. Although mobility chameleons are present in all study areas, their share in the population varies. Regarding potential future usage, people’s willingness to travel by shared micromobility in the future is much higher than the present usage levels captured. Modelling the potential demand revealed that while many factors similarly influence the likelihood of travelling by bike and e-scooter sharing, the significance and strength of the effects vary for the two modes. The present research findings provide relevant input for modelling as well as predicting shared micromobility usage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100967"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobility chameleons: The current and potential users of shared micromobility\",\"authors\":\"Roxani Gkavra ,&nbsp;Yusak O. Susilo ,&nbsp;Anna Grigolon ,&nbsp;Karst Geurs ,&nbsp;Oliver Roider\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Bike and e-scooter sharing schemes are an emerging addition to modern urban mobility systems. The research aims to identify the mobility and sociodemographic user profile of bike and e-scooter sharing and understand the key determinants of people’s intention to use these modes in the future.<!--> <!-->To consider the effect of local context on shared micromobility usage, the study exploited survey data (N = 1607)<!--> <!-->that<!--> <!-->were<!--> <!-->collected<!--> <!-->in three European urban areas (Brussels, Munich, and Vienna). The obtained dataset provided information on respondents’ socioeconomic characteristics, mobility capabilities and preferences, including travel frequency by bike and e-scooter sharing services. The survey also collected information on respondents’ likelihood of travelling by shared micromobility<!--> <!-->in the future.<!--> <!-->The profile of current users was revealed<!--> <!-->by conducting a Latent Class Analysis (LCA). The measurement and membership LCA models were estimated based on the mobility and sociodemographic data, respectively. The three-class LCA model uncovered that shared micromobility users<!--> <!-->are<!--> <!-->mostly<!--> <!-->members of<!--> <!-->the so-called “Mobility chameleons” population group whereas few users belong to the “Car lovers” and the “Public transport fans” classes. Mobility chameleons<!--> <!-->travel by private, public, and shared modes, as well as by both motorized and active modes.<!--> <!-->Males,<!--> <!-->with medium and high income, who own a smartphone, dominate this group. Although mobility chameleons are present in all study areas, their share in the population varies. Regarding potential future usage, people’s willingness to travel by shared micromobility in the future is much higher than the present usage levels captured. Modelling the potential demand revealed that while many factors similarly influence the likelihood of travelling by bike and e-scooter sharing, the significance and strength of the effects vary for the two modes. The present research findings provide relevant input for modelling as well as predicting shared micromobility usage.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24002308\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24002308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自行车和电动滑板车共享计划是现代城市交通系统的新兴组成部分。该研究旨在确定自行车和电动滑板车共享的移动性和社会人口统计用户概况,并了解人们未来使用这些模式的意图的关键决定因素。为了考虑当地环境对共享微交通工具使用的影响,该研究利用了在三个欧洲城市地区(布鲁塞尔、慕尼黑和维也纳)收集的调查数据(N = 1607)。获得的数据集提供了受访者的社会经济特征、移动能力和偏好的信息,包括自行车和电动滑板车共享服务的出行频率。该调查还收集了受访者未来使用共享微出行方式的可能性信息。通过进行潜在类别分析(LCA)揭示了当前用户的概况。基于流动性和社会人口统计数据分别估算了测量和成员LCA模型。三级LCA模型发现,共享微出行用户大多属于所谓的“出行变色龙”群体,而属于“汽车爱好者”和“公共交通爱好者”群体的用户很少。出行方式千变万化,包括私人出行、公共出行和共享出行,以及机动出行和主动出行。拥有智能手机的中高收入男性在这一群体中占主导地位。虽然所有的研究区域都有变色龙,但它们在种群中的比例各不相同。关于潜在的未来使用情况,人们未来通过共享微交通出行的意愿远远高于目前的使用水平。对潜在需求的建模显示,虽然许多因素相似地影响了自行车和电动滑板车共享出行的可能性,但两种模式的影响程度和强度各不相同。目前的研究结果为建模和预测共享微流动性的使用提供了相关的输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mobility chameleons: The current and potential users of shared micromobility
Bike and e-scooter sharing schemes are an emerging addition to modern urban mobility systems. The research aims to identify the mobility and sociodemographic user profile of bike and e-scooter sharing and understand the key determinants of people’s intention to use these modes in the future. To consider the effect of local context on shared micromobility usage, the study exploited survey data (N = 1607) that were collected in three European urban areas (Brussels, Munich, and Vienna). The obtained dataset provided information on respondents’ socioeconomic characteristics, mobility capabilities and preferences, including travel frequency by bike and e-scooter sharing services. The survey also collected information on respondents’ likelihood of travelling by shared micromobility in the future. The profile of current users was revealed by conducting a Latent Class Analysis (LCA). The measurement and membership LCA models were estimated based on the mobility and sociodemographic data, respectively. The three-class LCA model uncovered that shared micromobility users are mostly members of the so-called “Mobility chameleons” population group whereas few users belong to the “Car lovers” and the “Public transport fans” classes. Mobility chameleons travel by private, public, and shared modes, as well as by both motorized and active modes. Males, with medium and high income, who own a smartphone, dominate this group. Although mobility chameleons are present in all study areas, their share in the population varies. Regarding potential future usage, people’s willingness to travel by shared micromobility in the future is much higher than the present usage levels captured. Modelling the potential demand revealed that while many factors similarly influence the likelihood of travelling by bike and e-scooter sharing, the significance and strength of the effects vary for the two modes. The present research findings provide relevant input for modelling as well as predicting shared micromobility usage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the retardant effectiveness of node-based driving restriction policies in mitigating congestion Car ownership through the parenting journey and beyond Built environment effects on dockless bikesharing–metro integration: A spatial nonlinear analysis Traffic crash risk among on-demand food delivery riders in Danang city, Vietnam: Key contributing factors Changes in the predictors of transit ridership in post-COVID-19 US metropolitan areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1