双滤过血浆置换治疗类固醇和/或IVIG无反应的神经元表面抗体相关自身免疫性脑炎的疗效

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMC Neurology Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1186/s12883-024-03971-y
Xiaowan Liang, Chen Zhang, Jun Xue, Yin Zheng
{"title":"双滤过血浆置换治疗类固醇和/或IVIG无反应的神经元表面抗体相关自身免疫性脑炎的疗效","authors":"Xiaowan Liang, Chen Zhang, Jun Xue, Yin Zheng","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-03971-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Whether double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is effective in the patients who do not response to the initial immunotherapy is uncertain. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DFPP in the treatment of patients who had no improvement after initial immunotherapy (steroids and/or immunoglobulin (IVIG)), and moreover, to investigate the factors associated with the efficacy of DFPP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 1st, 2014, to December 30th,2018, a total of 26 patients who were diagnosed autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and were received the treatment of DFPP after unsuccessful or incomplete recovery from their early immune therapy (including intravenous high-dose cortisone, IVIG and or immunosuppressant) for at least 21 days were investigated. Their plasmapheresis volume, the course of disease, treatment sessions, and complications were recorded. The efficacy of DFPP within a week were assessed by modified Rankin scale (mRS). These patients were followed until six months after the last session of DFPP treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The duration between the onset of symptoms and DFPP administration was 54.5 days (range 21-243 days). The median DFPP sessions for each patient were three (range 2-6 sessions), and the mean volume of plasma exchange was 50.5 ± 11.1 ml/kg/session. Total clinically relevant improvement was observed in 57.7% of the patients. The median mRS was decreased from 5 to 4 within one week after DFPP treatment (P < 0.001). Only one patient relapsed in the following six months after DFPP. The effectiveness of DFPP has no relationship with age, gender, the type of antibody, with or without neoplasm, clinical course and the volume of plasma exchange. Most patients tolerated well, except 2 cases. One encountered mild allergic reaction and the other had a transient hypotension during DFPP treatment, but both were corrected rapidly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DFPP is an effective and safe treatment option for patients who have poor responsiveness to early immunotherapy).</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":"24 1","pages":"475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of double filtration plasmapheresis in the treatment of steroid and/or IVIG unresponsive neuronal surface antibodies associated autoimmune encephalitis.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaowan Liang, Chen Zhang, Jun Xue, Yin Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12883-024-03971-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Whether double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is effective in the patients who do not response to the initial immunotherapy is uncertain. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DFPP in the treatment of patients who had no improvement after initial immunotherapy (steroids and/or immunoglobulin (IVIG)), and moreover, to investigate the factors associated with the efficacy of DFPP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 1st, 2014, to December 30th,2018, a total of 26 patients who were diagnosed autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and were received the treatment of DFPP after unsuccessful or incomplete recovery from their early immune therapy (including intravenous high-dose cortisone, IVIG and or immunosuppressant) for at least 21 days were investigated. Their plasmapheresis volume, the course of disease, treatment sessions, and complications were recorded. The efficacy of DFPP within a week were assessed by modified Rankin scale (mRS). These patients were followed until six months after the last session of DFPP treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The duration between the onset of symptoms and DFPP administration was 54.5 days (range 21-243 days). The median DFPP sessions for each patient were three (range 2-6 sessions), and the mean volume of plasma exchange was 50.5 ± 11.1 ml/kg/session. Total clinically relevant improvement was observed in 57.7% of the patients. The median mRS was decreased from 5 to 4 within one week after DFPP treatment (P < 0.001). Only one patient relapsed in the following six months after DFPP. The effectiveness of DFPP has no relationship with age, gender, the type of antibody, with or without neoplasm, clinical course and the volume of plasma exchange. Most patients tolerated well, except 2 cases. One encountered mild allergic reaction and the other had a transient hypotension during DFPP treatment, but both were corrected rapidly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DFPP is an effective and safe treatment option for patients who have poor responsiveness to early immunotherapy).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622563/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03971-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03971-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双滤过血浆置换(DFPP)对初始免疫治疗无反应的患者是否有效尚不确定。本回顾性研究旨在评估DFPP治疗初始免疫治疗(类固醇和/或免疫球蛋白(IVIG))后无改善的患者的有效性和安全性,并探讨与DFPP疗效相关的因素。方法:选取2014年1月1日至2018年12月30日诊断为自身免疫性脑炎(AE)的26例患者,在早期免疫治疗(包括静脉注射大剂量可的松、IVIG和/或免疫抑制剂)不成功或不完全恢复后接受DFPP治疗至少21天。记录血浆置换量、病程、疗程及并发症。采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评价DFPP一周内的疗效。这些患者在最后一次DFPP治疗后随访6个月。结果:从出现症状到服用DFPP的时间为54.5天(21 ~ 243天)。每位患者的DFPP疗程中位数为3次(范围2-6次),平均血浆置换量为50.5±11.1 ml/kg/次。57.7%的患者临床相关症状得到改善。在DFPP治疗后一周内,mRS中位数从5下降到4 (P结论:对于早期免疫治疗反应性差的患者,DFPP是一种有效且安全的治疗选择)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of double filtration plasmapheresis in the treatment of steroid and/or IVIG unresponsive neuronal surface antibodies associated autoimmune encephalitis.

Introduction: Whether double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is effective in the patients who do not response to the initial immunotherapy is uncertain. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DFPP in the treatment of patients who had no improvement after initial immunotherapy (steroids and/or immunoglobulin (IVIG)), and moreover, to investigate the factors associated with the efficacy of DFPP.

Methods: From January 1st, 2014, to December 30th,2018, a total of 26 patients who were diagnosed autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and were received the treatment of DFPP after unsuccessful or incomplete recovery from their early immune therapy (including intravenous high-dose cortisone, IVIG and or immunosuppressant) for at least 21 days were investigated. Their plasmapheresis volume, the course of disease, treatment sessions, and complications were recorded. The efficacy of DFPP within a week were assessed by modified Rankin scale (mRS). These patients were followed until six months after the last session of DFPP treatment.

Results: The duration between the onset of symptoms and DFPP administration was 54.5 days (range 21-243 days). The median DFPP sessions for each patient were three (range 2-6 sessions), and the mean volume of plasma exchange was 50.5 ± 11.1 ml/kg/session. Total clinically relevant improvement was observed in 57.7% of the patients. The median mRS was decreased from 5 to 4 within one week after DFPP treatment (P < 0.001). Only one patient relapsed in the following six months after DFPP. The effectiveness of DFPP has no relationship with age, gender, the type of antibody, with or without neoplasm, clinical course and the volume of plasma exchange. Most patients tolerated well, except 2 cases. One encountered mild allergic reaction and the other had a transient hypotension during DFPP treatment, but both were corrected rapidly.

Conclusion: DFPP is an effective and safe treatment option for patients who have poor responsiveness to early immunotherapy).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
The expression changes endothelial and fibrinolytic biomarkers in acute ischemic stroke patients with OSA. Fast-acting treatment of myasthenic crisis with efgartigimod from the perspective of the neonatal intensive care unit. Unique amnestic syndrome after isolated left anterolateral thalamic stroke: a case report. Time moving 100-fold slower: time distortion as a diagnostic clue in anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. A Chinese patient with cardiogenic stroke and warfarin resistance: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1