质子泵抑制剂在养老院的过度和不足使用:一项多地点纵向队列研究。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105393
Nasir Wabe, Rachel Urwin, Isabelle Meulenbroeks, Karla Seaman, Magdalena Z Raban, Sangita Neupane, Amy Nguyen, Sandun M Silva, Andrea Timothy, Narjis Batool, Lisa Pont, Johanna I Westbrook
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂在养老院的过度和不足使用:一项多地点纵向队列研究。","authors":"Nasir Wabe, Rachel Urwin, Isabelle Meulenbroeks, Karla Seaman, Magdalena Z Raban, Sangita Neupane, Amy Nguyen, Sandun M Silva, Andrea Timothy, Narjis Batool, Lisa Pont, Johanna I Westbrook","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used to manage excess stomach acid production and provide gastroprotection from bleeding risk-increasing drugs (BRIDs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate PPI use in nursing homes and associated factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Longitudinal cohort study using 8 years of electronic data.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>The study included 6439 permanent residents aged ≥65 years from 34 homes managed by 2 aged care providers in New South Wales.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Continuous PPI use (>12 weeks) in the absence of long-term BRID (>30 days) use was deemed inappropriate overuse whereas long-term BRID use without concomitant PPI for gastroprotection was classified as inappropriate underuse. Binary logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with PPI overuse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four percent of residents (n = 3478) received a PPI, with a median duration of 46 weeks, whereas 58.5% (n = 3770) were long-term BRID users. Four of 5 PPI users (83.6%, n = 2906) used PPIs for >12 weeks, and after accounting for BRID use, the prevalence of inappropriate PPI overuse was 27.1% (n = 944). PPI overuse was 4 times more likely in residents in provider A compared with residents in provider B [odds ratio (OR) 4.08, 95% CI 2.73-6.09]. The prevalence of PPI underuse was 38.5% (n = 1452).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>One in 4 PPI users exceeded the clinically recommended duration, whereas 2 in 5 long-term BRID users did not receive a PPI for gastroprotection. There is a pressing need for tailored interventions, such as medication reviews and deprescribing initiatives, to improve PPI prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105393"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Over- and Underuse of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Nursing Homes: A Multisite Longitudinal Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nasir Wabe, Rachel Urwin, Isabelle Meulenbroeks, Karla Seaman, Magdalena Z Raban, Sangita Neupane, Amy Nguyen, Sandun M Silva, Andrea Timothy, Narjis Batool, Lisa Pont, Johanna I Westbrook\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used to manage excess stomach acid production and provide gastroprotection from bleeding risk-increasing drugs (BRIDs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate PPI use in nursing homes and associated factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Longitudinal cohort study using 8 years of electronic data.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>The study included 6439 permanent residents aged ≥65 years from 34 homes managed by 2 aged care providers in New South Wales.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Continuous PPI use (>12 weeks) in the absence of long-term BRID (>30 days) use was deemed inappropriate overuse whereas long-term BRID use without concomitant PPI for gastroprotection was classified as inappropriate underuse. Binary logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with PPI overuse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four percent of residents (n = 3478) received a PPI, with a median duration of 46 weeks, whereas 58.5% (n = 3770) were long-term BRID users. Four of 5 PPI users (83.6%, n = 2906) used PPIs for >12 weeks, and after accounting for BRID use, the prevalence of inappropriate PPI overuse was 27.1% (n = 944). PPI overuse was 4 times more likely in residents in provider A compared with residents in provider B [odds ratio (OR) 4.08, 95% CI 2.73-6.09]. The prevalence of PPI underuse was 38.5% (n = 1452).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>One in 4 PPI users exceeded the clinically recommended duration, whereas 2 in 5 long-term BRID users did not receive a PPI for gastroprotection. There is a pressing need for tailored interventions, such as medication reviews and deprescribing initiatives, to improve PPI prescribing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105393\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)用于控制过量胃酸的产生,并提供胃保护,免受出血风险增加药物(BRIDs)的影响。我们的目的是确定疗养院中潜在的不适当PPI使用的流行程度和相关因素。设计:使用8年电子数据的纵向队列研究。环境和参与者:该研究包括来自新南威尔士州由2名老年护理提供者管理的34个家庭的6439名年龄≥65岁的永久居民。方法:在没有长期BRID(>30天)的情况下,持续使用PPI(>12周)被认为是不适当的过度使用,而长期BRID使用而不同时使用PPI用于胃保护被认为是不适当的使用不足。采用二元逻辑回归确定与PPI过度使用相关的因素。结果:54%的居民(n = 3478)接受了PPI,中位持续时间为46周,而58.5%的居民(n = 3770)是长期BRID使用者。5名PPI使用者中有4名(83.6%,n = 2906)使用PPI长达10至12周,在考虑BRID使用后,不适当PPI过度使用的患病率为27.1% (n = 944)。提供者A的居民PPI过度使用的可能性是提供者B的4倍[比值比(OR) 4.08, 95% CI 2.73-6.09]。PPI未充分使用的患病率为38.5% (n = 1452)。结论和意义:1 / 4的PPI使用者超过了临床推荐的持续时间,而2 / 5的长期BRID使用者没有接受PPI来保护胃。迫切需要量身定制的干预措施,如药物审查和处方减少倡议,以改善PPI处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Over- and Underuse of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Nursing Homes: A Multisite Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Objectives: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used to manage excess stomach acid production and provide gastroprotection from bleeding risk-increasing drugs (BRIDs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate PPI use in nursing homes and associated factors.

Design: Longitudinal cohort study using 8 years of electronic data.

Setting and participants: The study included 6439 permanent residents aged ≥65 years from 34 homes managed by 2 aged care providers in New South Wales.

Method: Continuous PPI use (>12 weeks) in the absence of long-term BRID (>30 days) use was deemed inappropriate overuse whereas long-term BRID use without concomitant PPI for gastroprotection was classified as inappropriate underuse. Binary logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with PPI overuse.

Results: Fifty-four percent of residents (n = 3478) received a PPI, with a median duration of 46 weeks, whereas 58.5% (n = 3770) were long-term BRID users. Four of 5 PPI users (83.6%, n = 2906) used PPIs for >12 weeks, and after accounting for BRID use, the prevalence of inappropriate PPI overuse was 27.1% (n = 944). PPI overuse was 4 times more likely in residents in provider A compared with residents in provider B [odds ratio (OR) 4.08, 95% CI 2.73-6.09]. The prevalence of PPI underuse was 38.5% (n = 1452).

Conclusions and implications: One in 4 PPI users exceeded the clinically recommended duration, whereas 2 in 5 long-term BRID users did not receive a PPI for gastroprotection. There is a pressing need for tailored interventions, such as medication reviews and deprescribing initiatives, to improve PPI prescribing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Medication Use in People Aged 90 Years and Older: A Nationwide Study. Adherence to Guideline Recommendations on Psychotropic Drug Use for Challenging Behavior in Dementia. Quality and Safety Indicators for Care Transitions by Older Adults: A Scoping Review. Experiences of Care Aides Caring for Residents with a History of Psychological Trauma in Long-Term Care Homes (Nursing Homes)-Early Findings. Association between Multimorbidity and End-of-Life Outcomes among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Evidence from 28 Countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1