Yuhan Lin , Ying Chen , Wenqing Tu , Bifang Mai , Danying Guo , Yuan Li , Yongtong Chen , Shuanglun Xie , Yuyang Chen
{"title":"心力衰竭患者睡眠呼吸障碍治疗的比较效果：一项综合系统评价和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Yuhan Lin , Ying Chen , Wenqing Tu , Bifang Mai , Danying Guo , Yuan Li , Yongtong Chen , Shuanglun Xie , Yuyang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with heart failure (HF) is a significant concern, leading to adverse outcomes. This network meta-analysis (NMA) is dedicated to evaluate the relative effectiveness of diverse therapeutic approaches for SDB treatments in the context of HF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An extensive search up to May 19, 2023, was implemented in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). These trials compared adaptive servo ventilation (ASV), automatic positive airway pressure (APAP), Bi-level positive pressure ventilation (Bi-level PPV), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and oxygen therapy against placebo or standard treatment. Key outcomes included cardiac function indicators (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], plasma B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] levels), polysomnography data (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], Mean and Minimum Oxygen Saturation), and patient-reported quality of life measures (Epworth sleepiness scale [ESS]). A random-effects Bayesian NMA was utilized to evaluate and compare the efficacy of these interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study revealed significant therapeutic effects of different interventions in sleep apnea patients. For patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), CPAP demonstrated superior efficacy in enhancing average oxygen saturation (mean difference (MD) = 0.98; 95 % credible interval (CI) [0.07,2.09]), improving LVEF (MD = 5.66; 95 % CI [0.71, 10.08]), and reducing AHI (MD = −20.61; 95 % CI [-33.84, −9.9]). In the case of central sleep apnea (CSA), the therapeutic approaches showed varying degrees of effectiveness. CPAP proved most effective for enhancing average oxygen saturation(MD = 1.1; 95 % CI [0.26,1.98]). ASV was the most effective in lowering AHI (MD = −32.11; 95 % CI [-47.5, −17.16]), increasing lowest oxygen saturation (MD = 8.14; 95 % CI [1.72,14.92]), and enhancing LVEF (MD = 6.58; 95 % CI [0.06,12.49]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>No single SDB treatment uniformly benefits all clinical indicators in SDB and HF patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 107907"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of therapies for sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure patients: A comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yuhan Lin , Ying Chen , Wenqing Tu , Bifang Mai , Danying Guo , Yuan Li , Yongtong Chen , Shuanglun Xie , Yuyang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with heart failure (HF) is a significant concern, leading to adverse outcomes. This network meta-analysis (NMA) is dedicated to evaluate the relative effectiveness of diverse therapeutic approaches for SDB treatments in the context of HF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An extensive search up to May 19, 2023, was implemented in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). These trials compared adaptive servo ventilation (ASV), automatic positive airway pressure (APAP), Bi-level positive pressure ventilation (Bi-level PPV), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and oxygen therapy against placebo or standard treatment. Key outcomes included cardiac function indicators (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], plasma B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] levels), polysomnography data (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], Mean and Minimum Oxygen Saturation), and patient-reported quality of life measures (Epworth sleepiness scale [ESS]). A random-effects Bayesian NMA was utilized to evaluate and compare the efficacy of these interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study revealed significant therapeutic effects of different interventions in sleep apnea patients. For patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), CPAP demonstrated superior efficacy in enhancing average oxygen saturation (mean difference (MD) = 0.98; 95 % credible interval (CI) [0.07,2.09]), improving LVEF (MD = 5.66; 95 % CI [0.71, 10.08]), and reducing AHI (MD = −20.61; 95 % CI [-33.84, −9.9]). In the case of central sleep apnea (CSA), the therapeutic approaches showed varying degrees of effectiveness. CPAP proved most effective for enhancing average oxygen saturation(MD = 1.1; 95 % CI [0.26,1.98]). ASV was the most effective in lowering AHI (MD = −32.11; 95 % CI [-47.5, −17.16]), increasing lowest oxygen saturation (MD = 8.14; 95 % CI [1.72,14.92]), and enhancing LVEF (MD = 6.58; 95 % CI [0.06,12.49]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>No single SDB treatment uniformly benefits all clinical indicators in SDB and HF patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\"236 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107907\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124003822\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124003822","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative effectiveness of therapies for sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure patients: A comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis
Background
The prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with heart failure (HF) is a significant concern, leading to adverse outcomes. This network meta-analysis (NMA) is dedicated to evaluate the relative effectiveness of diverse therapeutic approaches for SDB treatments in the context of HF.
Methods
An extensive search up to May 19, 2023, was implemented in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). These trials compared adaptive servo ventilation (ASV), automatic positive airway pressure (APAP), Bi-level positive pressure ventilation (Bi-level PPV), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and oxygen therapy against placebo or standard treatment. Key outcomes included cardiac function indicators (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], plasma B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] levels), polysomnography data (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], Mean and Minimum Oxygen Saturation), and patient-reported quality of life measures (Epworth sleepiness scale [ESS]). A random-effects Bayesian NMA was utilized to evaluate and compare the efficacy of these interventions.
Results
The study revealed significant therapeutic effects of different interventions in sleep apnea patients. For patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), CPAP demonstrated superior efficacy in enhancing average oxygen saturation (mean difference (MD) = 0.98; 95 % credible interval (CI) [0.07,2.09]), improving LVEF (MD = 5.66; 95 % CI [0.71, 10.08]), and reducing AHI (MD = −20.61; 95 % CI [-33.84, −9.9]). In the case of central sleep apnea (CSA), the therapeutic approaches showed varying degrees of effectiveness. CPAP proved most effective for enhancing average oxygen saturation(MD = 1.1; 95 % CI [0.26,1.98]). ASV was the most effective in lowering AHI (MD = −32.11; 95 % CI [-47.5, −17.16]), increasing lowest oxygen saturation (MD = 8.14; 95 % CI [1.72,14.92]), and enhancing LVEF (MD = 6.58; 95 % CI [0.06,12.49]).
Conclusion
No single SDB treatment uniformly benefits all clinical indicators in SDB and HF patients.
期刊介绍：
Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants.
Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
