Bisma B Patrianesha, Steffie M B Peters, Deni Hardiansyah, Rien Ritawidya, Bastiaan M Privé, James Nagarajah, Mark W Konijnenberg, Gerhard Glatting
{"title":"使用模型选择和贝叶斯拟合方法的单时间点剂量学:概念的证明。","authors":"Bisma B Patrianesha, Steffie M B Peters, Deni Hardiansyah, Rien Ritawidya, Bastiaan M Privé, James Nagarajah, Mark W Konijnenberg, Gerhard Glatting","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine the effect of model selection on simplified dosimetry for the kidneys using Bayesian fitting (BF) and single-time-point (STP) imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Kidney biokinetics data of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 from mHSPC were collected using SPECT/CT after injection of (3.1 ± 0.1) GBq at time points T1(2.3 ± 0.5), T2(23.8 ± 2.0), T3(47.7 ± 2.2), T4(71.8 ± 2.2), and T5(167.4 ± 1.9) h post-injection. Eleven functions with various parameterizations and a combination of shared and individual parameters were used for model selection. Model averaging of functions with an Akaike weight of >10 % was used to calculate the reference TIAC (TIAC<sub>REF</sub>). STP BF method (STP-BF) was performed to determine the STP TIACs (TIAC<sub>STP-BF</sub>). The STP-BF performance was assessed by calculating the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of relative deviation between TIAC<sub>STP-BF</sub> and TIAC<sub>REF</sub>. In addition, the STP-BF performance was compared to the Hänscheid Method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The function [Formula: see text] with shared parameter λ<sub>2</sub> was selected as the best function (Akaike weight of 57.91 %). STP-BF using the best function resulted in RMSEs of 20.3 %, 9.1 %, 8.4 %, 13.6 %, and 19.3 % at T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. The RMSEs of STP-Hänscheid were 22.4 %, 14.6 %, and 21.9 % at T2, T3, and T4, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A model selection was presented to determine the fit function for calculating TIACs in STP-BF. This study shows that the STP dosimetry using BF and model selection performed better than the frequently used STP Hänscheid method.</p>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"129 ","pages":"104868"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-time-point dosimetry using model selection and the Bayesian fitting method: A proof of concept.\",\"authors\":\"Bisma B Patrianesha, Steffie M B Peters, Deni Hardiansyah, Rien Ritawidya, Bastiaan M Privé, James Nagarajah, Mark W Konijnenberg, Gerhard Glatting\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine the effect of model selection on simplified dosimetry for the kidneys using Bayesian fitting (BF) and single-time-point (STP) imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Kidney biokinetics data of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 from mHSPC were collected using SPECT/CT after injection of (3.1 ± 0.1) GBq at time points T1(2.3 ± 0.5), T2(23.8 ± 2.0), T3(47.7 ± 2.2), T4(71.8 ± 2.2), and T5(167.4 ± 1.9) h post-injection. Eleven functions with various parameterizations and a combination of shared and individual parameters were used for model selection. Model averaging of functions with an Akaike weight of >10 % was used to calculate the reference TIAC (TIAC<sub>REF</sub>). STP BF method (STP-BF) was performed to determine the STP TIACs (TIAC<sub>STP-BF</sub>). The STP-BF performance was assessed by calculating the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of relative deviation between TIAC<sub>STP-BF</sub> and TIAC<sub>REF</sub>. In addition, the STP-BF performance was compared to the Hänscheid Method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The function [Formula: see text] with shared parameter λ<sub>2</sub> was selected as the best function (Akaike weight of 57.91 %). STP-BF using the best function resulted in RMSEs of 20.3 %, 9.1 %, 8.4 %, 13.6 %, and 19.3 % at T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. The RMSEs of STP-Hänscheid were 22.4 %, 14.6 %, and 21.9 % at T2, T3, and T4, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A model selection was presented to determine the fit function for calculating TIACs in STP-BF. This study shows that the STP dosimetry using BF and model selection performed better than the frequently used STP Hänscheid method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"104868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104868\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Single-time-point dosimetry using model selection and the Bayesian fitting method: A proof of concept.
Purpose: This study aimed to determine the effect of model selection on simplified dosimetry for the kidneys using Bayesian fitting (BF) and single-time-point (STP) imaging.
Methods: Kidney biokinetics data of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 from mHSPC were collected using SPECT/CT after injection of (3.1 ± 0.1) GBq at time points T1(2.3 ± 0.5), T2(23.8 ± 2.0), T3(47.7 ± 2.2), T4(71.8 ± 2.2), and T5(167.4 ± 1.9) h post-injection. Eleven functions with various parameterizations and a combination of shared and individual parameters were used for model selection. Model averaging of functions with an Akaike weight of >10 % was used to calculate the reference TIAC (TIACREF). STP BF method (STP-BF) was performed to determine the STP TIACs (TIACSTP-BF). The STP-BF performance was assessed by calculating the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of relative deviation between TIACSTP-BF and TIACREF. In addition, the STP-BF performance was compared to the Hänscheid Method.
Results: The function [Formula: see text] with shared parameter λ2 was selected as the best function (Akaike weight of 57.91 %). STP-BF using the best function resulted in RMSEs of 20.3 %, 9.1 %, 8.4 %, 13.6 %, and 19.3 % at T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. The RMSEs of STP-Hänscheid were 22.4 %, 14.6 %, and 21.9 % at T2, T3, and T4, respectively.
Conclusion: A model selection was presented to determine the fit function for calculating TIACs in STP-BF. This study shows that the STP dosimetry using BF and model selection performed better than the frequently used STP Hänscheid method.
期刊介绍:
Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics:
Medical Imaging
Radiation Therapy
Radiation Protection
Measuring Systems and Signal Processing
Education and training in Medical Physics
Professional issues in Medical Physics.