按需伏诺哌赞治疗轻度反流性食管炎的长期疗效:成功率和治疗失败的预测因素

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Esophagus Pub Date : 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1007/s10388-024-01099-z
Yoshimasa Hoshikawa, Mai Koeda, Takahiro Rokugo, Eri Momma, Noriyuki Kawami, Katsuhiko Iwakiri
{"title":"按需伏诺哌赞治疗轻度反流性食管炎的长期疗效:成功率和治疗失败的预测因素","authors":"Yoshimasa Hoshikawa, Mai Koeda, Takahiro Rokugo, Eri Momma, Noriyuki Kawami, Katsuhiko Iwakiri","doi":"10.1007/s10388-024-01099-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concerns surrounding long-term proton pump inhibitor use have prompted the exploration of alternative treatments for reflux esophagitis (RE). We previously demonstrated that 24 weeks of on-demand treatment with vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, effectively managed mild RE (Los Angeles classification grade A/B) in more than 80% of patients. However, its long-term efficacy remains unknown. Therefore, the present study investigated sustained effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study on 30 participants with mild RE from our previous research. Participants with recurrent RE or symptom exacerbation were excluded and considered as treatment failure. Participants with the remission of RE and reflux symptoms under on-demand treatment until the clinic visit between October 2023 and February 2024 were regarded as treatment success. Predictors of treatment failure were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the observation period, 5 participants failed treatment due to symptom exacerbation and 6 due to recurrent RE. Five participants were excluded from analyses due to non-GERD causes. Fourteen participants (56.0%) successfully continued on-demand treatment for 91.5 months [89.3-92.8]. Age > 67 years significantly predicted treatment failure with a sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 85.7%. Although none of the patients with RE grade A had recurrent RE, it was not a significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approximately 50% of patients with mild RE successfully continued on-demand treatment for more than 7 years. Age > 67 years was identified as a predictor of treatment failure. Prospective multi-center studies are warranted to validate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11918,"journal":{"name":"Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term efficacy of on-demand vonoprazan treatment for mild reflux esophagitis: success rates and predictors of treatment failure.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshimasa Hoshikawa, Mai Koeda, Takahiro Rokugo, Eri Momma, Noriyuki Kawami, Katsuhiko Iwakiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10388-024-01099-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concerns surrounding long-term proton pump inhibitor use have prompted the exploration of alternative treatments for reflux esophagitis (RE). We previously demonstrated that 24 weeks of on-demand treatment with vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, effectively managed mild RE (Los Angeles classification grade A/B) in more than 80% of patients. However, its long-term efficacy remains unknown. Therefore, the present study investigated sustained effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study on 30 participants with mild RE from our previous research. Participants with recurrent RE or symptom exacerbation were excluded and considered as treatment failure. Participants with the remission of RE and reflux symptoms under on-demand treatment until the clinic visit between October 2023 and February 2024 were regarded as treatment success. Predictors of treatment failure were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the observation period, 5 participants failed treatment due to symptom exacerbation and 6 due to recurrent RE. Five participants were excluded from analyses due to non-GERD causes. Fourteen participants (56.0%) successfully continued on-demand treatment for 91.5 months [89.3-92.8]. Age > 67 years significantly predicted treatment failure with a sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 85.7%. Although none of the patients with RE grade A had recurrent RE, it was not a significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approximately 50% of patients with mild RE successfully continued on-demand treatment for more than 7 years. Age > 67 years was identified as a predictor of treatment failure. Prospective multi-center studies are warranted to validate these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Esophagus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-024-01099-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-024-01099-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对长期使用质子泵抑制剂的担忧促使人们探索反流性食管炎(RE)的替代治疗方法。我们之前证明,vonoprazan(一种钾竞争酸阻滞剂)按需治疗24周后,超过80%的患者有效地治疗了轻度RE(洛杉矶分级a /B)。然而,其长期疗效尚不清楚。因此,本研究调查了持续有效性。方法:我们对我们之前研究的30例轻度RE患者进行回顾性观察研究。复发性RE或症状加重的参与者被排除,并被视为治疗失败。在2023年10月至2024年2月期间接受按需治疗的RE和反流症状缓解的参与者被视为治疗成功。分析治疗失败的预测因素。结果:观察期内,5例患者因症状加重而治疗失败,6例患者因复发性食管反流而治疗失败。5例患者因非反流原因被排除在分析之外。14名参与者(56.0%)成功地持续按需治疗91.5个月[89.3-92.8]。年龄bb ~ 67岁显著预测治疗失败,敏感性为72.7%,特异性为85.7%。虽然A级RE患者均无复发,但差异无统计学意义。结论:大约50%的轻度RE患者成功地持续按需治疗超过7年。年龄bb0 - 67岁被确定为治疗失败的预测因子。有必要进行前瞻性多中心研究来验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term efficacy of on-demand vonoprazan treatment for mild reflux esophagitis: success rates and predictors of treatment failure.

Background: Concerns surrounding long-term proton pump inhibitor use have prompted the exploration of alternative treatments for reflux esophagitis (RE). We previously demonstrated that 24 weeks of on-demand treatment with vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, effectively managed mild RE (Los Angeles classification grade A/B) in more than 80% of patients. However, its long-term efficacy remains unknown. Therefore, the present study investigated sustained effectiveness.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study on 30 participants with mild RE from our previous research. Participants with recurrent RE or symptom exacerbation were excluded and considered as treatment failure. Participants with the remission of RE and reflux symptoms under on-demand treatment until the clinic visit between October 2023 and February 2024 were regarded as treatment success. Predictors of treatment failure were analyzed.

Results: During the observation period, 5 participants failed treatment due to symptom exacerbation and 6 due to recurrent RE. Five participants were excluded from analyses due to non-GERD causes. Fourteen participants (56.0%) successfully continued on-demand treatment for 91.5 months [89.3-92.8]. Age > 67 years significantly predicted treatment failure with a sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 85.7%. Although none of the patients with RE grade A had recurrent RE, it was not a significant difference.

Conclusions: Approximately 50% of patients with mild RE successfully continued on-demand treatment for more than 7 years. Age > 67 years was identified as a predictor of treatment failure. Prospective multi-center studies are warranted to validate these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Esophagus
Esophagus GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Esophagus, the official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, introduces practitioners and researchers to significant studies in the fields of benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus. The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, and short articles including technical notes ( How I do it ), which will be peer-reviewed by the editorial board. Letters to the editor are also welcome. Special articles on esophageal diseases will be provided by the editorial board, and proceedings of symposia and workshops will be included in special issues for the Annual Congress of the Society.
期刊最新文献
Circ_DLG1 facilitates cell proliferation and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via upregulating MAP3K9. Investigating the synergistic effects of immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Activation of the tumor cell-intrinsic STING pathway induced by Fusobacterium nucleatum is associated with poor prognosis in esophageal cancer patients. A purely laparoscopic approach can reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. Comparison and validation of the Japanese classification 12th edition and American joint committee on cancer 8th edition on intrathoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1