拓扑基准:系统的基于图形的核心光网络基准测试

IF 4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE Journal of Optical Communications and Networking Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1364/JOCN.534477
Robin Matzner;Akanksha Ahuja;Rasoul Sadeghi;Michael Doherty;Alejandra Beghelli;Seb J. Savory;Polina Bayvel
{"title":"拓扑基准:系统的基于图形的核心光网络基准测试","authors":"Robin Matzner;Akanksha Ahuja;Rasoul Sadeghi;Michael Doherty;Alejandra Beghelli;Seb J. Savory;Polina Bayvel","doi":"10.1364/JOCN.534477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Topology Bench is a comprehensive topology dataset designed to accelerate benchmarking studies in optical networks. The dataset, focusing on core optical networks, comprises publicly accessible and ready-to-use topologies, including (a) 105 georeferenced real-world optical networks and (b) 270,900 validated synthetic topologies. Prior research on real-world core optical networks has been characterized by fragmented open data sources and disparate individual studies. Moreover, previous efforts have notably failed to provide synthetic data at a scale comparable to our present study. Topology Bench addresses this limitation, offering a unified resource, and represents a 61.5% increase in spatially referenced real-world optical networks. To benchmark and identify the fundamental nature of optical network topologies through the lens of graph-theoretical analysis, we analyze both real and synthetic networks using structural, spatial, and spectral metrics. Our comparative analysis identifies constraints in real optical network diversity and illustrates how synthetic networks can complement and expand the range of topologies available for use. Currently, topologies are selected based on subjective criteria, such as preference, data availability, or perceived suitability, leading to potential biases and limited representativeness. Our framework enhances the generalizability of optical network research by providing a more objective and systematic approach to topology selection. A statistical and correlation analysis reveals the quantitative range of all of these graph metrics and the relationships between them. Finally, we apply unsupervised machine learning to cluster real-world topologies into distinctive groups based on nine optimal graph metrics using K-means. It employs a two-step optimization process: optimal features are selected by maximizing feature uniqueness through principal component analysis, and the optimal number of clusters is determined by maximizing decision boundary distances via support vector machines. We conclude the analysis by providing guidance on how to use such clusters to select a diverse set of topologies for future studies. Topology Bench, openly available via Dataset 1 (https://zenodo.org/records/13921775) and Code 1 (https://github.com/TopologyBench), promotes accessibility, consistency, and reproducibility.","PeriodicalId":50103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optical Communications and Networking","volume":"17 1","pages":"7-27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topology Bench: systematic graph-based benchmarking for core optical networks\",\"authors\":\"Robin Matzner;Akanksha Ahuja;Rasoul Sadeghi;Michael Doherty;Alejandra Beghelli;Seb J. Savory;Polina Bayvel\",\"doi\":\"10.1364/JOCN.534477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Topology Bench is a comprehensive topology dataset designed to accelerate benchmarking studies in optical networks. The dataset, focusing on core optical networks, comprises publicly accessible and ready-to-use topologies, including (a) 105 georeferenced real-world optical networks and (b) 270,900 validated synthetic topologies. Prior research on real-world core optical networks has been characterized by fragmented open data sources and disparate individual studies. Moreover, previous efforts have notably failed to provide synthetic data at a scale comparable to our present study. Topology Bench addresses this limitation, offering a unified resource, and represents a 61.5% increase in spatially referenced real-world optical networks. To benchmark and identify the fundamental nature of optical network topologies through the lens of graph-theoretical analysis, we analyze both real and synthetic networks using structural, spatial, and spectral metrics. Our comparative analysis identifies constraints in real optical network diversity and illustrates how synthetic networks can complement and expand the range of topologies available for use. Currently, topologies are selected based on subjective criteria, such as preference, data availability, or perceived suitability, leading to potential biases and limited representativeness. Our framework enhances the generalizability of optical network research by providing a more objective and systematic approach to topology selection. A statistical and correlation analysis reveals the quantitative range of all of these graph metrics and the relationships between them. Finally, we apply unsupervised machine learning to cluster real-world topologies into distinctive groups based on nine optimal graph metrics using K-means. It employs a two-step optimization process: optimal features are selected by maximizing feature uniqueness through principal component analysis, and the optimal number of clusters is determined by maximizing decision boundary distances via support vector machines. We conclude the analysis by providing guidance on how to use such clusters to select a diverse set of topologies for future studies. Topology Bench, openly available via Dataset 1 (https://zenodo.org/records/13921775) and Code 1 (https://github.com/TopologyBench), promotes accessibility, consistency, and reproducibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optical Communications and Networking\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"7-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optical Communications and Networking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10789615/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optical Communications and Networking","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10789615/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拓扑工作台是一个全面的拓扑数据集,旨在加速光网络的基准测试研究。该数据集侧重于核心光网络,包括可公开访问和随时可用的拓扑,包括(a) 105个地理参考的现实世界光网络和(b) 270,900个经过验证的合成拓扑。以往对现实世界核心光网络的研究以开放数据源碎片化和个体研究分散为特征。此外,以前的努力显然未能提供与我们目前研究相当规模的合成数据。拓扑工作台解决了这一限制,提供了统一的资源,并且在空间参考的现实世界光网络中增加了61.5%。为了通过图理论分析的镜头来基准和识别光网络拓扑的基本性质,我们使用结构,空间和光谱度量分析真实和合成网络。我们的比较分析确定了实际光网络多样性的限制,并说明了合成网络如何补充和扩展可用拓扑的范围。目前,拓扑的选择是基于主观标准,如偏好、数据可用性或感知的适用性,导致潜在的偏差和有限的代表性。我们的框架通过提供一种更加客观和系统的拓扑选择方法来增强光网络研究的通用性。统计和相关分析揭示了所有这些图形度量的数量范围以及它们之间的关系。最后,我们应用无监督机器学习,基于K-means的9个最优图度量,将现实世界的拓扑聚类成不同的组。它采用两步优化过程:通过主成分分析最大化特征唯一性来选择最优特征,通过支持向量机最大化决策边界距离来确定最优聚类数量。我们通过提供如何使用这些集群为未来的研究选择不同的拓扑集的指导来结束分析。TopologyBench可以通过Dataset 1 (https://zenodo.org/records/13921775)和Code 1 (https://github.com/TopologyBench)公开获得,它促进了可访问性、一致性和可再现性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Topology Bench: systematic graph-based benchmarking for core optical networks
Topology Bench is a comprehensive topology dataset designed to accelerate benchmarking studies in optical networks. The dataset, focusing on core optical networks, comprises publicly accessible and ready-to-use topologies, including (a) 105 georeferenced real-world optical networks and (b) 270,900 validated synthetic topologies. Prior research on real-world core optical networks has been characterized by fragmented open data sources and disparate individual studies. Moreover, previous efforts have notably failed to provide synthetic data at a scale comparable to our present study. Topology Bench addresses this limitation, offering a unified resource, and represents a 61.5% increase in spatially referenced real-world optical networks. To benchmark and identify the fundamental nature of optical network topologies through the lens of graph-theoretical analysis, we analyze both real and synthetic networks using structural, spatial, and spectral metrics. Our comparative analysis identifies constraints in real optical network diversity and illustrates how synthetic networks can complement and expand the range of topologies available for use. Currently, topologies are selected based on subjective criteria, such as preference, data availability, or perceived suitability, leading to potential biases and limited representativeness. Our framework enhances the generalizability of optical network research by providing a more objective and systematic approach to topology selection. A statistical and correlation analysis reveals the quantitative range of all of these graph metrics and the relationships between them. Finally, we apply unsupervised machine learning to cluster real-world topologies into distinctive groups based on nine optimal graph metrics using K-means. It employs a two-step optimization process: optimal features are selected by maximizing feature uniqueness through principal component analysis, and the optimal number of clusters is determined by maximizing decision boundary distances via support vector machines. We conclude the analysis by providing guidance on how to use such clusters to select a diverse set of topologies for future studies. Topology Bench, openly available via Dataset 1 (https://zenodo.org/records/13921775) and Code 1 (https://github.com/TopologyBench), promotes accessibility, consistency, and reproducibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
16.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The scope of the Journal includes advances in the state-of-the-art of optical networking science, technology, and engineering. Both theoretical contributions (including new techniques, concepts, analyses, and economic studies) and practical contributions (including optical networking experiments, prototypes, and new applications) are encouraged. Subareas of interest include the architecture and design of optical networks, optical network survivability and security, software-defined optical networking, elastic optical networks, data and control plane advances, network management related innovation, and optical access networks. Enabling technologies and their applications are suitable topics only if the results are shown to directly impact optical networking beyond simple point-to-point networks.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic-threshold-based pre-relaying for enhanced key allocation in quantum-secured networks Optical-access networks for smart sustainable cities: from network architecture to fiber deployment Near-real-time 6G service operation enabled by distributed intelligence and in-band telemetry A new control and management architecture for SDN-enabled quantum key distribution networks Design with low cost of equipment for metro filterless optical networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1