Maílis Carrilho, Sophie von Merten, Maria da Luz Mathias, Joaquim T Tapisso
{"title":"指令2010/63/EU对野生源动物研究的影响:圈养野生小鼠(Apodemus sp.)研究的发表趋势综述","authors":"Maílis Carrilho, Sophie von Merten, Maria da Luz Mathias, Joaquim T Tapisso","doi":"10.1177/00236772241290404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most animals used in experimentation are small mammals. In the EU, Directive 2010/63/EU regulates the use of laboratory animals for experimental purposes. However, there are few guidelines for the use of wild-sourced animals, which cover permits, experimentation, transport, maintenance, and setting free after experiments. To evaluate the effect of the Directive on the study of wild-sourced animals, we conducted a systematised literature review focusing on three widespread rodents of the genus <i>Apodemus</i>: <i>Apodemus agrarius</i>, <i>A. flavicollis</i> and <i>A. sylvaticus</i>. We selected studies performed across the EU, published before (2000-August 2010), during (September 2010-2012) and after implementation of the Directive (2013-2022). From those, we collected data on three main topics: i) authorisation; ii) care and accommodation and iii) methods of killing. We found that after implementation of the Directive a higher proportion of published studies provided information about authorisation. In contrast, there was no significant difference over time in the information given about the care and accommodation of animals or methods of killing. As such, our analysis suggests that there is still room for improvement to achieve consistency across journals publishing research involving wild-sourced small mammals. Specifically, editors should require the provision of detailed information by authors regarding proper animal care (e.g. more detailed care and accommodation protocols). To harmonise the information requested by different editorial boards, we recommend the addition of specific guidelines in the Directive regarding wild animals, particularly on their proper accommodation, manipulation, enrichment and veterinary control.</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"236772241290404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Directive 2010/63/EU on research on wild-sourced animals: a review of publication trends in studies on captive wild mice (<i>Apodemus</i> sp.).\",\"authors\":\"Maílis Carrilho, Sophie von Merten, Maria da Luz Mathias, Joaquim T Tapisso\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00236772241290404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most animals used in experimentation are small mammals. In the EU, Directive 2010/63/EU regulates the use of laboratory animals for experimental purposes. However, there are few guidelines for the use of wild-sourced animals, which cover permits, experimentation, transport, maintenance, and setting free after experiments. To evaluate the effect of the Directive on the study of wild-sourced animals, we conducted a systematised literature review focusing on three widespread rodents of the genus <i>Apodemus</i>: <i>Apodemus agrarius</i>, <i>A. flavicollis</i> and <i>A. sylvaticus</i>. We selected studies performed across the EU, published before (2000-August 2010), during (September 2010-2012) and after implementation of the Directive (2013-2022). From those, we collected data on three main topics: i) authorisation; ii) care and accommodation and iii) methods of killing. We found that after implementation of the Directive a higher proportion of published studies provided information about authorisation. In contrast, there was no significant difference over time in the information given about the care and accommodation of animals or methods of killing. As such, our analysis suggests that there is still room for improvement to achieve consistency across journals publishing research involving wild-sourced small mammals. Specifically, editors should require the provision of detailed information by authors regarding proper animal care (e.g. more detailed care and accommodation protocols). To harmonise the information requested by different editorial boards, we recommend the addition of specific guidelines in the Directive regarding wild animals, particularly on their proper accommodation, manipulation, enrichment and veterinary control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory Animals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"236772241290404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory Animals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772241290404\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772241290404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Directive 2010/63/EU on research on wild-sourced animals: a review of publication trends in studies on captive wild mice (Apodemus sp.).
Most animals used in experimentation are small mammals. In the EU, Directive 2010/63/EU regulates the use of laboratory animals for experimental purposes. However, there are few guidelines for the use of wild-sourced animals, which cover permits, experimentation, transport, maintenance, and setting free after experiments. To evaluate the effect of the Directive on the study of wild-sourced animals, we conducted a systematised literature review focusing on three widespread rodents of the genus Apodemus: Apodemus agrarius, A. flavicollis and A. sylvaticus. We selected studies performed across the EU, published before (2000-August 2010), during (September 2010-2012) and after implementation of the Directive (2013-2022). From those, we collected data on three main topics: i) authorisation; ii) care and accommodation and iii) methods of killing. We found that after implementation of the Directive a higher proportion of published studies provided information about authorisation. In contrast, there was no significant difference over time in the information given about the care and accommodation of animals or methods of killing. As such, our analysis suggests that there is still room for improvement to achieve consistency across journals publishing research involving wild-sourced small mammals. Specifically, editors should require the provision of detailed information by authors regarding proper animal care (e.g. more detailed care and accommodation protocols). To harmonise the information requested by different editorial boards, we recommend the addition of specific guidelines in the Directive regarding wild animals, particularly on their proper accommodation, manipulation, enrichment and veterinary control.
期刊介绍:
The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.