指令2010/63/EU对野生源动物研究的影响:圈养野生小鼠(Apodemus sp.)研究的发表趋势综述

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Laboratory Animals Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1177/00236772241290404
Maílis Carrilho, Sophie von Merten, Maria da Luz Mathias, Joaquim T Tapisso
{"title":"指令2010/63/EU对野生源动物研究的影响:圈养野生小鼠(Apodemus sp.)研究的发表趋势综述","authors":"Maílis Carrilho, Sophie von Merten, Maria da Luz Mathias, Joaquim T Tapisso","doi":"10.1177/00236772241290404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most animals used in experimentation are small mammals. In the EU, Directive 2010/63/EU regulates the use of laboratory animals for experimental purposes. However, there are few guidelines for the use of wild-sourced animals, which cover permits, experimentation, transport, maintenance, and setting free after experiments. To evaluate the effect of the Directive on the study of wild-sourced animals, we conducted a systematised literature review focusing on three widespread rodents of the genus <i>Apodemus</i>: <i>Apodemus agrarius</i>, <i>A. flavicollis</i> and <i>A. sylvaticus</i>. We selected studies performed across the EU, published before (2000-August 2010), during (September 2010-2012) and after implementation of the Directive (2013-2022). From those, we collected data on three main topics: i) authorisation; ii) care and accommodation and iii) methods of killing. We found that after implementation of the Directive a higher proportion of published studies provided information about authorisation. In contrast, there was no significant difference over time in the information given about the care and accommodation of animals or methods of killing. As such, our analysis suggests that there is still room for improvement to achieve consistency across journals publishing research involving wild-sourced small mammals. Specifically, editors should require the provision of detailed information by authors regarding proper animal care (e.g. more detailed care and accommodation protocols). To harmonise the information requested by different editorial boards, we recommend the addition of specific guidelines in the Directive regarding wild animals, particularly on their proper accommodation, manipulation, enrichment and veterinary control.</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"236772241290404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Directive 2010/63/EU on research on wild-sourced animals: a review of publication trends in studies on captive wild mice (<i>Apodemus</i> sp.).\",\"authors\":\"Maílis Carrilho, Sophie von Merten, Maria da Luz Mathias, Joaquim T Tapisso\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00236772241290404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most animals used in experimentation are small mammals. In the EU, Directive 2010/63/EU regulates the use of laboratory animals for experimental purposes. However, there are few guidelines for the use of wild-sourced animals, which cover permits, experimentation, transport, maintenance, and setting free after experiments. To evaluate the effect of the Directive on the study of wild-sourced animals, we conducted a systematised literature review focusing on three widespread rodents of the genus <i>Apodemus</i>: <i>Apodemus agrarius</i>, <i>A. flavicollis</i> and <i>A. sylvaticus</i>. We selected studies performed across the EU, published before (2000-August 2010), during (September 2010-2012) and after implementation of the Directive (2013-2022). From those, we collected data on three main topics: i) authorisation; ii) care and accommodation and iii) methods of killing. We found that after implementation of the Directive a higher proportion of published studies provided information about authorisation. In contrast, there was no significant difference over time in the information given about the care and accommodation of animals or methods of killing. As such, our analysis suggests that there is still room for improvement to achieve consistency across journals publishing research involving wild-sourced small mammals. Specifically, editors should require the provision of detailed information by authors regarding proper animal care (e.g. more detailed care and accommodation protocols). To harmonise the information requested by different editorial boards, we recommend the addition of specific guidelines in the Directive regarding wild animals, particularly on their proper accommodation, manipulation, enrichment and veterinary control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory Animals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"236772241290404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory Animals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772241290404\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772241290404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数用于实验的动物都是小型哺乳动物。在欧盟,指令2010/63/EU规范了实验动物的使用。然而,很少有关于使用野生动物的指导方针,包括许可、实验、运输、维护和实验后的放生。为了评估该指令对野生动物研究的影响,我们对三种分布广泛的黑线姬鼠(Apodemus agrarius)、黄尾姬鼠(a . flavicollis)和西林姬鼠(a . sylvaticus)进行了系统的文献综述。我们选择了在欧盟范围内进行的研究,发表于指令实施之前(2000- 2010年8月)、期间(2010-2012年9月)和之后(2013-2022年)。从中,我们收集了三个主要主题的数据:i)授权;Ii)照料和住宿;iii)杀戮方法。我们发现,在指令实施后,更高比例的已发表研究提供了有关授权的信息。相比之下,随着时间的推移,关于动物的照顾和住宿或杀戮方法的信息没有显着差异。因此,我们的分析表明,在发表涉及野生小型哺乳动物的研究的期刊之间实现一致性仍有改进的空间。具体而言,编辑应要求作者提供有关适当动物护理的详细信息(例如,更详细的护理和住宿协议)。为了协调不同编辑委员会所要求的信息,我们建议在指令中增加关于野生动物的具体指导方针,特别是关于它们的适当住宿、操作、富集和兽医控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Directive 2010/63/EU on research on wild-sourced animals: a review of publication trends in studies on captive wild mice (Apodemus sp.).

Most animals used in experimentation are small mammals. In the EU, Directive 2010/63/EU regulates the use of laboratory animals for experimental purposes. However, there are few guidelines for the use of wild-sourced animals, which cover permits, experimentation, transport, maintenance, and setting free after experiments. To evaluate the effect of the Directive on the study of wild-sourced animals, we conducted a systematised literature review focusing on three widespread rodents of the genus Apodemus: Apodemus agrarius, A. flavicollis and A. sylvaticus. We selected studies performed across the EU, published before (2000-August 2010), during (September 2010-2012) and after implementation of the Directive (2013-2022). From those, we collected data on three main topics: i) authorisation; ii) care and accommodation and iii) methods of killing. We found that after implementation of the Directive a higher proportion of published studies provided information about authorisation. In contrast, there was no significant difference over time in the information given about the care and accommodation of animals or methods of killing. As such, our analysis suggests that there is still room for improvement to achieve consistency across journals publishing research involving wild-sourced small mammals. Specifically, editors should require the provision of detailed information by authors regarding proper animal care (e.g. more detailed care and accommodation protocols). To harmonise the information requested by different editorial boards, we recommend the addition of specific guidelines in the Directive regarding wild animals, particularly on their proper accommodation, manipulation, enrichment and veterinary control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laboratory Animals
Laboratory Animals 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.
期刊最新文献
Current practices of pain assessment and analgesic use in laboratory mice: A 2022 FELASA Working Group survey. Cellular immune response against rabies vaccination in laboratory-bred dogs: A systematised review. Current research and guidelines for euthanasia in laboratory fish with a focus on fathead minnows. Inconsistent terminology in rodent anatomy hinders appropriate blood sampling in laboratory animal science: A review of blood sampling techniques on the head of mice. Moving from guideline recommendations to practical, reasonable proposals: Biosafety considerations, breeding performance and challenges during specific pathogen-free animal facility enlargement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1